Assessment of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis with multidetector computed tomography: In vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 659-668

  De Heer, Linda M ^a   Habets, Jesse ^a   Kluin, Jolanda ^a   Stella, Pieter R ^a   Mali, Willem P Th M ^a   Van Herwerden, Lex A ^a   Budde, Ricardo P J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b GELRE HOSPITALS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artefacts; Computed tomography; In vitro; Morphology; Prosthetic heart valves

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE;

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CARDIAC IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING PHANTOM; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCESS MODEL; RADIOPAQUE STAINLESS STEEL STENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTOLE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; VASCULAR STENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; ARTIFACTS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84879555536     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0111-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humprhies K et al (2007) Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116:755-763
2. Walther T, Falk V, Kempfert J et al (2008) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:983-988
3. Walther T, Simon P, Dewey T et al (2007) Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116:1240-1245
4. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector row computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:1106-1113
5. Kurra V, Schoenhagen P, Roselli EE et al (2009) Prevalence of significant peripheral artery disease in patients evaluated for percutaneous aortic valve insertion: preprocedural assessment with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(5):1258-1264
6. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V et al (2008) Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multi-slice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 1:321-330
7. Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 31:1114-1123
8. Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH et al (2012) Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 158:353-358
9. Wood DA, Tops LF, Mayo JR et al (2009) Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 103(9):1295-1301
10. Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N et al (2009) Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:911-918
11. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G et al (2011) Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 150:142-145
12. Caudron J, Fares J, Hauville C et al (2011) Evaluation of multislice computed tomography early after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 108:873-881
13. Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21:1390-1396
14. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, Prokop M, De Mol BAJM (2011) Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 20:216-222
15. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnul JG et al (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975-1014
16. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ ASNC NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525-e555
17. Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P et al (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:466-478
18. Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS et al (2008) The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 191:26-31
19. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128-1134
20. Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multidetector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative finding as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19:857-867
21. Symersky P, Budde RPJ, De Mol BA, Prokop M (2009) Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 104:1128-1134
22. Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C et al (2010) Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology 255:377-385
23. Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Beurich HW et al (2011) Haemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eurointervention 7:57-63
24. Roques F, Nashef SAM, Michel P et al (1999) Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the euroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:816-823