Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 947-952

  Palacín Marín, Fuensanta ^a   Esteban Moreno, Bernabé ^a   Olea, Nicolas ^a   Herrera Viedma, Enrique ^a   Arroyo Morales, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Assessment; Internet; Low back pain; Telerehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR STRAIGHT LEG RAISE TEST; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EXERCISE TEST; FACE TO FACE METHOD; FACILITATED COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTERVIEW; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MOTOR CONTROL; MUSCLE EXERCISE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION; SHORT FORM 12; SORENSEN TEST; SPINE MOBILITY; TAMPA KINESIOPHOBIA SCALE; TELEREHABILITATION; TELETHERAPY; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; KINESIOLOGY, APPLIED; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL ENDURANCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REMOTE CONSULTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84879096798     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine 2006; 31: 2724-7.
2. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, et al. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine 2010; 35: 1714-20.
3. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults. Health provider utilization and care seeking. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 327-35.
4. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA 2008; 299: 656-64.
5. Theodoros D, Rusell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. In: LatifiR, ed. Current Principles and Practices of Telemedicine and e-Health. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Publ Co; 2006; 191-210.
6. Russell TG, Buttrum P, Woottton R, et al. Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 113-20.
7. van der Roer N, van Tulder M, van Mechelen W, et al. Economic evaluation of an intensive group training protocol compared with usual care physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2008; 33: 445-51.
8. Russell TG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 217-20.
9. Karayannis NV, Jull GA, Hodges PW. Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey. BMC Musculoeskelet Disord 2012; 13: 24.
10. Cabana F. Interrater agreement between telerehabilitation and faceto- face clinical outcome measurements for total knee arthroplasty. Telemed e-Health 2010; 16: 293-8.
11. Palsbo SE, Dawson SJ, Savard L, et al. Televideo assessment using functional Rach test and European stroke scale. J Rehabil Res 2007; 44: 659-64.
12. Russell TG, Blumke R, Richardson B, et al. Telerehabilitation mediated physiotherapy assessment of ankle disorders. Physiother Res Int 2010; 15: 167-75.
13. Waddell G, Richardson J. Observation of overt pain behaviour by physicians during routine clinical examination of patients with low back pain. J Psychosom Res 1992; 36: 77-87.
14. Good DW, Lui DF, Leonard M, et al. Skype: a tool for functional assessment in orthopaedic research. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 94-8.
15. Botton F, Hautier C, Eclache JP. Energy expenditure during tennis play: a preliminary video analysis and metabolic model approach. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 3022-8.
16. Fernandes-Candido PE, Schmidt-Teixeira JV, Pereira-Moro AR, et al. Biomechanical strain of goldsmiths. Work 2012; 31: 2506-9.
17. Puentedura EJ, Huijbregts PA, Celeste S, et al. Immediate effects of quantified hamstring stretching: hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation versus static stretching. Phys Ther Sport 2011; 12: 122-6.
18. Bottle E, Strutton PH. Relationship between back muscle endurance and voluntary activation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2012, 22: 383-90.
19. Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the active straight leg raise test as diagnostic instrument in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine 2001, 26: 1167-71.
20. Roussel NA, Nijs J, Truijen S, et al. Low back pain: clinimetric properties of the Trendelenburg test, active straight leg raise test, and breathing pattern during active straight leg raising. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007, 30: 270-8.
21. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940-52.
22. Bijur P, Silveer W, Gallagher JE. Reliability of the visual analogue scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 1153-7.
23. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. Int Qual Life Assess J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1171-8.
24. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, et al. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain 2005; 117: 137-44.
25. Bland J, Altman D. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-60.
26. Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, et al. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47: 289-94.
27. Shin SH, Ro DH, Lee OS, et al. Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Man Ther 2012; 17: 298-304.
28. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD. Reliability of Internet- versus telephone-administered questionnaires in a diverse sample of smokers. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e8.
29. Amick MM, Miller IN, Neargarder S, et al. Web-based assessment of visual and visuospatial symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis 2012. Article 564812.
30. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH. Web-based assessment of depression in patients treated in clinical practice: reliability, validity, and patient acceptance. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73: 333-8.
31. Ditmyer MM, Topp R, Pifer M. Prehabilitation in preparation for orthopaedic surgery. Orthop Nurs 2002; 21: 43-51.
32. Hafner T, Shiffman J. The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening [published online ahead of print March 8, 2012]. Health Policy Plan 2012. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs023.
33. Russell TG, Buttrum P, Wootton R, et al. Rehabilitation after total knee replacement via low-bandwidth telemedicine: the patient and therapist experience. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10: 85-7.
34. Psalbo SE. Medicaid payment for telerehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1188-91.
35. Maheu MM, Whitten P, Allen A. e-Health, Telehealth and Telemedicine: A Guide to Start-up and Success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002
36. Hoffmann T, Russell T, Thompson L, et al. Using the Internet to assess activities of daily living and hand function in people with Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabilitation 2008; 23: 253-61.