FS200 femtosecond laser LASIK flap digital analysis parameter evaluation: Comparing two different types of patient interface applanation cones

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages 1103-1108

  Kanellopoulos, A John ^a,b   Asimellis, George ^a  

^a Laservisiongr Institute   (Greece)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcon wavelight FS200; Applanation cone; Bladeless LASIK; Clear cone; Corneal flap diameter; Femtosecond laser precision; Flap thickness; Hyperopic laser correction; Myopic laser correction; Patient interface

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMTOSECOND LASER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAFETY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 84879039931     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S43396     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, Krueger RR. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003;19 (2):94-103.
2. Nordan LT, Slade SG, Baker RN, Suarez C, Juhasz T, Kurtz R. Femtosecond laser flap creation for laser in situ keratomileusis: six-month follow-up of initial US clinical series. J Refract Surg. 2003; 19 (1):8-14.
3. Strohmaier C, Runge C, Seyeddain O, et al. Profiles of intraocular pressure in human donor eyes during femtosecond laser procedures: a comparative study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;17;54(1):522-528.
4. Vetter JM, Holzer MP, Teping C, et al. Intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation: comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27 (6):427-433.
5. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Digital analysis in flap parameter accuracy and opaque bubble layer objective assessment in femtosecond laser assisted LASIK. A novel technique. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7: 343-351.
6. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Three dimensional LASIK flap thickness variability: Topographic central, paracentral and peripheral assessment, in flaps created by a mechanical microkeratome (M2) and 2 different femtosecond lasers (FS60 and FS200). Clin Ophthalmol. 2013. In press.
7. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Long term bladeless LASIK outcomes with the FS200 femtosecond and EX500 excimer laser workstation: the Refractive Suite. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:261-269.
8. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. High myopia one-year refractive and keratometric stability in LASIK with high-frequency femtosecond and excimer lasers. J Refract Surg. 2013. In press.
9. Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal flap cuts: morphology, accuracy, and histopathology invest. Ophth Vis Sci. 2006;47 (7):2828-2831.
10. Khoramnia R, Salgado JP, Lohmann CP, Kobuch KA, Winkler von Mohrenfels C. Precision, morphology, and histology of corneal flap cuts using a 200-kHz femtosecond laser. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;22 (2):161-167.
11. Mrochen M, Wüllner C, Krause J, Klafke M, Donitzky C, Seiler T. Technical aspects of the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2010;26 (10):S833-S840.