Dynamic and reversible surface topography influences cell morphology

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101 A, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2313-2321

  Kiang, Jennifer D ^a   Wen, Jessica H ^a   Del Álamo, Juan C ^b   Engler, Adam J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SANFORD CONSORTIUM FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cell area; magnetic field; microwire; polyacrylamide; roughness

Indexed keywords

CELL MORPHOLOGY; DYNAMIC TOPOGRAPHY; HYDROGEL SURFACES; MICROSCALE AND NANOSCALE; MICROWIRE; POLYACRYLAMIDE HYDROGELS; TOPOGRAPHICAL CHANGES; VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS;

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; HYDROGELS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; POLYACRYLATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

TOPOGRAPHY;

POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; HYDROGEL; MAGNETIC FIELD; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; RAT; RIGIDITY; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; HYDROGEL; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; RATS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84879498744     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34543     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Reilly GC, Engler AJ,. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J Biomech 2010; 43: 55-62.
2. Hay ED,. Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix. Plenum Press, New York; 1991.
3. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D,. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004; 86: 617-628.
4. Isenberg BC, Dimilla PA, Walker M, Kim S, Wong JY,. Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. Biophys J 2009; 97: 1313-1322.
5. Curtis AS, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Aitchison G,. Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2004; 3: 61-65.
6. Martinez E, Engel E, Planell JA, Samitier J,. Effects of artificial micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Ann Anat 2009; 191: 126-135.
7. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, Teng D, Engler AJ, Chien S, Jin S,. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 2130-2135.
8. McNamara LE, McMurray RJ, Biggs MJ, Kantawong F, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ,. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J Tissue Eng 2010; 2010: 120623.
9. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO,. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007; 6: 997-1003.
10. Lam MT, Clem WC, Takayama S,. Reversible on-demand cell alignment using reconfigurable microtopography. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1705-1712.
11. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL,. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005; 310: 1139-1143.
12. Engler AJ, Richert L, Wong JY, Picart C, Discher DE,. Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films: Correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion. Surf Sci 2004; 570: 142-154.
13. Nivison-Smith L, Weiss AS,. Alignment of human vascular smooth muscle cells on parallel electrospun synthetic elastin fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012; 100: 155-161.
14. Wang LF, Pai CL, Boyce MC, Rutledge GC,. Wrinkled surface topographies of electrospun polymer fibers. Appl Phys Lett 2009; 94: 151916.
15. Davis KA, Burke KA, Mather PT, Henderson JH,. Dynamic cell behavior on shape memory polymer substrates. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 2285-2293.
16. Le DM, Kulangara K, Adler AF, Leong KW, Ashby VS,. Dynamic topographical control of mesenchymal stem cells by culture on responsive poly(epsilon- caprolactone) surfaces. Adv Mater 2011; 23: 3278-3283.
17. Rao RN, Falls DG, Gerrity RG, Sethuraman SN, Thiruvaiyaru DS,. Intimal thickness and layering, and smooth muscle cell phenotypes in aorta of youth. Pathobiology 2000; 68: 18-28.
18. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE,. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006; 126: 677-689.
19. Rowlands AS, George PA, Cooper JJ-White,. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: Interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008; 295: C1037-C1044.
20. Tse JR, Engler AJ,. Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PLoS One 2011; 6: e15978.
21. Tse JR, Engler AJ,. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr Prot Cell Biol 2010; 10: 1-16.
22. Rajagopalan P, Marganski WA, Brown XQ, Wong JY,. Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata. Biophys J 2004; 87: 2818-2827.
23. Aguirre KM, McCormick RJ, Schwarzbauer JE,. Fibronectin self-association is mediated by complementary sites within the amino-terminal one-third of the molecule. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 27863-27868.
24. Sniadecki NJ, Anguelouch A, Yang MT, Lamb CM, Liu Z, Kirschner SB, Liu Y, Reich DH, Chen CS,. Magnetic microposts as an approach to apply forces to living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 14553-14558.
25. Del Alamo JC, Meili R, B., Alonso-Latorre, J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Aliseda A, Firtel RA, Lasheras JC,. Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 13343-13348.
26. McMurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri PM, Burgess KV, McNamara LE, Tare R, Murawski K, Kingham E, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ,. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011; 10: 637-644.
27. Thomas TT,. Recent advances in the measurement and analysis of surface microgeometry. Wear 1975; 33: 205-233.
28. Chirasatitsin S, Engler AJ,. Detecting cell-adhesive sites in extracellular matrix using force spectroscopy mapping. J Phys Condens Matter 2010; 22: 194102.
29. Flores-Merino, MV, Chirasatitsin S, Lopresti C, Reilly GC, Battaglia G, Engler AJ,. Nanoscopic mechanical anisotropy in hydrogel surfaces. Soft Matter 2010; 6: 4466-4470.
30. Engler AJ, Rehfeldt F, Sen S, Discher DE,. Microtissue elasticity: Measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. Methods Cell Biol 2007; 83: 521-545.
31. Radmacher M, Tillamnn RW, Fritz M, Gaub HE,. From molecules to cells: Imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope. Science 1992; 257: 1900-1905.
32. Kaushik G, Fuhrmann A, Cammarato A, Engler AJ,. In situ mechanical analysis of myofibrillar perturbation and aging on soft, bilayered Drosophila myocardium. Biophys J 2011; 101: 2629-2637.
33. Boudou T, Ohayon J, Picart C, Tracqui P,. An extended relationship for the characterization of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of tunable polyacrylamide gels. Biorheology 2006; 43: 721-728.
34. Mao Y, Schwarzbauer JE,. Stimulatory effects of a three-dimensional microenvironment on cell-mediated fibronectin fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 4427-4436.
35. Iwasaka M, Ueno S,. Polarized light transmission of smooth muscle cells during magnetic field exposures. J Appl Phys 2003; 93: 6701-6703.
36. Giannone G, Dubin BJ-Thaler, Dobereiner HG, Kieffer N, Bresnick AR, Sheetz MP,. Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves. Cell 2004; 116: 431-443.
37. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, Zahir N, Ming W, Weaver V, Janmey PA,. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2005; 60: 24-34.
38. Calvet D, Wong JY, Giasson S,. Rheological monitoring of polyacrylamide gelation: Importance of cross-link density and temperature. Macromolecules 2004; 37: 7762-7771.
39. Cameron AR, Frith JE, Cooper JJ-White,. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 5979-5993.
40. Wong JY, Velasco A, Rajagopalan P, Pham Q,. Directed movement of vascular smooth muscle cells on gradient-compliant hydrogels. Langmuir 2003; 19: 1908-1913.
41. Choi YS, Vincent LG, Lee AR, Kretchmer KC, Chirasatitsin S, Dobke MK, Engler AJ,. The alignment and fusion assembly of adipose-derived stem cells on mechanically patterned matrices. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 6943-6951.
42. Huang J, Grater SV, Corbellini F, Rinck S, Bock E, Kemkemer R, Kessler H, Ding J, Spatz JP,. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009; 9: 1111-1116.
43. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, Kam Z, Geiger B, Bershadsky AD,. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: Externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2001; 153: 1175-1186.
44. Kumar S, Maxwell IZ, Heisterkamp A, Polte TR, Lele TP, Salanga M, Mazur E, Ingber DE,. Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys J 2006; 90: 3762-3773.
45. Ponti A, Matov A, Adams M, Gupton S, Waterman CM-Storer, Danuser G,. Periodic patterns of actin turnover in lamellipodia and lamellae of migrating epithelial cells analyzed by quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy. Biophys J 2005; 89: 3456-3469.