Predicting land use allocation in France: A spatial panel data analysis

Ecological Economics

Volumn 92, Issue , 2013, Pages 114-125

  Chakir, Raja ^a   Le Gallo, Julie ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Land use share model; Panel data; Prediction; Spatial autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DATA SET; DECISION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HETEROGENEITY; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WELFARE REFORM;

FRANCE;

EID: 84879322781     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AGRESTE L'utilisation du territoire en 2003 - nouvelle série 1992 à 2003. Chiffres et Données - Série Agriculture 2004, 157:406-414.
2. AGRESTE Les comptes régionaux et départemtaux de l'agriculture, agreste numérique 2004, CD Rom. Série 1990-2003.
3. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Anselin L. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 2003, 26:153-166.
5. Anselin L., Bera A.K. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics 1998, 237-289.
6. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 1995, John Wiley, New York.
7. Baltagi B.H., Pirotte A. Seemingly unrelated regressions with spatial error components. Empirical Economics 2011, 40(1):5-49.
8. Baltagi, B., Bresson, G., Pirotte, A., forthcoming. Forecasting with spatial panel data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (Available online 30 August 2010).
9. Bell K.P., Irwin E.G. Spatially explicit micro-level modelling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agricultural Economics 2002, 27(3):217-232.
10. Bell K., Rubin J., Boyle K. Economics of Rural Land-Use Change 2006, Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire, England.
11. Bockstael N.E. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78(5):1168-1180.
12. Brady M., Irwin E. Accounting for spatial effects in economic models of land use: recent developments and challenges ahead. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 48(3):487-509.
13. Carrion-Flores C., Irwin E.G. Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2004, 86(4):889-904.
14. Chakir R., Parent O. Determinants of land use changes: a spatial multinomial probit approach. Papers in Regional Science 2009, 88(2).
15. De Pinto A., Nelson G.C. Modelling deforestation and land-use change: sparse data environments. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2007, 58(3):502-516.
16. De Pinto A., Nelson G.C. Land use change with spatially explicit data: a dynamic approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 43:209-229.
17. Hsiao C. Analysis of Panel Data 1986, Cambridge University of Press, New York.
18. INSEE Le zonage en aires urbaines en 1999. Technical report 2001, INSEE Première.
19. INSEE Structuration de l'espace rural: une approche par les bassins de vie. Technical report, Rapport de l'INSEE (avec la participation de IFEN, INRA, SCEES) pour la DATAR 2003.
20. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2004, 34(6):705-725.
21. Irwin E.G., Bell K.P., Geoghegan J. Modeling and managing urban growth at the rural-urban fringe: a parcel-level model of residential land use change. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2003, 32(1):83-102.
22. Kapoor M., Kelejian H., Prucha I. Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. Journal of Econometrics 2007, 140:97-130.
23. Kelejian H., Prucha I. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review 1999, 40:509-533.
24. Kelejian H., Prucha I. Estimation of simultaneous systems of spatially interrelated cross sectional equations. Journal of Econometrics 2004, 118(1-2):27-50.
25. Lee L.-f., Yu J. Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics 2010, 154(2):165-185.
26. Lee L.-f., Yu J. Some recent developments in spatial panel data models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2010, 40(5):255-271. (Advances In Spatial Econometrics).
27. Lee L.-f., Yu J. Spatial Panels: Random Components vs. Fixed Effects 2010, Working paper.
28. Lewis D.J., Plantinga A.J. Policies for habitat fragmentation: COMBINING econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Economics 2007, 83(19):109-127.
29. Lichtenberg E. Land quality, irrigation development, and cropping patterns in the northern high plains. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1989, 71(1):187-194.
30. Lubowski R., Plantinga A., Stavins R. What drives land-use change in the United States? A national analysis of landowner decisions. Land Economics 2008, 84(4):551-572.
31. Miller D.J., Plantinga A.J. Modeling land use decisions with aggregate data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1999, 81(1):180-194.
32. Pace K. Spatial statistics toolbox http://www.spatial-statistics.com.
33. Plantinga A.J. The effect of agricultural policies on land use and environmental quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78(4):1082-1091.
34. Plantinga A.J., Ahn S. Efficient policies for environmental protection: an econometric analysis of incentives for land conversion and retention. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2002, 27(1):128-145.
35. Plantinga A., Irwin E. Overview of empirical methods. Economics of Rural Land-Use Change 2006, Ashgate Publishing. K.P. Bell, K.J. Boyle, J. Rubin (Eds.).
36. Plantinga A., Mauldin T., Miller D. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1999, 81:812-824.
37. Stavins R.N., Jaffe A.B. Unintended impacts of public investments on private decisions: the depletion of forested wetlands. The American Economic Review 1990, 80(3):337-352.
38. Von Thünen J.H. Der isolierte staat in beziehung der landwirtschaft undnationalökonomie. Von Thünen's Isolated State 1966, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K. P. Hall (Ed.).
39. Wu J., Segerson K. The impact of policies and land characteristics on potential groundwater pollution in Wisconsin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1995, 77(4):1033-1047.