Addressing an inadequacy in quantitative analysis: Examining NMP technology selection

IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 399-415

  Bergmann, Mark ^a   Buehler, Martin G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN UNDERSTANDING; ETHNOGRAPHIC METHODS; FLIGHT VALIDATION; MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY; NEW MILLENNIUM PROGRAMS; QUANTITATIVE APPROACH; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION;

NASA; SPACE FLIGHT;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84879329786     PISSN: 1095323X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2003.1235070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. J. C. Felli, R. E. Kochevar, and B. R. Gritton, Rethinking Project Selection at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, Interfaces, vol. 30, pp. 49-63, 2000.
2. J. Butler, D. J. Morrice, and P. W. Mullarkey, A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection, Management Science, vol. 47, pp. 800-816, 2001.
3. W. D. Cook and R. H. Green, Project Prioritization: A resource-constrained data envelopment analysis approach, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 34, pp. 85-99, 2000.
4. J. J. Jiang and G. Klein, Information system project-selection criteria variations within strategic classes, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 46, pp. 171-176, 1999.
5. G. S. Parnell, H. W. Conley, J. A. Jackson, L. J. Lehmkuhl, and J. M. Andrew, Foundations 2025: A Value Model for Evaluating Future Air and Space Forces, Management Science, vol. 44, pp. 1336-1350, 1998.
6. A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1998.
7. J. E. Orr, Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 1996.
8. V. Bellotti and I. Smith, Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork, presented at Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, 2000.
9. U. Pankoke-Babatz, G. Mark, and K. Klockner, Design in the PoliTeam-project: evaluating user needs in real work practice, presented at DIS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.
10. K. Li, New Millennium Program Plan, NASA, JPL, Pasadena, CA 2000.
11. C. P. Minning, M. G. Buehler, T. Fujita, F. Lansing, G. Man, A. Aljabri, and C. Stevens, Technology Selection and Validation on New Millennium Flight Projects, presented at Aerospace 2000, Big Sky, MT, 2000.
12. S. L. Star and A. Strauss, Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work, JCSCW, vol. 8, pp. 9-30, 1999.
13. R. W. Belk, J. F. Sherry, andM. Wallendorf, A Naturalistic Inquiry to Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 14, pp. 449-470, 1988.
14. Bergman and G. Mark, Exploring the Relationship between Project Selection and Requirements Analysis: An Empirical Study of the New Millennium Program, presented at RE 2002, Essen, Germany, 2002.
15. Space Technology 6 (ST6) Technology Announcement: ST6 Technology Providers, (http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/st6/providers.html'). NASA, 2001.
16. A. Simon, The sciences of the artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.
17. Bergman, J. L. King, and K. Lyytinen, Large Scale Requirements Analysis Revisited: The need for Understanding the Political Ecology of Requirements Engineering, Requirements Engineering Journal, vol. 7, pp. 152-171,2002.
18. A. Neale and M. H. Bazerman, Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York, NY: Free Press, 1991.
19. B. Myerson, Game theory: analysis of conflict, 1st Harvard University Press paperback ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
20. K. E. Weick, Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.