How the ISO 19152 Land Administration Domain Model performs in the comparison of cadastral systems: A case study of condominium/co-ownership in Quebec (Canada) and Alsace Moselle (France)

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 40, Issue , 2013, Pages 68-78

  Pouliot, Jacynthe ^a   Vasseur, Marc ^a   Boubehrezh, Abbas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D cadastre; Comparative analysis; Condominium; Data modeling; Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) specification; Vertical divided co ownership

Indexed keywords

3D CADASTRE; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CONDOMINIUM; DOMAIN MODEL; VERTICAL DIVIDED CO-OWNERSHIP;

DATA STRUCTURES; SPECIFICATIONS;

APARTMENT HOUSES;

CADASTRE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA PROCESSING; GEOMETRY; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDOWNERSHIP; NUMERICAL MODEL; STANDARDIZATION;

ALSACE; CANADA; FRANCE; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84879461626     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AFTopo. (2000). Lexique topographique. Website consulted (30.09.11). http://www.aftopo.org.
2. Civil Code of Québec. (2012). English version. Article 3041, adopted 1991 and updated 2012.. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.
3. da Silva L.F., de Paula V.C.C. Comparative analysis of architectural views based on UML. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 2002, 65(4):12p.
4. Döner F., Thompson R., Stoter J., Lemmen C., Ploeger H., van Oosterom P., et al. 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact - With a case study on utility networks. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:1068-1081.
5. FIG/3D cadastres. (2012). FIG joint commission 3 and working group 7 on 3D cadastres: Work plan 2010-2014. Website consulted (March 2012). http://www.gdmc.nl/3DCadastres/.
6. Graff-Kiehl. (2010). Professional documentation provided by Cabinet Graff-Kiehl. Strasbourg. France.
7. Gross J.L., Yellen J. Handbook of graph theory 2004, CRC Press, 35p.
8. ISO/DIS 19152 LADM. (2011). Geographic information - Land administration domain model. Draft international standard (DIS). (20.01.11). http://www.isotc211.org/protdoc/211n2886/.
9. Kaufmann, J., & Steudler, D. (1998). Cadastre 2014: A vision for a future cadastral system. Report of working group 1 of the FIG commission 7.
10. MRNF. (2003). Instructions pour la présentation des documents cadastraux relatifs à la mise à jour du cadastre du Québec. Le ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec (MRNF), Direction de l'enregistrement cadastral, Gouvernement du Québec. Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, 299p. ISBN: 2-551-21709-1.
11. MRNF. (2012). Spotlight on the cadastral reform. Le ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec (MRNF), Gouvernement du Québec. Website consulted (March 2012). http://www.mrn.gouv.qc.ca/english/land/cadastre/index.jsp.
12. Nosek J.T., Roth I. A comparison of formal knowledge representation schemes as communication tools: Predicate logic vs. semantic network. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1990, 33:227-239.
13. OMG-UML. (2011). Object management group - Unified modeling language. Version 2.4.1. OMG Document Number formal/2011-08-05. (August 2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Infrastructure.
14. Paulsson, J. (2007). 3D property rights - An analysis of key factors based on international experience. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 351p.
15. Pouliot, J., Roy, T., Fouquet-Asselin, G., & Desgroseillers, J. (2010). 3D cadastre in the province of Quebec: A first experiment for the construction of a volumetric representation. In Kolbe, König & Nagel (Eds.), Advances in 3D geo-information sciences. Series: Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 149-162). Berlin, November 3-4.
16. Sowa J.F. Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine 1984, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
17. Stoter, J.E. (2004). 3D cadastre. Delft: Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie (NCG), also 2004, 327 p. (Netherlands Geodetic Commission NCG: Publications on Geodesy: New Series) Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
18. Stoter, J., van Oosterom, P., Ploeger, H., & Aalders, H. (2004). Conceptual 3D cadastral model applied in several countries. FIG working week, Athens, Greece, May 22-27.
19. Stoter J., van Oosterom P. 3D cadastre in an international context: Legal, organizational and technological aspects 2006, Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, New York, 323p. ISBN: 0-8493-3932-4.
20. Urban S.D. & Dietrich, S.W. (2003). Using UML class diagrams for a comparative analysis of relational, object-oriented, and object-relational database mappings. SIGCSE, February 19-23, Reno, Nevada, USA.
21. van Oosterom, P., Stoter, J., Ploeger, H., Thompson, R., & Karki, S. (2011). World-wide inventory of the status of 3D cadastres in 2010 and expectations for 2014. FIG working week 2011, Marrakech, Morocco.