Exploring metric sensitivity of planners for generation of pareto frontiers

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 241, Issue , 2012, Pages 306-317

  Sroka, Michal ^a   Long, Derek ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

metric sensitivity; multiple objectives; Planning; solution set

Indexed keywords

PARETO PRINCIPLE;

'CURRENT; DIVERSE PLANS; EXPOSED TO; GENERATING SET; METRIC SENSITIVITY; MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVES; OPTIMAL PLAN; PARETO FRONTIERS; PARETO-OPTIMAL; SOLUTIONS SETS;

PLANNING;

EID: 84879089124     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-096-3-306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Amanda Coles, Andrew Coles, Maria Fox, and Derek Long, Forward-Chaining Partial-Order Planning, AAAI 20 (2010).
2. Andrew Coles, Maria Fox, Derek Long, and Amanda Smith, A Hybrid Relaxed Planning GraphA?SLP Heuristic for Numeric Planning Domains, ICAPS (2008).
3. Das and Dennis, A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems., 1997.
4. M. Fox and D. Long, PDDL2.1 : An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20 (2003), 61-124.
5. A Gerevini and I Serina, LPG: A planner based on local search for planning graphs with action costs, Proc. of AIPS-02 1 (2002), 1.
6. A.E. Gerevini, P. Haslum, D. Long, A. Saetti, and Y. Dimopoulos, Deterministic Planning in the Fifth International Planning Competition: PDDL3 and Experimental Evaluation of the Planners, Artifficial Intelligence 173 (2009), 1-63.
7. Mark E. Giuliano, Reiko Rager, and Nazma Ferdous, Towards a Heuristic for Scheduling the James Webb Space Telescope, ICAPS (2007).
8. J. Hoffmann, The Metric-FF Planning System: Translating Ignoring Delete Lists to Numeric State Variables, Journal of Artifcial Intelligence Research 20 (2003), 291-341.
9. J. Hoffmann and B. Nebel, The FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation Through Heuristic Search, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14 (2001), 253-302.
10. C.L. Hwang, S. R.Paidy, and K. Yoon, Mathematical programing with multiple objectives: a tutorial.
11. Mark D. Johnston and Mark Giuliano, Multi-Objective Scheduling for the Cluster II Constellation, (2011).
12. R.T. Marler and J.S.Arora., Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering, 2004.
13. Achille Messac, Surendra M. Gupta, and Burak Akbulut, Linear Physical Programming: A New Approach to Multiple Objective Optimization, 1996.
14. A. Messsac and C.A.Mattson, Generating Well-Distributed Sets of Pareto Points for engineering Design Using Physical Programming., 2001.
15. T. Nguyen, M. Do, A. Gerevini, I. Serina, B. Srivastava, and S.Kambahampati, Planning with Partial preference Models, TechnicalReport (2011).
16. Tuan A. Nguyen, Minh B. Do, Subbarao Kambhampati, and Biplav Srivastava, Planning with Partial preference Models, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI 1 (2009), 1.
17. S.Zionts and J. Wallenius, An Interactive Programming Method for solving the Multiple Criteria Problem, 1975.
18. S.V. Utyuzhnikov, P. Fantini, and M.D. Guenov., A method for generating a well distributed Pareto set in nonlinear multiobjective optimization, 2007.