Corrigendum to tactile-sight: A sensory substitution device based on distance-related vibrotactile flow (International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems (2013) 10 (272) DOI: 10.5772/56235);Tactile-Sight: A sensory substitution device based on distance-related vibrotactile flow regular paper

International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems

Volumn 10, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Cancar, Leandro ^a   Diaz, Alex ^b   Barrientos, Antonio ^a   Travieso, David ^b   Jacobs, David M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Sensory substitution; Time to contact; Vibrotactile flow

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROPERTY; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; SENSORY SUBSTITUTION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TEMPORAL INTERVALS; TIME TO CONTACT; VIBROTACTILE FLOWS;

ACTUATORS;

EID: 84879480665     PISSN: 17298806     EISSN: 17298814     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5772/60075     Document Type: Erratum

References (31)

1. Gibson J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
2. Michaels C. F. and Carello C. (1981) Direct Perception. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
3. Turvey M. T., Shaw R. E., Reed E. S., Mace W. M. (1981) Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Acting: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition 9: 237-304.
4. O'Regan J. K. and Noë A. (2001) A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24: 939-1031.
5. Chemero A. (2009) Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Negahdaripour S. (1998) Revised Definition of Optical Flow: Integration of Radiometric and Geometric Cues for Dynamic Scene Analysis. IEEE T. Pattern Anal. 20(9): 961-979.
7. Koenderink J. J. (1986) Optic Flow. Vision Res. 26(1): 161-179.
8. Hancock P. A. and Manster M. P. (1997) Time-to-Contact: More Than Tau Alone. Ecol. Psychol. 9(4): 265-297.
9. Lee D. N. (1998) Guiding Movement by Coupling Taus. Ecol. Psychol. 10(3-4): 221-250.
10. Lee D. N. and Reddish, P. E. (1981) Plummeting Gannets: A Paradigm of Ecological Optics. Nature 293: 293-294.
11. Kondoh T., Yamamura T., Kitazaki S., Kuge N., Boer E. R. (2008) Identification of Visual Cues and Quantification of Drivers' Perception of Proximity Risk to the Lead Vehicle in Car-Following Situations. J. Mech. Sys. Transport. Log. 1: 170-180.
12. Michaels C. F. and de Vries M. M. (1998) Higher Order and Lower Order Variables in the Visual Perception of Relative Pulling Force. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 24: 526-546.
13. Bach-y-Rita P. (2004) Tactile Sensory Substitution Studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013: 83-91.
14. Bach-y-Rita P. (1996) Sensory Substitution and Qualia. In: J. Proust, Editor. Perception et Intermodalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France: 81-100.
15. Bach-y-Rita P., Collins C. C., Saunders F. A., White B., Scadden L. (1969) Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection. Nature. 221: 963-964.
16. Bach-y-Rita P. and Kercel S. W. (2003) Sensory Substitution and the Human-Machine Interface. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7(12): 541-546.
17. Kaczmarek K. A., Bach-y-Rita P., Tompkins W. J. (1991) Electrotactile and Vibrotactile Displays for Sensory Substitution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38: 1-16.
18. Dakopoulos D. and Bourbakis N. G. (2010) Wearable Obstacle Avoidance Electronic Travel Aids for Blind: A Survey. IEEE T. Syst. Man. Cy. C. 40(1): 25-35.
19. Visell Y. (2009) Tactile Sensory Substitution: Models for Enaction in HCI. Interact. Comput. 21(1-2): 38-53.
20. Capelle C., Trullemans C., Arno P., Veraart C. (1998) A Real-Time Experimental Prototype for Enhancement of Vision Rehabilitation Using Auditory Substitution. IEEE T. Bio-Med. Eng. 45(10): 1279-1293.
21. Gonzalez J. C., Bach-y-Rita P., Haase S. J. (2005) Perceptual Recalibration in Sensory Substitution and Perceptual Modification. Pragmatics and Cognition, 13(3): 481-500.
22. Zöllner M., Huber S., Jetter H. C., Reiterer H. (2011) NAVI -A Proof-of-Concept of a Mobile Navigational Aid for Visually Impaired Based on the Microsoft Kinect. In: Campos P., Graham N., Jorge J., Nunes N., Palanque P., Winckler M., editors. Human-Computer Interaction -INTERACT 2011, 6949. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 584-587.
23. Díaz A., Barrientos A., Jacobs D. M., Travieso D. (2011) Vibrotactile Flow and the Detection of Stepon-Places with a Sensory Substitution Device. In: Charles E. and Smart L., editors. Studies in Perception and Action, 11: 8-12.
24. Díaz A., Barrientos A., Jacobs D. M., Travieso D. (2012) Action-Contingent Vibrotactile Flow Facilitates the Detection of Ground Level Obstacles with a Partly Virtual Sensory Substitution Device. Hum. Movement Sci., 31(6): 1571-1584.
25. Jansson G. (1983) Tactile Guidance of Movement. International Journal of Neuroscience, 19(1-4): 37-46.
26. Jansson G. and Brabyn L. (1981) Tactually guided batting. Uppsala Psychological Reports N. 304. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
27. Brooks R. A. (1989) A Robot that Walks: Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network. Neural Comput. 1: 253-262.
28. Brooks, R. A. (1990) Elephants Don't Play Chess. Robot. Auton. Syst. 6(1-2): 3-15.
29. Franceschini N., Ruffier F., Serres J. (2007) A Bio-Inspired Flying Robot Sheds Light on Insect Piloting Abilities. Curr. Biol. 17: 329-335.
30. Jacobs D. M. and Díaz A. (2010) Judgments of Time to Contact are Affected by Rate of Appearance of Visible Texture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63: 1041-1048.
31. Huet M., Jacobs D. M., Camachon C., Missenard O., Gray R., Montagne G. (2011) The Education of Attention as Explanation of Variability of Practice Effects: Learning the Final Approach Phase in a Flight Simulator. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 37: 1841-1854.