What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 684-700

  Hantsch, Ansgar ^a   Mädebach, Andreas ^b  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lexical access; Lexical competition; Picture naming; Picture word interference task; Response exclusion; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION;

EID: 84879180041     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.595725     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abdel Rahman, R. and Melinger, A. 2009. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 713 - 734.
2. Bloem, I. and La Heij, W. 2003. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 468 - 488.
3. Caramazza, A. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177 - 208.
4. Costa, A., Alario, F. X. and Caramazza, A. 2005. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 125 - 131.
5. Damian, M. F. and Martin, R. C. 1999. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 345 - 361.
6. Dell, G. S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93: 283 - 321.
7. Dhooge, E. and Hartsuiker, R. J. 2010. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36: 878 - 891.
8. Finkbeiner, M. and Caramazza, A. 2006a. Lexical selection is not a competitive process: A reply to La Heij et al. (2006). Cortex, 42: 1032 - 1035.
9. Finkbeiner, M. and Caramazza, A. 2006b. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a stroop-like task. Cortex, 42: 790 - 796.
10. Glaser, W. R. and Düngelhoff, F. J. 1984. The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 640 - 654.
11. Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D. and Schriefers, H. 2005. Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33: 984 - 1000.
12. Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D. and Schriefers, H. 2009. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: Implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35: 1443 - 1453.
13. Hartsuiker, R. J. and Kolk, H. H. J. 2001. Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42: 113 - 157.
14. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J. and Fias, W. 1995. Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21: 961 - 980.
15. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z. and Caramazza, A. 2008. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 249 - 256.
16. Jescheniak, J. D., Hantsch, A. and Schriefers, H. 2005. Context effects on lexical choice and lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31: 905 - 920.
17. Jescheniak, J. D. and Schriefers, H. 1998. Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 1256 - 1274.
18. Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H. and Hantsch, A. 2001. Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27: 1058 - 1078.
19. Kuipers, J.-R. and La Heij, W. 2008. Semantic facilitation in category and action naming: Testing the message-congruency account. Journal of Memory and Language, 58: 123
20. Kuipers, J.-R., La Heij, W. and Costa, A. 2006. A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21: 892 - 919.
21. La Heij, W. 1988. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16: 400 - 410.
22. La Heij, W., Dirkx, J. and Kramer, P. 1990. Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81: 511 - 525.
23. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22: 1 - 75.
25. Lupker, S. J. 1979. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7: 485 - 495.
26. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A. and Caramazza, A. 2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33: 503 - 535.
27. Miozzo, M. and Caramazza, A. 2003. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132: 228 - 252.
28. Roelofs, A. 1992. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42: 107 - 142.
29. Roelofs, A. 2006. Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59: 1764 - 1784.
30. Roelofs, A. 2008a. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137: 303 - 323.
31. Roelofs, A. 2008b. Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 353 - 368.
32. Rosinski, R. R. 1977. Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48: 643 - 647.
33. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1990. Exploring the time course of lexical access in production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 86 - 102.
34. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1996. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 896 - 918.
35. Underwood, G. 1976. Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67: 327 - 338.