Give me gestalt! preference for cubist artworks revealing high detectability of objects

Leonardo

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 488-489

  Muth, Claudia ^a   Pepperell, Robert ^b   Carbon, Claus Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879156645     PISSN: 0024094X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/LEON_a_00649     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S. Van de Cruys and J. Wagemans, "Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art, " I-Perception 2, No. 9 (2011) pp. 1035-1062.
2. Meinhardt (2009), , accessed December 2010.
3. D. Gamboni, Potential images: Ambiguity and indeterminacy in modern art (London: Reaktion Books, 2004).
4. R. Pepperell, "Connecting art and the brain. An artist's perspective on visual indeterminacy, " Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5 (2011) pp. 1-12.
5. M. Jakesch and H. Leder, "Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation, " The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, No. 11 (2009) pp. 2105-2112.
6. G. Dickie, Introduction to aesthetics: An analytic approach (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
7. P. Hekkert and H. Leder, "Product aesthetics", H. N. J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, eds., Product Experience (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007) p. 262.
8. R. Reber, N. Schwarz, and & P. Winkielman, "Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure. Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?, " Personality and Social Psychology Review 8, No. 4 (2004) pp. 364-382.
9. V. S. Ramachandran and W. Hirstein, "The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience, " Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, No. 6-7 (1999) pp. 15-51.
10. D. E. Berlyne, Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation (Oxford, U.K.: Hemisphere, 1974).
11. E. Gombrich, Art & Illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation (London: Phaidon, 1960).
12. R. Hughes, The shock of the new. Art and the century of change (London: Thames & Hudson, 1991) p. 32.
13. G. Apollinaire, Les peintres cubistes. Méditations Esthétiques (Paris: E. Figuière, 1913).
14. C. C. Carbon and H. Leder, "The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness, " Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, No. 5 (2005) pp. 587-601.
15. C. C. Carbon, L. Michael, and H. Leder, "Design evaluation by combination of repeated evaluation technique and measurement of electrodermal activity, " Research in Engineering Design 19, No. 2-3 (2008) pp. 143-149.
16. C. C. Carbon and J. P. L. Schoormans, "Rigidity rather than age as a limiting factor to appreciate innovative design, " Swiss Journal of Psychology 71, No. 2 (2012) pp. 51-58.
17. W. Köhler, Die Aufgabe der Gestaltpsychologie (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1971).
18. J. Richardson, A life of Picasso: 1907-1917: The painter of modern life (London: Jonathan Cape, 1996).
19. R. Penrose, "Picasso's Portrait of Kahnweiler, " The Burlington Magazine 116, No. 852 (1974) pp. 124-133.