Log-shape ratios, Procrustes superimposition, elliptic Fourier analysis: Three worked examples in R

Hystrix

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Claude, Mien ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Asia; Morphometries; R; Rattus; Rodents

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879189157     PISSN: 03941914     EISSN: 18255272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6316     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams D.C., Otarola-Castillo E., 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 393-399. [R package version 1.0] http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geomorph/index.html
2. Adams D., Rohlf F.J., 2000. Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechan-ical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 97: 4106-4111.
3. Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., 2004. Geometric morphometries: ten years of progress following the revolution. It. J. Zool. 71: 5-16.
4. Aplin K.R, Suzuki H., Alejandro A., Chinen A.A., Chesser R.T., ten Have J., Donnellan S.C., Austin J., Frost A., Gonzales J.R, Herbreteau V., Catzeflis F, Soubrier J., Fang Y.-R, Robins J., Matisoo-Smith E., Bastos A.D.S., Maryanto I., Sinaga M.H., Denys C, Van Den Bussche R., Conroy C, Rowe K., Cooper A., 2011. Multiple geographic origins of commensalism and complex dispersal history of black rats. Plos ONE, 6(11): e26357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026357
5. Arbour J., Brown C, 2012. LOST: Missing morphometric data simulation and estimation. [R package version 1.0] http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LOST/index.html
6. Auffray J.-C, Blasdell K., Bordes F, Chabe M., Chaisiri K., Charbonnel N, Chaval Y., Claude J., Cosson, J.-F, Dei-Cas E., Desquesnes M., Dobigny G, Douangboupha B., Galan M., Haukisalmi V., Henttonen H., Herbreteau V., Hugot J.-R, Jiyipong T., Latinne A., Michaux J., Milocco C, Morand S., Pages M., Phoophitpong D., Pumhom P., Ribas Salvador A., Soonchan S., Suputtamongkol Y, Waengsothorn S., Waywa D., Xuereb A., 2011. Protocols for Field and Laboratory Rodent Studies. Kasetsart University Press.
7. Bonhomme V., Picq S., Claude J., 2013. Momocs: Shape Analysis of Outlines. [R package version 0.2-02] http://vincentbonhomme.fr/momocs/
8. Bookstein F.L., 1990. Introduction to methods for landmark data. In: Rohlf F.J., Book-stein FL. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometric Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publication 2. 215-226.
9. Bookstein F.L., 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Bookstein F.L., 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometries. In: Marcus L.F, Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G.J.P., Slice D., Bookstein FL. (Eds.) Advances in Morphometries. NATO ASI Series. Plenum Press, New York. 131-152.
11. Brown C, Arbour J., Jackson D., 2012. Testing of the effect of missing data estimation and distribution in morphometric multivariate data analyses. Systematic Biology 61: 941-956.
12. Burnaby T.P., 1966. Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics 22: 96-110.
13. Cardini A., Nagorsen D., O'Higgins P., Polly P.D., Thorington J., Tongiorgi P., 2009. Detecting biological distinctiveness using geometric morphometries: an example case from the Vancouver island marmot. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 21: 209-223.
14. Chiari Y, Claude J., 2012. Morphometric identification of individuals when there are more shape variables than reference specimens: a case study in galapagos tortoises. Comptes rendus Biologies 335: 62-68.
15. Claude J., 2008. Modern Morphometries with R. Springer, New York.
16. Claude J., Paradis E., Tong H., Auffray J.-C, 2003. A geometric morphometric assessment of the effects of environment and cladogenesis on the evolution of the turtle shell. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 485-501.
17. Claude J., Pritchard P., Tong H., Paradis E., Auffray J.-C, 2004. Ecological correlates and evolutionary divergence in the skull of turtles: a geometric morphometric assessment. Systematic Biology 53: 933-948.
18. Corbet G.B., Hill J.E., 1992. The Mammals of the Indomalayan Region: a systematic review. Natural History Museum Publications, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Corti M., Marcus L., Hingst-Zaher E., 2000. Introduction to the Symposium: Geometric morphometries in mammalogy. Hystrix 11(1): 3-7. doi:10.4404/hystrix-ll.l-4133
20. Dryden I.E., 2013. Shapes: Statistical shape analysis. [R package version 1.1-6] http://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/-ild/shapes
21. Dryden I.E., Mardia K.V, 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
22. Fox J., 2005. The R commander: A basic-statistics graphical user interface to R. Journal of Statistical Software, 14(9): 1-42.
23. Goodall C.R., 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 53: 285-339.
24. Guillot G., Renaud S., Ledevin R., Michaux J., Claude J., 2012. A Unifying Model for the Analysis of Phenotypic, Genetic and Geographic Data. Systematic Biology 61(5): 897-911.
25. Kendall D., 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16: 81-121.
26. Klingenberg C.P., Mclntyre G.S., 1998. Geometric morphometries of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 54(4): 1363-1375.
27. Kuhl FP, Giardina C.R., 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18: 236-258.
28. Lack J.B., Greene D.U., Conroy C.J., Hamilton M.J., Braun J.K., Mares M.A., Van Den Bussche R.A., 2012. Invasion facilitates hybridization with introgression in the Rattus rattus species complex. Molecular Ecology 21(14): 3545-3561.
29. nd edition. Darnsutha Press, Thailand.
30. Lerdthusnee K., Nigro J., Monkanna T, Leepitakrat W., Leepitakrat S., Insuan S., Char-oensongsermkit W., Khlaimanee N, Akkagraisee W., Chayapum K., Jones J., 2008. Surveys of rodent-borne disease in Thailand with a focus on scrub typhus assessment. Integrative Zoology 3: 267-273.
31. Loy A., Capanna E., 1998. A parapatric contact area between two species of moles (genus Talpa): character displacement investigated through the geometric morphometric of skull. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44(1-2): 151-164.
32. Loy A., Corti M., Marcus L.F, 1993. Landmark data: Size and shape analysis in system-atics. A case study on old world talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora). In: Marcus L.F, Bello E., Garcia-Valdecasas A. (Eds.) Contribution to Morphometries. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. 215-240.
33. Macholan M., 2006. A geometric morphometric analysis of the shape of the first upper molar in mice of the genus Mus (Muridae, Rodentia). Journal of Zoology 270: 672-681.
34. Mosimann J.E., 1970. Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 930-948.
35. Motokawa M., Lin L.-K., Lu K.-H., 2004. Geographic variation in cranial features of the polynesian rat Rattus exulans (Peole, 1848) (Mammalia: Rodentia: Muridae). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 52(2): 653-663.
36. Pages M., Bazin E., Galan M., Chaval Y, Claude J., Herbreteau V., Michaux J., Piry S., Morand S., Cosson J.-R, 2013. Cytonuclear discordance among southeast asian black rats (Rattus rattus complex). Molecular Ecology 22: 1019-1034.
37. Pages M., Chaval Y., Herbreteau V., Waengsothorn S., Cosson J.-F., Hugot J.-P., Morand S., Michaux J., 2010. Revisiting the taxonomy of the Rattini tribe: a phylogeny-based delimitation of species boundaries. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 184.
38. Paradis E., (2005). R for beginners. Available online at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Paradis-rdebuts_en.pdf
39. R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
40. Rohlf F.J., 2013. TpsDIG2: Digitize landmarks & outlines from image files, scanner, or video. Available online at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/soft-dataacq.html
41. Rohlf F. J., Archie A.W., 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Cuculidae). Systematic Zoology 33(3): 302-317.
42. Rohlf F.J., Marcus L.F., 1993. Arevolution in morphometries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8(4): 129-132.
43. Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., 1990. Extension of the Procrustes method for the optimal superim-position of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
44. Rowe K.C., Aplin K.P, Braverstock PR., Moritz C, 2011. Recent and rapid speciation with limited morphological disparity in the genus Rattus. Systematic Biology 60: 188-203.
45. Schlager S., 2013. Morpho: Calculations and visualizations related to Geometric Morphometries. [R package version 0.17] http://sourceforge.net/projects/morpho-rpackage/
46. Shannon C.E., 1949. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. Institute of Radio Engineers 37(1): 10-21.
47. Small C.G., 1996. The statistical theory of shape. Springer, New York.
48. th October, 1998.
49. Viscosi V., Cardini A., 2011. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometries: A simplified protocol for beginners. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25630. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0025630
50. Yezerinac S.M., Loogheed S.C., Handford P., 1992. Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Systematic Biology 41(4): 471-482.