The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 4, Issue , 2013, Pages 15-24

  Bastian, Olaf ^a   Syrbe, Ralf Uwe ^a   Rosenberg, Matthias ^a   Rahe, Doreen ^a   Grunewald, Karsten ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGICAL URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem properties, potentials, services, benefits; Land use change modelling tool; Monetary values; Saxony; Soil erosion; Yield losses

Indexed keywords

SECALE CEREALE;

EID: 84879462171     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bastian O., Haase D., Grunewald K. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services-the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:7-16.
2. Bastian O., Grunewald K., Syrbe R.-U. Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 2012, 10.1080/21513732.2011.631941.
3. Bork, H.R., Müller, K., 2002. Landschaftswandel von 500 bis 2500 n. Chr.- In: Böcker, R. (Ed.). Offenhaltung der Landschaft. 33. Hohenheimer Umwelttagung 26.1.2001, pp. 11-26.
4. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:17-29.
5. Costanza R., d'Arge R., deGroot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R., Paruelo J., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
6. de Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75:175-186.
7. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 6:453-462.
8. Fisher B., Turner R.K. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:1167-1169.
9. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:643-653.
10. Grünwald, A., 2011. Zukunft Landschaftsplan. Perspektiven einer methodischen Weiterentwicklung unter Anwendung des Konzepts der Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Master thesis, Technical University Dresden, 128 pp.
11. Grunewald K., Bastian O. Ökosystemdienstleistungen analysieren - begrifflicher und konzeptioneller Rahmen aus landschaftsökologischer Sicht. GEOÖKO 2010, 31:50-82.
12. Haines-Young R., Watkins C., Wale C., Murdock A. Modelling natural capital: the case of landscape restoration on the South Downs, England. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 75:244-264.
13. Haines-Young R., Potschin M.B. England's terrestrial ecosystem services and the rationale for an ecosystem approach. Overview Report, DEFRA 2008, 33.
14. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2010. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting, Report to the European Environmental Agency, Nottingham.
15. Haines-Young R., Potschin M., Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:39-53.
16. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., de Groot R., Verburg P., Heller I., Wascher D., Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management 2009, 44:1099-1120.
17. LfULG, (Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie=Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Ed.), 2007. Bodenatlas des Freistaates Sachsen (Soil atlas of the Free State Saxony)-part 4: Auswertungskarten zum Bodenschutz (Assessment maps for soil protection). [accessed 20.07.12]. http://www.forsten.sachsen.de/umwelt/download/boden/16_Braeunig.pdf.
18. LfULG, 2010. Erosionsschutz in reliefbedingten Abflussbahnen. LfULG-Schriftenreihe 13/2010, [accessed 20.07.12]. http://www.smul.sachsen.de/lfl/publikationen/download/4764_1.pdf.
19. Lyytimaki J., Petersen L.-K., Normander B., Bezak P. Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2008, 5:161-172.
20. Pimentel D., Harvey C., Resosudarmo P., Sinclair K., Kurz D., McNai M., Christ S., Shpritz L., Fitton R., Saffoni R., Blair R. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 1995, 267:1117-1123.
21. Ring I., Hansjürgens B., Elmqvist T., Wittmer H., Sukhdev P. Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Science Direct Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 2:15-26.
22. Rosenberg, M., Syrbe, R.-U., Vowinckel, J., Walz, U., 2013. Scenario technique for the assessment of future landscape developments with the aid of ecosystem services. Landscape Online (submitted).
23. Schneiders A., van Daele T., van Landuyt W., van Reeth W. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: complementary approaches for ecosystem management?. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:123-133.
24. Schwertmann U., Vogl W. Bodenerosion durch Wasser - Vorhersage des Abtrags und Bewertung von Gegenmaßnahmen 1987, Stuttgart, Ulmer.
25. Seppelt R., Fath B., Burkhard B., Fisher J.L., Grêt-Regamey A., Lautenbach S., Pert P., Hotes S., Spangenberg J., Verburg P.H., van Oudenhoven A.P.E. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:145-154.
26. Spangenberg J.H., Settele J. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7:327-337.
27. Staub C., Ott W., Heusi F., Klingler G., Jenny A., Häcki M., Hauser A. Indikatoren für Ökosystemdienstleistungen: Systematik, Methodik und Umsetzungsempfehlung für eine wohlfahrtsbezogene Umweltberichterstattung. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern. Umwelt-Wissen Nr 2011, 1102.
28. Swintona S.M., Lupia F., Robertson G.P., Hamilton S.K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics 2007, 64:245-252.
29. Syrbe R.-U., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:80-88.
30. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan, London and Washington. P. Kumar (Ed.).
31. van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Petz K., Alkemade R., Hein L., de Groot R.S. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 2012, 21:110-122.
32. Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D. Predicting rainfall losses-a guide to conservation planning. Agricultural Handbook 1978, 537. U.S. Dep. Agric., p. 58.