Embryonic exposure to predator odour modulates visual lateralization in cuttlefish

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1752, 2013, Pages

  Jozet Alves, Christelle ^a,b   Hébert, Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Cephalopods; Invertebrate; Predation pressure; Sepia; Visual lateralization

Indexed keywords

CEPHALOPOD; HATCHING; HERITABILITY; MORPHOLOGY; ODOR; OLFACTORY CUE;

CEPHALOPODA; INVERTEBRATA; SEPIA; SEPIIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84879059642     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2575     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gottlieb G. 1998 Normally occurring environmental and behavioural influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesist. Psychol. Rev. 105, 792-802. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4. 792-802)
2. Gottlieb G. 2000 Environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 9, 93-97. (doi:10.1111/1467-8721. 00068)
3. Rogers L. 2010 Interactive contributions of genes and early experience to behavioural development, sensitive periods and lateralized brain and behaviour. In Handbook of developmental science, behaviour, and genetics (eds K Hood, C Tucker Halpern, G Greenberg, R Lerner), pp. 400-433. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G, Rogers L. 2012 Left-right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1273-1291. (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.006)
5. Rogers L. 2007 Lateralization in its many forms, and its evolution and development. In The evolution of hemispheric specialization in primates, special topics in primatology, vol. 5 (ed. WD Hopkins), pp. 22-56. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
6. Vallortigara G, Chiandetti C, Sovrano V. 2010 Brain asymmetry (animal). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2, 146-157. (doi:10.1002/wcs.100)
7. Magat M, Brown C. 2009 Laterality enhances cognition in Australian parrots. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 4155-4162. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1397)
8. Pascual A, Huang K, Neveu J, Préat T. 2004 Brain asymmetry and long-term memory. Nature 427, 605-606. (doi:10.1038/427605a)
9. Rogers L, Zucca P, Vallortigara G. 2004 Advantages of having a lateralized brain. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S420-S422. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0200)
10. Brown C, Gardner C, Braithwaite V. 2004 Population variation in lateralized eye use in the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S455-S457. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0222)
11. Brown C, Western J, Braithwaite V. 2007 The influence of early experience on, and inheritance of cerebral lateralization. Anim. Behav. 74, 231-238. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.08.014)
12. Bisazza A, Sovrano V, Vallortigara G. 2001 Consistency among different tasks of left-right asymmetries in lines of fish originally selected for opposite direction of lateralization in a detour task. Neuropsychologia 39, 1077-1085. (doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00034-3)
13. Bisazza A, Facchin L, Vallortigara G. 2000 Heritability of lateralization in fish: concordance of right-left asymmetry between parents and offspring. Neuropsychologia 38, 907-912. (doi:10. 1016/S0028-3932(00)00018-X)
14. Vallortigara G, Rogers L. 2005 Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 575-633. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X05470107)
15. Rogers L, Sink H. 1988 Transient asymmetry in the projections of the rostral thalamus to the visual hyperstriatum of the chicken, and reversal of its direction by light exposure. Exp. Brain Res. 70, 378-384. (doi:10.1007/BF00248362)
16. Skiba M, Diekamp B, Güntürün O. 2002 Embryonic light stimulation induces different asymmetries in visuoperceptual and visuomotor pathways of pigeons. Behav. Brain Res. 134, 149-156. (doi:10. 1016/S0166-4328(01)00463-6)
17. Güntürün O. 2005 How asymmetry in animals starts. Eur. Rev. 13, 105-118. (doi:10.1017/S1062798705000694)
18. Andrew R, Osorio D, Budaev S. 2009 Light during embryonic development modulates patterns of lateralization strongly and similarly in both zebrafish and chick. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 983-989. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0241)
19. Rogers L, Bolden S. 1991 Light-dependent development and asymmetry of visual projections. Neurosci. Lett. 121, 63-67. (doi:10.1016/0304-3940(91)90650-I)
20. Andrew R, Dharmaretnam M, Györi B, Mikosi A, Watkins J, Sovrano V. 2009 Precise endogenous control of involvement of right and left visual structures in assessment by zebrafish. Behav. Brain Res. 196, 99-105. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.07.034)
21. Jozet-Alves C, Viblanc V, Romagny S, Dacher M, Healy S, Dickel L. 2012 Ontogenetic study of sideturning preference in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). Anim. Behav. 83, 1313-1318. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2012.02.023)
22. Jozet-Alves C, Romagny S, Bellanger C, Dickel L. 2012 Cerebral correlates of visual lateralization in Sepia. Behav. Brain Res. 234, 20-25. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.05.042)
23. Ghirlanda S, Frasnelli E, Vallortigara G. 2009 Intraspecific competition and coordination in the evolution of lateralization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 861-866. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0227)
24. Ghirlanda S, Vallortigara G. 2004 The evolution of brain lateralization: a game-theoretical analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271, 853-857. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2669)
25. Richard A. 1971 Contribution al'étude expérimentale de la croissance et de la maturation sexuelle de Sepia officinalis L. (Mollusque, Céphalopode). These de doctorat d'état, Université de Lille, France.
26. Dickel L, Boal JG, Budelmann B. 2000 The effect of early experience on learning and memory in cuttlefish. Dev. Psychobiol. 36, 101-110. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200003)36)
27. Poirier R, Chichery R, Dickel L. 2004 Effects of rearing conditions on sand digging efficiency in juvenile cuttlefish. Behav. Proc. 67, 273-279. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.04.006)
28. Ferrari M, Messier F, Chivers D. 2008 Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: risk assessment by larval woodfrogs. Chemoecology 17, 263-266. (doi:10.1007/s00049-007-0381-0)
29. Bisazza A, Pignatti R, Vallortigara G. 1997 Detour tests reveal task-and stimulus-specific behavioural lateralization in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Behav. Brain Res. 89, 237-242. (doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00061-2)
30. Holm S. 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65-70. (doi:10.2307/4615733)
31. Goth A. 2001 Innate predator-recognition in Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami, Megapodiidae) hatchlings. Behaviour 138, 117- 136. (doi:10.1163/156853901750077826)
32. Kiesecker J, Blaustein A. 1997 Population differences in responses of red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) to introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 78, 1752-1760. (doi:10. 1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1752:PDIROR]2.0.CO)
33. Berejikian B, Tezak E, LaRae A. 2003 Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon. Environ. Biol. Fishes 67, 241-251. (doi:10.1023/A:1025887015436)
34. Lukowiak K, Martens K, Rosenegger D, Browning K, de Caigny P, Orr M. 2008 The perception of stress alters adaptive behaviours in Lymnaea stagnalis. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1747-1756. (doi:10.1242/jeb.014886)
35. Alves C, Chichery R, Boal J, Dickel L. 2007 Orientation in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis: response versus place strategy. Anim. Cogn. 10, 29-36. (doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0027-6)
36. Bisazza A, Facchin L, Pignatti R, Vallortigara G. 1998 Lateralization of detour behaviour in poeciliid fish: the effect of species, gender and sexual motivation. Behav. Brain Res. 91, 157-164. (doi:10.1016/ S0166-4328(97)00114-9)
37. Sovrano V, Rainoldi C, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G. 1999 Roots of brain specializations: preferential lefteye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish. Behav. Brain Res. 106, 175-180. (doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00105-9)
38. Mathis A, Ferrari M, Windel N, Messier F, Chivers D. 2008 Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2603-2607. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0754)
39. Dadda M, Bisazza A. 2006 Does brain asymmetry allow efficient performance of simultaneous tasks? Anim. Behav. 72, 523-529. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.019)
40. Chivers D, Zhao X, Brown G, Marchant T, Ferrari M. 2008 Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk. Evol. Ecol. 22, 561-574. (doi:10.1007/s10682-007-9182-8)
41. Corballis M. 2009 The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 867-879. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0232)