Path-Dependent UK Bioenergy

Science as Culture

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 213-221

  Levidow, Les ^a   Papaioannou, Theo ^a   Borda Rodriguez, Alexander ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

innovation; lock in; path creation; path dependence; sustainable bioenergy; UK

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879062949     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2013.786993     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abramsky, K. 2010. " Sparking an energy revolution: Building new relations of production, exchange and livelihood ". In Sparking a Worldwide Energy Revolution: Social Struggles in the Transition to a Post-Petrol World, Edited by: Abramsky. 628 - 656. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
2. Bergman, N. and Eyre, N. 2011. What role for microgeneration in a shift to a low carbon domestic energy sector in the UK?. Energy Efficiency, 4 (3): 335 - 353.
3. DECC. 2009. The UK Renewable Energy Strategy, London: HMSO/Department of Energy and Climate Change.
4. DECC-DfT-DEFRA. 2012. UK Bioenergy Strategy, London: Department of Energy and Climate Change, Department for Transport, Department of the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs.
5. Edgerton, D. 2006. Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900: Technology in Global History since 1900, London: Profile.
6. Faaij, A. P. C. 2006. Bio-energy in Europe: Changing technology choices. Energy Policy, 34 (3): 322 - 342.
7. HMG. 2011. UK Renewable Energy Roadmap, London: Her Majesty's Government.
8. Hudson, L., Winskel, M. and Allen, S. 2011. The hesitant emergence of low carbon technologies in the UK: The micro-CHP innovation system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23 (3): 297 - 312.
9. Kemp, R. and Rotmans, J. 2005. " The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems ". In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Edited by: Weber, M. and Hemmelskemp, J. 33 - 55. Berlin: Springer.
10. LCICG. 2012. Technology Innovation Needs Assessment (TINA): Bioenergy Summary Report, London: Low Carbon Innovation Co-ordination Group (LCICG), DECC.
11. Levidow, L. and Papaioannou, T. 2012. State imaginaries of the public good: Shaping UK innovation priorities for bioenergy. Environmental Science and Policy, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.008 (accessed 18 April 2013)
12. Lovio, R., Mickwitz, P. and Heiskanen, E. 2011. " Path dependence, path creation and creative destruction in the evolution of energy systems ". In The Handbook of Research on Energy Entrepreneurship, Edited by: Wüstenhagen, R. and Wuebker, R. 274 - 301. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13. Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42 (4): 323 - 340.
14. Meek, J. 2012. How we happened to sell off our electricity. London Review of Books, 34 (17): 3 - 12.
15. Patterson, W. (2006) Energy policy is infrastructure policy, in: Conference on 'Unlocking the Power House', October 9, London, Royal Academy of Engineering.
16. POST (2012) Energy Use Behaviour Change, POSTnote 417 (London: Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology).
17. Russell, S. 1993. Writing energy history: Explaining the neglect of CHP/DH in Britain. British Journal for the History of Science, 26 (1): 33 - 54.
18. Russell, S. 2010. CHP and DH to the mid-1990s, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, ISSTI.
19. Shackley, S. and Green, K. 2007. A conceptual framework for exploring transitions to decarbonised energy systems in the United Kingdom. Energy, 32 (3): 221 - 236.
20. Star, S. L. (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), pp. 377-391.
21. Thornley, P., Upham, P. and Tomei, J. 2009. Sustainability constraints on UK bioenergy development. Energy Policy, 37 (12): 5623 - 5635.
22. van der Vleuten, E. and Raven, R. 2006. Lock-in and change: Distributed generation in Denmark in a long-term perspective. Energy Policy, 34 (18): 3739 - 3748.