EU ETS market interactions: The case for multiple hypothesis testing approaches

Applied Energy

Volumn 111, Issue , 2013, Pages 701-709

  Cummins, Mark ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

CERs; EU Emissions Trading Scheme; EUAs; Granger causality; Multiple hypothesis testing; Vector autoregression

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTERNATIONAL LAW; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CERS; EU EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; EUAS; GRANGER CAUSALITY; MULTIPLE HYPOTHESIS TESTING; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS;

GAS EMISSIONS;

EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; EUROPEAN UNION; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; HYPOTHESIS TESTING;

EID: 84879292203     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.032     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kossoy A, Guigon, P. State and trends of the carbon markets 2012. World bank report; 2012.
2. Romano JP, Shaikh AM, Wolf M. Hypothesis testing in econometrics. Working paper; 2009.
3. White H. A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica 2000, 68:1097-1126.
4. Hansen P.R. A test for superior predictive ability. J Business Econom Stat 2005, 23:365-380.
5. Romano J.P., Wolf M. Control of generalized error rates in multiple testing. Ann Stat 2007, 35:1378-1408.
6. Romano J.P., Wolf M. Balanced control of generalized error rates. Ann Stat 2010, 38:598-633.
7. Sullivan R., Timmermann A., White H. Data-snooping, technical trading rule performance, and the bootstrap. J Finan 1999, 54:1647-1691.
8. Hsu PH, Kuan CM. Re-examining the profitability of technical analysis with White's reality check. Working paper; 2005.
9. Qui M., Wu Y. Technical trading-rule profitability, data snooping, and reality check: evidence from the foreign exchange market. J Money, Credit, Banking 2006, 38:2135-2158.
10. Park C.H., Irwin S.H. What do we know about the profitability of technical analysis?. J Econom Surveys 2007, 21:786-826.
11. Marshall BR, Cahan RH, Cahan JM. Can commodity futures be profitably traded with quantitative market timing strategies? Working paper; 2008.
12. Cummins M., Bucca A. Quantitative spread trading in the crude oil and products markets. Quant Finan 2012, 12(12):1857-1875.
13. Zetterberg L, Nilsson K, Ahman M, Kumlin A, Birgersdotter L. Analysis of national allocation plans for the EU ETS. IVL Swedish environmental research institute report; 2004.
14. Betz R., Sato M. Emissions trading: Lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. Climate Policy 2006, 6:351-359.
15. Grubb M., Neuhoff K. Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview. Climate Policy 2006, 6(1):7-30.
16. Hepburn C., Grubb M., Neuhoff K., Matthes F., Tse M. Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why. Climate Policy 2006, 6(1):137-160.
17. Neuhoff K., Keats K., Sato M. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy 2006, 6:73-92.
18. Convery F., Redmond L. Market and price developments in the European Union emissions trading scheme. Rev Environ Econom Policy 2007, 1:88-111.
19. Ellerman A., Buchner B. Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005-2006 emissions data. Environ Resour Econom 2008, 41:267-287.
20. Feng Z.H., Zou L.L., Wei Y.M. Carbon price volatility: evidence from EU ETS. Appl Energy 2011, 88(3):590-598.
21. Feng Z.H., Wei Y.M., Wang K. Estimating risk for the carbon market via extreme value theory: an empirical analysis of the EU ETS. Appl Energy 2012, 99:97-108.
22. Mansanet-Bataller M., Pardo A., Valor E. CO2 prices, energy and weather. Energy J 2007, 28:73-92.
23. Alberola E., Chevalier J., Cheze B. Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007. Energy Policy 2008, 36:787-797.
24. 2 prices. J Energy Markets 2009, 2:1-33.
25. 2 emission allowances. Energy Econom 2009, 31:4-15.
26. Zhang Y.J., Wei Y.M. An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 2010, 87(6):1804-1814.
27. Boutaba M. Dynamic linkages among European carbon markets: insights on price transmission. Working paper; 2008.
28. Nazifi F. Modeling the price spread between the EUA and the CER carbon prices. Working paper; 2010.
29. Chevallier J. EUAs and CERs: vector autoregression, impulse response function and cointegration analysis. Econom Bullet 2010, 30:558-576.
30. 2, electricity, and other energy variables during phases I and II of the EU ETS. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3329-3341.
31. Carchano O, Medina V, Pardo A. Rolling over EUAs and CERs. Working paper; 2012.
32. Mansanet M., Chevallier J., Hervé M., Alberola E. EUA and sCER Phase II price drivers: unveiling the reasons for the existence of the EUA-sCER spread. Energy Policy 2011, 39:1056-1069.
33. Chevallier J. A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics. Energy Econom 2011, 33(6):1295-1312.
34. Mansanet-Bataller M., Pardo A. CO2 prices and portfolio management. Int J Global Energy Issues 2011, 35:154-177.
35. Chevallier J. Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors: a view from the EU ETS. Energy Econ 2009, 31(4):614-625.
36. 2 emission allowance prices and derivatives: evidence from the European trading scheme. J Bank Finan 2009, 33(7):1230-1241.
37. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979, 6:65-70.
38. Lehmann E.L., Romano J.P. Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann Stat 2005, 33(3):1138-1154.
39. Romano JP, Shaikh AM. On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion. In Rojo J, editor. 2nd Lehmann symposium - optimality IMS lecture notes-monograph series, 2006. p. 33-50.