Discourses on the implementation of wind power: Stakeholder views on public engagement

Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 75-88

  Wolsink, Maarten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879498886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849776707     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Aitken, M., McDonald, S. and Strachan, P. (2008) ‘Locating “power” in wind power planning processes:The (not so) influential role of local objectors’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 51, no 6 pp777-799
2. Breukers, S. (2007) ‘Changing institutional landscapes for implementing wind power: A geographical comparison of institutional capacity building:The Netherlands, England and North Rhine-Westphalia’, PhD Thesis, Amsterdam University Press, http://dare.uva.nl/record/209600
3. Breukers, S. and Wolsink, M. (2007) ‘Wind power in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison’, Energy Policy35, no 5, 2737-2750
4. Doody, D. G., Kearney, P., Barry, J., Moles, R. and O’Regan, B. (2009) ‘Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators’, Ecological Indicators, vol 9, no 6, pp1129-1137
5. Dryzek, J. (2005) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Eden, S., Donaldson, A. and Walker, G. (2005) ‘Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography’, Areavol 37, pp413-422
7. Ellis, G., Barry, J. and Robinson, C. (2007) ‘Many ways to say “no”, different ways to say “yes”: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 50, no 4, pp517-551
8. Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., Strachan, P. and Szarka, J. (2009) ‘Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception?’, Planning Theory and Practice, vol 10, no 4, pp521-547
9. Haggett, C. (2009) ‘Public engagement in planning for renewable energy’, in S. Davoudi, J. Crawford and A. Mehmood (eds) Planning for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners, Earthscan, London, pp297-307
10. Johansson, M. and Laike, T. (2007) ‘Intention to respond to local wind turbines:The role of attitudes and visual perception’, Wind Energy, vol 10, no 5, pp435-451
11. Jones, C. R. and Eiser, J. R. (2009) ‘Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study’, Energy Policy, vol 37, no 11, pp4604-4614
12. Lothian, A. (1999). ‘Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol 44, no 4, pp177-198
13. McKeown, B. and Thomas, D. (1988) Q Methodology, Sage,Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Robbins, P. and Krueger, R. (2000) ‘Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography’, Professional Geographer, vol 52, no 4, pp636-648
15. Stenner, P., Watts, S. and Morell, M. (2008) ‘Q methodology’, in C. Willig and W. Stainton-Rogers (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Sage, Los Angeles, pp215-235
16. Stenzel, T. and Frenzel, A. (2008) ‘Regulating technological change:The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets’, Energy Policy, vol 36, no 5, pp2645-2657
17. Verbruggen, A. and Lauber, V. (2009) ‘Basic concepts for designing renewable electricity support aiming at a full-scale transition by 2050’, Energy Policy, vol 37, no 12, pp5732-5743
18. Walker, G. and Devine-Wright, P. (2008) ‘Community renewable energy:What should it mean?’ Energy Policy, vol 36, no 2, pp497-500
19. Warren, C. R. and McFadyen, M. (2010) ‘Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland’, Land Use Policy, vol 27, no.2, pp204-213
20. Webler, T., Tuler, S. and Krueger, R. (2001) ‘What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public’, Environmental Management, vol 27, no 3, pp435-450
21. Wolsink, M. (2007) ‘Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decisionmaking on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation’, Energy Policy, vol 35, no 5, pp2692-2704
22. Wolsink, M. (2009) ‘Wind power: Is there a planning problem?’ and ‘Planning: problem “carrier” or problem “source”?’, Planning Theory and Practice, vol 10, no 4, pp521-547
23. Wolsink, M. (2010) ‘Near-shore wind power: Protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes and the technocratic planning perspective’, Land Use Policy, vol 27, no 2, pp195-203
24. Wolsink, M. and Breukers, S. (2010) ‘Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power: An international study of stakeholder perspectives’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 53, no 4, DOI: 10.1080/09640561003633581
25. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Bürer, M. J. (2007) ‘Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept’, Energy Policy, vol 35, no 5, pp2683-2691