Regulatory Rationales Beyond the Economic: In Search of the Public Interest

The Oxford Handbook of Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Feintuck, Mike ^a  

^a University of Hull   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Market driven decision making; Practices; Regulation; Social justice; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879031914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560219.003.0003     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Ackerman, F. & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless, New York: The New Press.
2. Arblaster, A. (2002). Democracy (3rd edn.), Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Bagdikian, B. (2004). The Media Monopoly, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
4. Baldwin, R. & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Baldwin, R. & Cave, M. Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). 'Introduction', in R. Baldwin, C. Scott, and C. Hood (eds.), Reader on Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bell, J. (1993). 'Public Interest: Policy or Principle?' in R. Brownsword (ed.), Law and the Public Interest (Proceedings of the 1992 ALSP Conference), Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
7. Breyer, S. G. (1982). Regulation and its Reform, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Coyle, S. & Morrow, K. (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of Environmental Law: Property, Rights and Nature, Oxford: Hart.
9. Craig, P. P. (1990). Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, Oxford: Clarendon.
10. da Cruz Vilaça, J. (2004). 'The Precautionary Principle in EC Law', European Public Law, 10(2): 369.
11. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2004). Enterprise Act 2002: Public Interest Intervention in Media Mergers, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
12. Feintuck, M. (1999). Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
13. Feintuck, M. (2004). The 'Public Interest' in Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Feintuck, M. (2005). 'Precautionary Maybe, But What's the Principle?', Journal of Law and Society, 32(3): 371-98.
15. Feintuck, M. & Varney, M. (2007). Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law, (2nd edn.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
16. Fisher, E. (2003). 'Precaution, Precaution Everywhere: Developing a "Common Understanding" of the Precautionary Principle in the European Community', Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 9-10: 7.
17. Gamble, A. & Kelly, G. (1996). 'The New Politics of Ownership', New Left Review, 220: 62.
18. Goodie, J. & Wickham, G. (2002). 'Calculating "Public Interest": Common Law and the Legal Governance of the Environment', Social and Legal Studies, 11: 37.
19. Graham, C. (2000). Regulating Public Utilities: A Constitutional Approach, Oxford: Hart.
20. Harden, I. & Lewis, N. (1986). The Noble Lie: The British Constitution and the Rule of Law, London: Hutchinson.
21. Harremoes, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B., & Guedes Vaz, S. (2002). The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
22. Herman, E. & McChesney, R. (1997). The Global Media, London: Cassell.
23. Hession, M. & Macrory, R. (1994). 'Maastricht and the Environmental Policy of the Community: Legal Issues of a New Environment Policy', in D. O'Keefe and P. Twomey, Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, London: Wiley.
24. Honohan, I. (2002). Civic Republicanism, London: Routledge.
25. Katz, A. V. (ed.) (1998). Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Kelman, M. (1998). 'Legal Economists and Normative Social Theory', in A. W. Katz (ed.), Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Krasnow, E. and Goodman, J. (1998). 'The Public Interest Standard: The Search for the Holy Grail', Federal Communications Law Journal, 50: 605.
28. Le Grand, J. (1991). 'Quasi-Markets and Social Policy', Economic Journal, 101: 1256.
29. Leff, A. A. (1998). 'Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism About Nominalism' in A. W. Katz (ed.), Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Leys, C. (2001). Market-Driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest, London: Verso.
31. Lucy, W.& Mitchell, C. (1996). 'Replacing Private Property: The Case for Stewardship', Cambridge Law Journal, 55(3): 566.
32. Majone, G. (ed.) (1996). Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.
33. Marquand, D. (2004). Decline of the Public, London: Polity Press.
34. Marshall, T. (1964). Class, Citizenship and Social Development, New York: Doubleday.
35. May, R. (2001). 'The Public Interest Standard: Is it too Indeterminate to be Constitutional?' Federal Communications Law Journal, 53: 427.
36. Milne, A. J. M. (1993). 'The Public Interest, Political Controversy, and the Judges', in R. Brownsword (ed.), Law and the Public Interest (Proceedings of the 1992 ALSP Conference), Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
37. Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing and Removing Regulatory Forms, New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Morgan, B. & Yeung, K. (2007). An Introduction to Law and Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Morris, J. (ed.) (2000). Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
40. Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. O'Riordan, T. & Cameron, J. (eds.) (1994). Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Earthscan.
42. Prosser, T. (1997). Law and the Regulators, Oxford: Clarendon.
43. Prosser, T. (2005). The Limits of Competition Law: Markets and Public Services, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Rabin, R. (1990). 'The Administrative State and its Excesses: Reflections on The New Property', University of San Francisco Law Review, 25: 273; extracts reproduced in Schuck, Foundations of Administrative Law, 123.
45. Robertson, M. (1999). 'Liberal, Democratic, and Socialist Approaches to the Public Dimensions of Private Property', in J. McLean (ed.), Property and the Constitution, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
46. Sagoff, M. (2004). Price, Principle, and the Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Salmon, N. (2002). 'A European Perspective on the Precautionary Principle, Food Safety and the Free Trade Imperative of the WTO', European Law Review, 27: 138.
48. Schuck, P. H. (ed.) (1994). Foundations of Administrative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Seabright, P. & von Hagen, J. (2007). The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Select Committee on Communications (Lords) (2008). The Ownership of the News, HL Paper 122-1, London: The Stationery Office.
51. Stewart, P. & Gibson, D. (2003). 'The Communications Act: A New Era', Communications Law, 8/5: 357.
52. Sunstein, C. R. (1990). After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Sunstein, C. R. (1997). Free Markets and Social Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.