Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 472-477

  Dawes, Piers ^a   Hopkins, Rachel ^a   Munro, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hearing aid trial; Placebo effect; Reliability

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATIENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PLACEBO EFFECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERY ELDERLY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORRECTION OF HEARING IMPAIRMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERSONS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; PLACEBO EFFECT; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84879227853     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.783718     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arlinger S., Billermark E., Oberg M., Lunner T. & Hellgren J. 1998. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid. Scand Audiol, 27, 51-61.
2. Beecher H.K. 1955. The powerful placebo. JAMA, 159, 1602-1606.
3. Bench J., Kowal A. & Bamford J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. The British Journal of Audiology, 13, 108-112.
4. Benedetti F. 2009. Placebo Effects. Understanding the Mechanisms in Health and Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Benedetti F. 2011. The Patient ' s Brain. The Neuroscience Behind the Doctor Patient Relationship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Benedetti F., Lanotte M., Lopiano L. & Colloca L. 2007. When words are painful: Unravelling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Neuroscience, 147, 260-271.
7. Bentler R.A., Neibuhr D.P., Johnson T.A. & Flamme G.A. 2003. Impact of digital labelling on outcome measures. Ear Hear, 24, 215-224.
8. Colloca L., Lopiano L., Lanotte M. & Benedetti F. 2004. Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson ' s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 3, 679-684.
9. Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 1995. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16.
10. Dawes P., Powell S. & Munro K.J. 2011. The placebo effect and the infl uence of participant expectation on hearing aid trials. Ear Hear, 32, 767-774.
11. De Pascalis V., Chiaradia C. & Carotenuto E. 2002. The contribution of suggestibility and expectation to placebo analgesia and phenomenon in an experimental setting. Pain, 96, 393-402.
12. Dimons E.G., Kittle C.F. & Crockett J.E. 1960. Comparison of internal mammary ligation and sham operation for angina pectoralis. Am J Cardiol, 5, 483-486.
13. Finniss D.G., Kaptchuk T.J., Miller F. & Benedetti F. 2011. Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. The Lancet, 375, 686-695.
14. Foster J.R. & Haggard M.P. 1987. The four alternative auditory feature test of speech perception (FAAF): Linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 165-174.
15. Geers A., Weiland P.E., Kosab K., Landry S.J. & Helfer S.G. 2005. Goal activation, expectations and the placebo effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 143-159.
16. Glasziou P., Chalmers I., Rawlins M. & McCulloch P. 2007. When are randomized trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. BMJ, 334, 349-351.
17. Gong L., Zhang W., Zhu J., Kong D., Page V. et al. 1996. Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE). Journal of Hypertension, 14, 1237-1245.
18. Gracely R.H., Dubner R., Deeter W.R. & Wolskee P.J. 1985. Clinician ' s expectations infl uence placebo analgesia. Lancet, 1, 43.
19. Liberman R. 1964. An experimental study of the placebo response under three different situations of pain. J Psychiatr Res, 2, 233-246.
20. Luparello T., Lyons H.A., Bleecker E.R. & McFadden E.R. 1968. Infl uences of suggestion on airway reactivity in asthmatic subjects. Psychosomatic Medicine, 30, 819-825.
21. McNair D.M., Gardos G., Haskell D.S. & Fisher S. 1979. Placebo response, placebo effect, and two attributes. Psychopharmacology, 63, 245-250.
22. Newcorn J.H., Sutton V.K., Zhang S., Wilens T., Kratochvil C. et al. 2009. Characteristics of placebo responders in pediatric clinical trials of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 48, 1165-1172.
23. Price D.D., Finniss D.G. & Benedetti F. 2008. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: Recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol, 59, 565-590.
24. Rosenthal R. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. In: H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 231-244.
25. Shapiro A.K. & Shapiro E. 1984. Patient-provider relationships and the placebo effect. In: J.D. Matarazzo, S.M. Weiss, J.A. Herd & N.E. Miller (eds.), Behavioral Heath: A Handbook of Health Enhancement. New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 371-383.
26. Thompson W.G. 2000. Placebos: A review of the placebo response. Am J Gastroenterol, 95, 1637-1614.
27. Turner J.A., Deyo R.A., Loeser J.D., Von Korff M. & Fordyce W.E. 1994. The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. JAMA, 271, 1609-1614.
28. Tyler R.S., Haskell G.B., Preece J. & Bergan B.A. 2001. Nurturing patient expectations to enhance the treatment of tinnitus. The Hearing Journal, 22, 15-21.
29. Valente M., Fabry D.A., Potts L.G. & Sandlin R.E. 1998. Comparing the performance of the Widex SENSE digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 342-360.
30. Wood S.A. & Lutman M.E. 2004. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 43, 144-155.