One-year outcome of haemorrhoidectomy: A prospective multicentre French study

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 719-726

  Bouchard, D ^a   Abramowitz, L ^b   Castinel, A ^c   Suduca, J M ^d   Staumont, G ^d   Soudan, D ^e   Devulder, F ^f   Pigot, F ^a   Varastet, M ^g   Ganansia, R ^e  

^a Hopital Bagatelle   (France)

^b BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Clinique Théodore Ducos   (France)

^d Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc   (France)

^e SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (France)

^f Clinique Courlancy   (France)

^g ClinSearch   (France)

Author keywords

Anal incontinence; Faecal incontinence; Haemorrhoidectomy; Haemorrhoids; Leopold bellan procedure; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANOPLASTY; ANUS DISEASE; ANUS FISSURE; ANUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONSTIPATION; FECES IMPACTION; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; INFECTION; LOW ANAL FISTULA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENT DISEASE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE RETENTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FISSURE IN ANO; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL FISTULA; RECURRENCE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879535381     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12090     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abramowitz L, Godeberge P, Soudan D, Staumont G, Société nationale française de colo-proctologie. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique sur le traitement de la maladie hémorroïdaire. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25: 674-702.
2. Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG. Symptomatic haemorrhoids: current incidence and complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 477-81.
3. Madoff RD, Fleshman JW, Clinical Practice Committee, American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and the treatment of hemorrhoids. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1463-73.
4. Acheson AG, Scholefield JH. Management of haemorrhoids. BMJ 2008; 336: 380-3.
5. Denis J, Dubois N, Ganansia R, du Puy-Montbrun T, Lemarchand N. Haemorrhoidectomy: hospital Leopold Bellan procedure. Int Surg 1989; 74: 152-3.
6. Milligan ETC., Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937; 2: 1119-24.
7. Goligher JC (1980, 4th edition). Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, pp. 93-135. Baillière Tindall, London.
8. Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ. Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1419-26.
9. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77-80.
10. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97.
11. Perneger TV, Leplège A, Etter JF, Rougemont A. Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1051-60.
12. Hoff SD, Bailey HR, Butts DR et al. Ambulatory surgical hemorrhoidectomy-a solution to postoperative urinary retention? Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1242-4.
13. Pigot F, Juguet F, Bouchard D, Castinel A. Do we have to stop anticoagulant and platelet-inhibitor treatments during proctological surgery? Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1516-20.
14. Favreau C, Siproudhis L, Eleouet M, Bouguen G, Bretagne JF. Underlying functional bowel disorder may explain patient dissatisfaction after haemorroïdal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 356-61.
15. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan and Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1033-7.
16. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, Bonanno M, Mancini S, THD group of the SICCR (Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery), Yalti T, Giamundo P, Hoch J, El Gaddal A, Pagano C. Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 205-11.
17. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 204-12.
18. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD006761.
19. Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK. Continence disorders after anal surgery - a relevant problem? Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 1023-31.
20. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al., Procedure for Prolapse Hemmorrhoids(PPH) Multicenter Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorroidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1824-36.
21. Seow-Choen F, Ho YH, Ang HG, Goh HS. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1165-9.
22. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Anal dilatation, lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy and haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of second and third degree haemorrhoids A prospective randomized study. Int Surg 1992; 77: 261-3.
23. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Goh HS. Haemorrhoidectomy and disordered rectal and anal physiology in patients with prolapsed haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 596-8.
24. Ho YH, Tan M. Ambulatory anorectal manometric findings in patients before and after haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997; 12: 296-7.
25. Abbasakoor F, Nelson M, Beynon J, Patel B, Carr ND. Anal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1522-4.
26. MacDonald A, Smith A, McNeill AD, Finlay IG. Manual dilatation of the anus. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1381-2.
27. van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K, Mollen R, van Goor H. Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 1042-5.
28. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989; 4: 118-22.
29. Hyman N. Incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy: a prospective study and quality of life assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 35-8.
30. Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R et al. Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after delivery? Results of a prospective study Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 596-8.