Sharing responsibility for carbon dioxide emissions: A perspective on border tax adjustments

Energy Policy

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 850-856

  Chang, Ning ^a  

^a SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS   (China)

Author keywords

Border tax adjustments; Carbon dioxide emissions; Shared responsibility

Indexed keywords

BORDER TAX ADJUSTMENTS; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CARBON TAXATION; CHINESE ECONOMY; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EQUITY AND EFFICIENCIES; SHARED RESPONSIBILITY; TEXTILE SECTOR;

GLOBAL WARMING;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BORDER REGION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLLUTION TAX;

CHINA;

EID: 84879500640     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Atkinson G., Hamilton K., Ruta G., Van Der Mensbrugghe D. Trade in "Virtual Carbon": empirical results and implications for policy. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:563-574.
2. Babiker M.H., Rutherford T.F. The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements. Energy Journal 2005, 26:99-125.
3. Bastianoni S., Pulselli F.M., Tiezzi E. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics 2004, 49:253-257.
4. Brack D., Grubb M., Windram C. International Trade and Climate Change Policies 2000, Earthscan, London.
5. Cadarso M., Lopes L., Gomez N., Tobarra M. International trade and shared responsibility by sector. An application to the Spanish economy. Ecological Economics 2012, 83:221-235.
6. Charnovitz, S., 2003. Trade and Climate: Potential Conflicts and Synergies. Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
7. Clarke H. Carbon leakages, consumption-based carbon taxes and international climate change agreements. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 2010, 29:156-168.
8. Common, M., Salma, U., 1992. An Economic Analysis of Australian Carbon dioxide Emissions. Research Project ERDC-141, Australian National University.
9. Cosbey A. Border Carbon Adjustment 2008, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg.
10. De Cendra, J., 2006. Can Emissions Trading Schemes be Coupled With Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis Vis-à-Vis WTO Law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law15, pp. 131-145.
11. 2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European Cement Industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy 2006, 6:93-113.
12. Dröge, S., 2008. Climate Tariffs and the Credibility of the EU Climate and Energy Package. SWP Comment, 2008/C 26, November.
13. 2 reductions and carbon leakage: the consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1993, 25:162-176.
14. 2 over-emissions from the perspective of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics 2003, 40:121-141.
15. Gallego B., Lenzen M. A consistent formulation of producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research 2005, 17:365-391.
16. Goh G. The world trade organization, Kyoto and energy tax adjustments at the border. Journal of World Trade 2004, 38:395-423.
17. 2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophysical Research Letters 2008, 35. 10.1029/2007GL032887.
18. 2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2001, OECD, Paris.
19. IEA (International Energy Agency) Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Germany, 2007 Review 2007, OECD, Paris.
20. IPCC Climate Change 2001: Mitigation 2001, Cambridge University Press, UK.
21. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
22. 2 emissions in Japan: influences of imports and exports. Applied Energy 1998, 59:163-174.
23. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 1998, 26(6):495-506.
24. Lenzen M., Murray J., Sack F., Wiedmann T. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice. Ecological Economics 2007, 61:27-42.
25. Lin B., Sun C. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy 2010, 8:613-621.
26. Machado G., Schaeffer R., Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics 2001, 39:409-424.
27. 2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility. Energy Policy 2001, 29:327-334.
28. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS), China Statistical Yearbook 2010. China Statistical Press (in Chinese): Beijing.
29. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China, China Statistical Yearbook 2008. China Statistical Press (in Chinese): Beijing.
30. OECD, 2003. Environmental Policy in the Steel Industry: Using Economic Instruments. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/20/33709359.pdf.
31. Paltsev S.V. The Kyoto protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage. The Energy Journal 2001, 22:53-79.
32. Pan J., Phillips J., Chen Y. China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2008, 24:354-376.
33. Peters G.P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:13-23.
34. Peters G.P., Hertwich E.G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16:379-389.
35. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42:1401-1407.
36. Peters G.P., Hertwich E.G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Climatic Change 2008, 86:51-66.
37. 2 emissions: a comparative input-output study for Germany and the UK 1993, Springer, Berlin.
38. Reinaud, J., 2008. Climate Policy and Carbon Leakage. Impacts of the European Emissions Trading Scheme on Aluminium, IEA Information Paper.
39. Rodrigues J., Domingos T., Giljum S., Schneider F. Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility. Ecological Economics 2006, 59:256-266.
40. 2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy 2004, 32:199-205.
41. Shin S. Developing country's perspective on COP3 development (Kyoto Protocol). Energy Policy 1998, 26:519-526.
42. Taniotti, L., Olhoff, A., Teh, R., Simmons, B., Kulacoglu, V., Abaza, H., 2009. Trade and Climate Change: A Report by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization. UN and WTO, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/trade_climate_change_e.pdf.
43. Vojnovic I. Intergenerational and intragenerational requirements for sustainability. Environmental Conversation 1995, 22:223-228.
44. Wang T., Watson J. Who Owns China's Carbon Emissions? 2007, Tyndal Centre for Climate Change Research, Brighton, UK.
45. Weber C.L., Matthews H.S. Embodied emissions in US International Trade: 1997-2004. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41:4875-4881.
46. Weber C.L., Peters G.P., Guan D., Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3572-3577.
47. Whalley, J., 2009. On the Effectiveness of Carbon-Motivated Border Tax Adjustments. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series no. 63.
48. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 2010, 38:350-356.