Simulation of active skeletal muscle tissue with a transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic continuum material model

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 227, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 571-580

  Khodaei, Hamid ^a   Mostofizadeh, Salar ^a   Brolin, Karin ^a   Johansson, Hakan ^a   Osth, Jonas ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Animal model; Finite element; Hyperelasticity; Muscle activation; Transversely isotropy; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STRAIN RATE; VISCOELASTICITY; CRASHWORTHINESS; MUSCLE; TISSUE;

ACTIVATION CAPABILITY; ANIMAL MODEL; EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT CODES; HYPER-ELASTICITY; MUSCLE ACTIVATION; NEW ZEALAND RABBITS; TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC; TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPY;

MUSCLE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84879239697     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411913476640     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Jost G, Popolizio M, Allsop R and Eksler V. Countdown to 2010 only two more years to act! 2nd Road Safety PIN Report. European Transport Safety Council, Belgium, 2008.
2. Leonard B. EU energy and transport in figures. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.
3. European Commission (EC). White paper: European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Brussels: European Commission, 2001.
4. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, et al. World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
5. Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC). October 2008, Detroit, MI: Global Human Body Models Consortium, http://www.ghbmc.com/(2008, accessed December 2012).
6. Fung Y. Biomechanics -mechanical properties of living tissues. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
7. Herzog W and Nigg B. Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2007.
8. Hedenstierna S, Halldin P and Brolin K. Evaluation of a combination of continuum and truss finite elements in a model of passive and active muscle tissue. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008; 11: 627-639.
9. Sugiyama T, Nakahira Y and Iwamoto M. Development of an active human FE model with 3D geometry of muscles for crash analysis. In: VI World Congress of Biomechanics, Singapore, IFMBE (International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering), Berlin, 1-6 August 2010.
10. Myers B, Van Ee C, Camacho D, et al. On the structural and material properties of mammalian skeletal muscle and its relevance to human cervical impact dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 39th Stapp Car Crash conference, 1995, SAE 952723, pp.203-214.
11. Myers B, Woolley C, Slotter T, et al. The influence of strain rate on the passive and stimulated engineering stress-large strain behavior of the rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech Eng 1998; 120: 126-132.
12. Lu Y, Zhu H, Richmond S, et al. A visco-hyperelastic model for skeletal muscle tissue under high strain rates. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2629-2632.
13. Johansson T, Meier P and Blickhan R. A finite-element model for the mechanical analysis of skeletal muscles. J Theor Biol 2000; 206: 131-149.
14. Martins J, Pato M and Pires E. A finite element model of skeletal muscles. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2006; 1: 159-170.
15. Oomens C, Maenhout M, Van Oijen C, et al. Finite element modelling of contracting skeletal muscle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358: 1453-1460.
16. Almeida E and Spilker R. Mixed and penalty finite element models for the nonlinear behavior of biphasic soft tissues in finite deformation: part I -alternate formulations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1997; 1: 25-46.
17. Freed A, Einstein D and Vesely I. Invariant formulation for dispersed transverse isotropy in aortic heart valves. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2005; 4: 100-117.
18. Limbert G and Middleton J. A transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic material: application to the modeling of biological soft connective tissues. Int J Solids Struct 2004; 41: 4237-4260.
19. Huxley A. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 1957; 7: 255-318.
20. Hill A. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1938; 126: 136-195.
21. Hill A. First and last experiments in muscle mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
22. Van den Bogert A, Gerritsen K and Cole G. Human muscle modelling from a user's perspective. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1998; 8: 119-124.
23. Winters J and Stark L. Analysis of fundamental human movement patterns through the use of in-depth antagonistic muscle models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32: 826-839.
24. Wittek A and Kajzer J. Modelling of muscle influence on the kinematics of the head-neck complex in impacts. Mem Sch Eng Nagoya Univ 1997; 49: 155-205.
25. Zajac F. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1989; 17: 359-411.
26. Ogden R. Large deformation isotropic elasticity-on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 1972; 326: 565-584.
27. Bol M and Reese S. Micromechanical modelling of skeletal muscles based on the finite element method. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008; 11: 489-504.
28. Belytschko T, Liu WK and Moran B. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2000.
29. Holzapfel G and Weizsacker H. Biomechanical behavior of the arterial wall and its numerical characterization. Comput Biol Med 1998; 28: 377-392.
30. Brink U and Stein E. On some mixed finite element methods for incompressible and nearly incompressible finite elasticity. Comput Mech 1996; 19: 105-119.
31. Olsson T. A new material model in LS-DYNA: an anisotropic dispersed fiber model with activation. Document no. 09028, Revision 2, 14th September 2009. Linkoping: Engineering Research Nordic AB.
32. Billiar K and Sacks M. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp -part II: a structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 327-335.
33. Davis J, Kaufman K and Lieber R. Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 2003; 36: 505-512.
34. Blemker S, Pinsky P and Delp S. A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii. J Biomech 2005; 38: 657-665.
35. Winters J and Stark L. Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J Biomech 1988; 21: 1027-1041.
36. Van der Horst M. Human head neck response in frontal, lateral and rear end impact loading: modelling and validation. Doctoral Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2002.
37. Murtada S, Kroon M and Holzapfel G. A calcium-driven mechanochemical model for prediction of force generation in smooth muscle. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2010; 9: 749-762.
38. Hallquist J. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.
39. Rehorn M and Blemker S. The effects of aponeurosis geometry on strain injury susceptibility explored with a 3D muscle model. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2574-2581.
40. Gras L, Laporte S, Mitton D, et al. Tensile tests on a muscle: influence of experimental conditions and of velocity on its passive response. In: IRCOBI conference, Dublin, Ireland, IRCOBI (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury), Zurich, 12-14 September 2012.