Evaluation of long-term function, complications, quality of life and health status after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo neo rectal and with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Heikens, J T ^a,b   de Vries, J ^b,c   de Jong, D J ^a   den Oudsten, B L ^b,c   Hopman, W ^a   Groenewoud, J M M ^a   van der Kolk, M B ^a   Gooszen, H G ^a   van Laarhoven, C J H M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complications; Function; Proctocolectomy; Quality of life; Restorative surgery; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; COLON FISTULA; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION; DYSPAREUNIA; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; ILEITIS; ILEO NEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONSET AGE; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEPSIS; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; COLONIC POUCHES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POUCHITIS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84879236181     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12175     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 120-7.
2. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG et al. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 333-40.
3. de Zeeuw S, Ahmed AU, Donders RA et al. Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 843-53.
4. Hueting WE, Buskens E, van de Tweel I, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9, 317 patients. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 69-79.
5. Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 310-20.
6. Heikens JT, de Vries J, van Laarhoven CJ. Quality of life, health related quality of life and health status in patients having restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 536-44.
7. van Laarhoven CJ, Andriesse GI, Back WA et al. The ileo neorectal anastomosis: an experimental study on development of the surgical technique and theoretical background. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 82-94.
8. Brody GS, McCorriston JR. Experimental transplantation of small bowel mucosa to the rectum. Plast Reconstr Surg 1961; 28: 12-25.
9. Peck DA, Hallenbeck GA. Fecal continence in the dog after replacement of rectal mucosa with ileal mucosa. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1964; 119: 1312-20.
10. van Laarhoven CJ, Andriesse GI, Schipper ME et al. Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 750-7.
11. Andriesse GI, Gooszen HG, Schipper ME et al. Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study. Gut 2001; 48: 683-9.
12. Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP et al. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 1991; 110: 718-24.
13. Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Anal sensation after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 993-6.
14. Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Lewis WG, Williamson M, Johnston D. Internal anal sphincter activity after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 32-6.
15. da Silva HJ, de Angelis CP, Soper N et al. Clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1039-44.
16. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 470-4.
17. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77-80.
18. Bharucha AE, Seide B, Fox JC, Zinsmeister AR. Day-to-day reproducibility of anorectal sensorimotor assessments in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 241-50.
19. Felt-Bersma RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SG. Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 479-85.
20. Felt-Bersma RJ, Meuwissen SG. Anal manometry. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990; 5: 170-3.
21. Felt-Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meuwissen SG. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 1991; 38: 444-9.
22. Goslings JC, Gouma DJ. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 2008; 32: 952.
23. Roukema JA, van der WC, Leenen LP. Registration of postoperative complications to improve the results of surgery. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996; 14: 781-4.
24. Litzelman K, Barker E, Catrine K et al. Socioeconomic disparities in the quality of life in children with cancer or brain tumors: the mediating role of family factors. Psychooncology 2012; [Epub ahead of print].
25. Son YJ, Song Y, Nam S et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in elderly Korean patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012; 27: 528-38.
26. De Vries J, Van Heck GL. (1995) De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-100 [The Dutch version of the WHOQOL-100]. Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
27. The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1569-85.
28. O'Carroll RE, Smith K, Couston M, Cossar JA, Hayes PC. A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 121-4.
29. Power M, Harper A, Bullinger M. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 495-505.
30. de Vries J, van Heck GL. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100): validation study with the Dutch version. Eur J Psychol Assess 1997; 18: 495-505.
31. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993; 2: 217-27.
32. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-63.
33. Bowling A. (1991) Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
34. Van der Zee KI, Sandermann R. (1993) Het Meten van de Algemene Gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. [Measuring health status with the RAND-36]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands.
35. van Laarhoven CJ, Hueting WE, Schipper ME et al. Ileo-neorectal anastomosis: medium- and long-term follow-up of 37 patients. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 371-8.
36. Heikens JT, Gooszen HG, Teepen JL et al. The ileo neo rectal anastomosis: long-term results of surgical innovation in patients after ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 111-8.
37. de Zeeuw S, Ahmed AU, van der Kolk MB, van Laarhoven KC. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis with close rectal dissection using automated vessel sealers for ulcerative colitis: a promising alternative. Dig Surg 2011; 28: 345-51.