The university of california processing tomato workgroup: An example of ongoing effective collaborations

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 542, Issue , 2001, Pages 253-259

  Murray, M ^a   Cahn, M D ^a   Miyao, G ^a   Brittan, K ^a   Mullen, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative extension; Land grant colleges; Lycopersicon esculentum; University of California; Workgroup

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879588211     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.542.33     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barrett, D.M. 1997. Determination of the effects of maturity, peeling and cooking conditions on the peelability and dice-yield of selected varieties. Report to the California League of Food Processors.
2. Boese, J. 2000. California League of Food Processors. Personal communication.
3. California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS). 1999. County Agricultural Commissioners Report, 1998. Web site.
4. California Agricultural Statistics Service. 2000. California Processing Tomato Report (1999 production year). January 31.
5. California Tomato Growers Association. 2000. Yearly Yields and Crop Value. Web site.
6. Hartz, T.K., G. Miyao, R.J. Mullen, M.D. Cahn, J. Valencia, and K.L. Brittan. 1999. Potassium Requirements for Maximum Yield and Fruit Quality of Processing Tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124(2):199-204.
7. Miyao, G., B. Mullen, D. May, M. Murray, J. Valencia, J. Caprile, M. Cahn, B. Weir, T. Hartz, and D. Barrett. 1998. UC Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials. Pp. 85-93 in 1998 Annual Research Report. California Tomato Research Institute.
8. Murray, M. 1997. The Integration of County Based Extension and Applied Research Functions: the California Experience Pp. 65-71 in Proceedings: Second Australasia Pacific Extension Conference: Managing Change and Building Knowledge and Skills.
9. Murray, M. 1999. A Contrast of the Australian and California extension and technology transfer processes. J. Extension 37(2).
10. Murray, M., M. Cahn, J. Caprile, D. May, G. Miyao, B. Mullen, J. Valencia, and B. Weir. 1999. University of California Cooperative Extension Processing Tomato Cultivar Evaluation Program. HortTechnology, 9(1):36-39.
11. Processing Tomato Advisory Board. 1999. 1999 Tomato Processors. Web site.
12. Scheuring, A.F. 1995. Science and Service: a History of the Land-Grant University and Agriculture in California. ANR Publications, Oakland, Calif.
13. World Processing Tomato Council. 1999. Worldwide Production of Tomatoes for Processing. October 1999. Web site.