-
1
-
-
84879184540
-
Special discussion issue on journal impact factors [Special issue]
-
Braun, T. (Ed.) (2012). Special discussion issue on journal impact factors [Special issue]. Scientometrics, 92(2).
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, Issue.2
-
-
Braun, T.1
-
2
-
-
33748653995
-
A Hirsch-type index for journals
-
Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69, 169-173.
-
(2006)
Scientometrics
, vol.69
, pp. 169-173
-
-
Braun, T.1
Glanzel, W.2
Schubert, A.3
-
3
-
-
0028839904
-
Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals
-
Brody, S. (1995). Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals. Lancet, 346(8985), 1300-1301.
-
(1995)
Lancet
, vol.346
, Issue.8985
, pp. 1300-1301
-
-
Brody, S.1
-
4
-
-
84864289665
-
Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the web of science and the journal citation reports databases: reflections on Vanclay's criticism
-
Jacso, P. (2012). Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the web of science and the journal citation reports databases: reflections on Vanclay's criticism. Scientometrics, 92, 325-354.
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, pp. 325-354
-
-
Jacso, P.1
-
5
-
-
0000876735
-
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
-
Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
-
(1977)
Cognitive Therapy and Research
, vol.1
, pp. 161-175
-
-
Mahoney, M.J.1
-
6
-
-
84864279253
-
Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way
-
Moed, H. F., Colledge, L., Reedijk, J., Felix Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Plume, A., et al. (2012). Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way. Scientometrics, 92, 367-376.
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, pp. 367-376
-
-
Moed, H.F.1
Colledge, L.2
Reedijk, J.3
Felix Moya-Anegon, F.4
Guerrero-Bote, V.5
Plume, A.6
-
7
-
-
84864290158
-
Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor
-
Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92, 395-401.
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, pp. 395-401
-
-
Pendlebury, D.A.1
Adams, J.2
-
8
-
-
84864288991
-
Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF. Comments on the paper by Jerome Vanclay
-
Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2012). Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF. Comments on the paper by Jerome Vanclay. Scientometrics, 92, 409-412.
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, pp. 409-412
-
-
Pudovkin, A.I.1
Garfield, E.2
-
9
-
-
77956307389
-
Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, eigenfactor, and article influence scores
-
Rizkallah, J., & Sin, D. D. (2010). Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, eigenfactor, and article influence scores. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10204.
-
(2010)
PLoS ONE
, vol.5
, Issue.4
-
-
Rizkallah, J.1
Sin, D.D.2
-
10
-
-
84863842264
-
Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
-
Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics, 92, 211-238.
-
(2012)
Scientometrics
, vol.92
, pp. 211-238
-
-
Vanclay, J.K.1
|