-
1
-
-
48849113355
-
An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale
-
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T. and Miller, J.T. (2008) An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 24, 574-594.
-
(2008)
Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact
, vol.24
, pp. 574-594
-
-
Bangor, A.1
Kortum, P.T.2
Miller, J.T.3
-
2
-
-
84879222541
-
Creating a short Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) scale
-
Bosley, J. J. (2013) Creating a Short Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) Scale. Interact. Comput., 25, 317-319.
-
(2013)
Interact. Comput
, vol.25
, pp. 317-319
-
-
Bosley, J.J.1
-
3
-
-
0002020833
-
SUS:A 'quick and dirty' usability scale
-
Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B.,Weerdmeester, B.A. and McClelland,A.L. (eds.) Taylor and Francis, London
-
Brooke, J. (1996) SUS:A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale. In Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B.,Weerdmeester, B.A. and McClelland,A.L. (eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, London.
-
(1996)
Usability Evaluation in Industry
-
-
Brooke, J.1
-
4
-
-
84879212620
-
A commentary on short questionnaires for assessing usability
-
Cairns, P. (2013)ACommentary on Short Questionnaires forAssessing Usability. Interact. Comput., 25, 312-316.
-
(2013)
Interact. Comput
, vol.25
, pp. 312-316
-
-
Cairns, P.1
-
5
-
-
0000472490
-
The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review
-
Cox III, E.P. (1980) The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. J. Market. Res., 17, 407-422.
-
(1980)
J. Market. Res
, vol.17
, pp. 407-422
-
-
Cox Iii., E.P.1
-
6
-
-
0027243714
-
Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility
-
Diefenbach, M.A.,Weinstein, N.D. and O'Reilly, J. (1993) Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ. Res., 8, 181-192.
-
(1993)
Health Educ. Res
, vol.8
, pp. 181-192
-
-
Diefenbach, M.A.1
Weinstein, N.D.2
O'Reilly, J.3
-
7
-
-
79958145353
-
Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales
-
Finstad, K. (2010a) Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. J. Usability Stud., 5, 104-110.
-
(2010)
J. Usability Stud
, vol.5
, pp. 104-110
-
-
Finstad, K.1
-
8
-
-
77955429964
-
The usability metric for user experience
-
Finstad, K. (2010b) The Usability Metric for User Experience. Interact. Comput., 22, 323-327.
-
(2010)
Interact. Comput
, vol.22
, pp. 323-327
-
-
Finstad, K.1
-
9
-
-
34548085600
-
Methods for evaluating user interfaces
-
School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences University of Sussex
-
Holyer, A. (1993) Methods for evaluating user interfaces. Cognitive Science Research Paper No. 301,School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.
-
(1993)
Cognitive Science Research Paper No. 301
-
-
Holyer, A.1
-
10
-
-
84879208055
-
Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability
-
ISO 9241-11 Version 9 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
-
ISO 9241-11 (1998) Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability. JMP® Pro, Version 9. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2010.
-
(1998)
JMP® Pro
, pp. 1989-2010
-
-
-
11
-
-
84879219926
-
Critical review of 'the usability metric for user experience'
-
Lewis, J. R. (2013) Critical Review of 'The Usability Metric for User Experience'. Interact. Comput., 25, 320-324.
-
(2013)
Interact. Comput
, vol.25
, pp. 320-324
-
-
Lewis, J.R.1
-
12
-
-
79958170219
-
The factor structure of the system usability scale
-
Kuroso M. (ed.) Berlin: Springer
-
Lewis, J.R. and Sauro, K. (2009) The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In Kuroso, M. (ed.), Human-Centered Design. Berlin: Springer.
-
(2009)
Human-Centered Design
-
-
Lewis, J.R.1
Sauro, K.2
-
13
-
-
85126493674
-
ISO standards and enterprise software: A case study using SUMI and SUS in an International Sale
-
Marcus, A. (ed.) Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice Springer, Berlin
-
Ohgi, J. and Sauro, J. (2011) ISO standards and enterprise software: A case study using SUMI and SUS in an International Sale. In Marcus, A. (ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice. Springer, Berlin.
-
(2011)
Design, User Experience, and Usability
-
-
Ohgi, J.1
Sauro, J.2
-
14
-
-
84857606482
-
Measuring usability with the system usability scal
-
Retrieved 24 April 2012, from
-
Sauro, J. (2011) Measuring usability with the system usability scale. Measuring Usability. Retrieved 24 April 2012, from http://www. measuringusability.com/sus.php.
-
(2011)
Measuring Usability
-
-
Sauro, J.1
-
15
-
-
84892451643
-
Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: Evidence for the construct of usability
-
Sauro, J. and Lewis, J.R. (2009) Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: Evidence for the construct of usability. In Proc.ACMCHI 2009 Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst. 2009, pp. 1609-1618.
-
(2009)
Proc.ACMCHI 2009 Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst 2009
, pp. 1609-1618
-
-
Sauro, J.1
Lewis, J.R.2
-
16
-
-
85028506646
-
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
-
Tavakol, M. and Dennick, R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ., 2, 53-55.
-
(2011)
Int. J. Med. Educ
, vol.2
, pp. 53-55
-
-
Tavakol, M.1
Dennick, R.2
-
17
-
-
77649336899
-
A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability
-
7-11 June 2004
-
Tullis, T.S. and Stetson, J.N. (2004) A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In Proc. UPA 2004, 7-11 June 2004.
-
(2004)
Proc. UPA 2004
-
-
Tullis, T.S.1
Stetson, J.N.2
|