A gentle critique of the Greenhouse Development Rights framework

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 225-231

  Shockley, Kenneth E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREENHOUSES;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; HISTORICAL EMISSIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ETHICS; INDIVIDUALISM;

EID: 84879229202     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.215     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baer P. The Greenhouse Development Rights framework for global burden sharing: reflection on principles and prospects. WIREs: Clim Change 2013, 4(1):61-71.
2. Page E. Climatic justice and the fair distribution of atmospheric burdens: a conjunctive account. Monist 2011, 94:412-432.
3. Broome J. Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. New York: W. W. Norton & Co; 2012.
4. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S, Kemp-Benedict E. Greenhouse development rights: a proposal for a fair global climate treaty. Ethics Place Environ 2009, 12:267-281.
5. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S, Kemp-Benedict E. The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework: The Right to Develop in a Climate Constrained World. 2nd ed. Berlin and Albany, CA: Heinrich Boll Foundation, Christian Aid, EcoEquity, and the Stockholm Environment Institute; 2008.
6. Keulartz J. A simple metric for fair burden sharing? Ethics Place Environ 2009, 12:297-300.
7. United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development. Available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/41/a41r128.htm. (Accessed September 10 2012).
8. Brundtland H. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press (for the World Commission on Environment and Development); 1987.
9. Kyoto Protocol. Available at: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php. (Accessed October 11 2012).
10. Sen A. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009.
11. Anderson E. Justifying the capabilities approach to justice. In: Harry Bridgehouse H, Robeyns I, Ingrid Robeyns, eds. Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010, 81-100.
12. Sen A. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books; 2000.
13. Nussbaum M. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2006.
14. Laderchi C. "Do concepts matter"? An empirical investigation of the differences between a capability and a monetary assessment of poverty". In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, eds. The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008, 203-241.
15. United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Available at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. (Accessed October 11 2012).
16. Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, et al., eds. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1-19. Available at: http://ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/. (Accessed September 30 2012).
17. Shockley K. Divergent principles, development rights, and individualism in the Greenhouse Development Rights framework. Regions and Cohesions 2012, 2.1:1-24.
18. Taylor C. Irreducibly social goods. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995, 27-145.
19. Schlosberg D. Capacity and capabilities: a response to the Greenhouse Development Rights framework. Ethics Place Environ 2009, 12:287-290.
20. Schlosberg D. Justice, ecological integrity, and climate change. In: Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J, eds. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012, 165-183.
21. Shockley K. Human values and institutional responses to climate change. In: Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J, eds. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012, 281-297.
22. Holland B. Environment as meta-capability: Why a dignified human life requires a stable climate system. In: Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J, eds. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012, 145-164.
23. Hourdequin M. Revising responsibility in a proposal for greenhouse development rights. Ethics Place Environ 2009, 12:291-295.
24. Moellendorf D. A right to sustainable development. Monist 2011, 94.3:433-452.
25. Vanderheiden S. Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
26. Vanderheiden S. Distinguishing mitigation and adaptation. Ethics Place Environ 2009, 12:283-286.
27. Shue H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law and Policy, 1993, 15: 39-59. Reprinted in Gardiner. In: Caney S, Jamieson S, Shue S, eds. H Climate Ethics: Essential Reading. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010, 200-214.
28. Holland B. Justice and the environment in Nussbaum's "capabilities approach": why sustainable ecological capacity is a meta-capability. Polit Res Q 2008, 61:319-332.
29. Shue H. Deadly delays, saving opportunities: creating a more dangerous world? In: Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson S, Shue H, eds. Climate Ethics: Essential Reading. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010, 146-162.
30. Jagers SC, Duus-Otterström G. Dual climate change responsibility: on moral divergences between mitigation and adaptation. Env Polit 2008, 17:576-591.