Head/Tail Breaks: A New Classification Scheme for Data with a Heavy-Tailed Distribution

Professional Geographer

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 482-494

  Jiang, Bin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

data classification; head tail division rule; hierarchy; natural breaks; scaling

Indexed keywords

MINORITY GROUP; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84879184808     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2012.700499     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alexander, J. W. and Zahorchak, G. A. 1943. Population-density maps of the United States: Techniques and patterns. Geographical Review, 33 (3): 457-66.
2. Brewer, C. A. and Pickle, L. 2002. Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (4): 662-81.
3. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. and Newman, M. E. J. 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51: 661-703.
4. Coulson, M. R. C. 1987. In the matter of class intervals for choropleth maps: With particular reference to the work of George F Jenks. Cartographica, 24 (2): 16-39.
5. Evans, I. S. 1977. The selection of class intervals. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2 (1): 98-124.
6. Fisher, W. D. 1958. On grouping for maximum homogeneity. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53: 789-98.
7. Jenks, G. F. 1963. Generalization in statistical mapping. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53 (1): 15-26.
8. Jenks, G. F. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7: 186-90.
9. Jiang, B. 2009. Street hierarchies: A minority of streets account for a majority of traffic flow. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (8): 1033-48.
10. Jiang, B. 2010. Scaling of geographic space and its implications. Position paper presented at Las Navas 20th Anniversary Meeting on Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, Las Navas del Marques. Avila, Spain
11. Jiang, B. and Claramunt, C. 2004. Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31: 151-62.
12. Jiang, B. and Liu, X. 2012. Scaling of geographic space from the perspective of city and field blocks and using volunteered geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (2): 215-29.
13. Jiang, B., Zhao, S. and Yin, J. 2008. Self-organized natural roads for predicting traffic flow: A sensitivity study. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment: P07008
14. MacEachren, A. M. 1994. Some truth with maps: A primer on symbolization and design, Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
15. Miller, G. A. 1956. The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63 (2): 81-97.
16. Monmonier, M. 1996. How to lie with maps., 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. National Weather Service. 2011. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's national weather service. http://www.weather.gov/geodata/catalog/national/html/cities.htm (last accessed 15 February 2012).
18. Pumain, D. 2006. Hierarchy in natural and social sciences, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
19. Salingaros, N. A. and West, B. J. 1999. A universal rule for the distribution of sizes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26: 909-23.
20. Scripter, M. W. 1970. Nested-means map classes for statistical maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60 (2): 385-93.
21. Taleb, N. N. 2007. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable, London: Allen Lane.
22. Tobler, W. 1973. Choropleth maps without class intervals?. Geographical Analysis, 5: 262-65.
23. Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human behaviour and the principles of least effort, Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.