Dynamic electricity pricing-Which programs do consumers prefer?

Energy Policy

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 226-234

  Dütschke, Elisabeth ^a   Paetz, Alexandra Gwyn ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumer acceptance; DSM; Smart homes

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENTS; DSM; QUESTIONNAIRE STUDIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; SMART HOME TECHNOLOGY; SMART HOMES;

AUTOMATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS;

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY MARKET; PRICE DYNAMICS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

GERMANY;

EID: 84879501966     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Addelman Sidney Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics 1962, 4(1).
2. Allcott H. Rethinking real-time electricity pricing. Ressource and Energy Economics 2011, 33(2011):820-842.
3. Allerding, F. Schmeck, H. (2011): Organic Smart Home-architecture for energy management in intelligent buildings. In: Workshop Organic Computing as part of ICAC 2011.
4. Backhaus K., Erichson B., Plinke W., Weiber R. Multivariate Analysemethoden-Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
5. Bartusch C., Wallin F., Odlare M., Vassileva I., Westler L. Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: demand response and customer perception. Energy Policy 2011, 39(9):5008-5025.
6. Borenstein S. The trouble with electricity markets: understanding California's restructuring disaster. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2002, 16(1):191-211. (21).
7. Brennan T.J. Consumer preference not to choose: Methodological and policy implications. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1616-1627.
8. Cousins T. Using time of use (TOU) tariffs in industrial, commercial and residential applications effectively. TLC Engineering Solutions 2009.
9. Darby S. Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement?. Building Research and Information 2010, 38:442-457.
10. Energate (2011). Daily News, Energate Messenger No. 119, 22.06.2011.
11. Ericson T. Household's self-selection of dynamic electricity tariffs. Applied Energy, 2011 2011, 88(7):2541-2547.
12. Faruqui A., George S. The value of dynamic pricing in mass markets. The Electricity Journal 2002, 2002:45-55.
13. Faruqui A., George S. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. The Electricity Journal 2005, 18(4):53-63.
14. Faruqui A., Sergici S. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2010, 38(2010):193-225.
15. Fischer, C. (2007). Influencing electricity consumption via consumer feedback. In: Proceedings of the ECEEE 2007 Summer Study. pp. 1873-1884.
16. Gerpott T.J., Mahmudova I. Determinants of price mark-up tolerance for green electricity-lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment 2010, 19:304-318.
17. Gordon K., Olson W.P., Nieto A.D. Responding to EPAct 2005: looking at smart meters for electricity. Time-based rate structures, and net metering 2006, Edison Electric Institute (EEI), Washington, D.C.
18. Green Paul E. On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. The Journal of Customer Research 1974, 1:61-68.
19. Green P.E., Wind Y. New way to measure consumer judgments. Harvard Business Review 1975, 106-117.
20. Hargreaves T., Nye M., Burgess J. Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6111-6119.
21. Hillemacher, L.; Eer-Frey, A.; Fichtner, W. (2011). Preis- und Effizienzsignale im MeRegio Smart Grid Feldtest-Simulationen und erste Ergebnisse. In: Proceedings of the seventh Internationale Energiewirtschaftstagung. Vienna.
22. Klobasa, M. (2007). Dynamische Simulation eines Lastmanagements und Integration von Windenergie in ein Elektrizitätsnetz auf Landesebene unter regelungstechnischen und Kostengesichtspunkten. Dissertation ETH Zürich, Nr. 17324.
23. Lineweber D.C. Understanding residential customer support for - and opposition to - smart grid investments. The Electricity Journal (24) 2011, 8(2011):92-100.
24. Lo K.L., McDonald J.R., Le T.Q. Time-of-day electricity pricing incorporating elasticity for load management purposes. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 1991, 13(4):230-239.
25. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2000, 1(2).
26. Mert, W., Watts, M., Tritthart, W. (2009). Smart domestic appliances in sustainable energy systems-consumer acceptance and restrictions. In: Proceedings of the ECEEE 2009 Summer Study. pp. 1751-1761.
27. Moholkar A., Klinkhachorn P., Feliachi A. Effects of dynamic pricing on residential electricity bill. Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004. IEEE PES 2004, 2:1030-1035.
28. Neenan B., Boisvert R.N., Cappers P.A. What makes a customer price responsive?. The Electricity Journal, April 2002, 2002:52-59.
29. Newsham G.R., Bowker B.G. The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: a review. EnergyPolicy 2010, 38(2010):3289-3296.
30. Nieschlag R., Dichtl E., Hörschgen H. Marketing 1991, 16. Duncker und Humblot, Auflage, Berlin.
31. Orme B. Interpreting the Results of Conjoint Analysis 2010, Research Publishers, Madison.
32. Paetz A.-G., Dütschke E., Fichtner W. Smart homes as a means to sustainable energy consumption: a study of onsumer perceptions. Journal of Consumer Policy 2012, 35(1):23-41.
33. Piette M.A., Watson D., Motegi N., Kiliccote S., Xu P. Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: Program Description and Results 2006, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley.
34. Quaschning V., Hanitsch R. Lastmanagement einer zukünftigen Energieversorgung-Integration regenerativer Energien in die Elektrizitätsversorgung. BWK - Brennstoff Wärme Kraft 1999, 10(1999):64-67.
35. Stadler, M.; Auer, H.; Haas, R. (2004). Die Bedeutung von dynamischen Tarifmodellen und neuer Ansätze des Demand-Side-Managements als Ergänzung zu Hedging-Manahmen in deregulierten Elektrizitätsmärkten. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Nr. 7895.
36. Stromback, J.; Dromacque, C., Yassin, M.H. (2011): The Potential of Smart Meter Enabled Programs to Increase Energy and System Efficiency-A Mass Pilot Vomparison. VaasaETT Global Energy Think Tank.
37. Wolak, F. (2010). Residential Customer Response to Real-Time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak-Pricing Experiment. Department of Economics, Stanford.
38. Wolter, D. Reuter, E. (2005). Preis- und Handelskonzepte in der Stromwirtschaft-Von den Anfängen der Elektrizitätswirtschaft zur Einrichtung einer Strombörse. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden.