Evaluation of a 3M Petrifilm on-farm culture system for the detection of intramammary infection at the end of lactation

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 111, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 1-9

  Cameron, M ^a   Keefe, G P ^a   Roy, J P ^b   Dohoo, I R ^a   MacDonald, K A ^a   McKenna, S L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Intramammary infection; On farm culture; Petrifilm; Selective dry cow therapy; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BOVINE MASTITIS; CANADA; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CYTOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; LACTATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UDDER;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; CELL COUNT; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; FEMALE; LACTATION; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK; PREVALENCE; PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND; QUEBEC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84879026031     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Berry E.A., Hillerton J.E. The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:2512-2520.
2. Berry E.A., Hillerton J.E. The effect of selective dry cow treatment on new intramammary infections. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:112-121.
3. Berry S.L., Maas J., Kirk J.H., Reynolds J.P., Gardner I.A., Ahmadi A. Effects of antimicrobial treatment at the end of lactation on milk yield, somatic cell count, and incidence of clinical mastitis during the subsequent lactation in a dairy herd with a low prevalence of contagious mastitis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1997, 211:207-211.
4. Bradley A.J., Green M.J. The importance of the nonlactating period in the epidemiology of intramammary infection and strategies for prevention. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2004, 20:547-568.
5. Dohoo I.R., Smith J., Andersen S., Kelton D.F., Godden S. Mastitis Research Workers' Conference, 2011. Diagnosing intramammary infections: evaluation of definitions based on a single milk sample. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:250-261.
6. Dohoo I.R., Martin S.W., Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research 2009, VER, Inc, Charlottetown, P.E.I., Canada. 2nd ed.
7. Dufour S., Dohoo I.R., Barkema H.W., DesCÔteaux L., DeVries T.J., Reyher K.K., Roy J.P., Scholl D.T. Manageable risk factors associated with the lactational incidence, elimination, and prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:1283-1300.
8. Erskine R.J., Wagner S., DeGraves F.J. Mastitis therapy and pharmacology. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2003, 19:109-138. vi.
9. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry #209: The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-producing Animals (Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0094) 2012, Retrieved from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Website: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM216936.pdf (accessed 19.12.12).
10. Gambrel-Lenarz S., Lindberg K. 3M Petrifilm Plate Reader for the Enumeration of Petrifilm Aerobic, Coliform, E. coli/coliform Count Plates 2004, Retrieved from: www.3m.com/intl/kr/microbiology/pprdata/4.pdf (accessed 19.12.12).
11. Halasa T., Huijps K., Osteras O., Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Vet. Q. 2007, 29:18-31.
12. Huxley J.N., Green M.J., Green L.E., Bradley A.J. Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:551-561.
13. Lago A., Godden S.M., Bey R., Ruegg P.L., Leslie K. The selective treatment of clinical mastitis based on on-farm culture results: I. Effects on antibiotic use, milk withholding time, and short-term clinical and bacteriological outcomes. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:4441-4456.
14. MacDonald K.A., Keefe G.P., Roy J.P., Poole D., Muckle A. Accuracy of on-farm diagnosis of clinical mastitis using 3M Petrifilm compared to standard microbiology. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality 2011, 59-63.
15. McCarron, J.L., 2012. Evaluation of the University of Minnesota Easy Culture System II and the 3M Petrifilm for diagnosis of mastitis causing organisms. Master's Thesis. University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
16. McCarron J.L., Keefe G.P., McKenna S.L., Dohoo I.R., Poole D.E. Laboratory evaluation of 3M Petrifilms and University of Minnesota bi-plates as potential on-farm tests for clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:2297-2305.
17. Murdough P.A., Deitz K.E., Pankey J.W. Effects of freezing on the viability of nine pathogens from quarters with subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79:334-336.
18. National Mastitis Council Laboratory and Field Handbook on Bovine Mastitis 1987, National Mastitis Council Inc., Arlington, VA.
19. National Mastitis Council Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Revised Edition 1999, National Mastitis Council Inc., Madison, WI.
20. National Mastitis Council Recommended Mastitis Control Plan 2006, Retrieved from the National Mastitis Council website: http://www.nmconline.org/docs/NMCchecklistInt.pdf (accessed 19.12.12).
21. Neave F.K., Dodd F.H., Kingwill R.G., Westgarth D.R. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J. Dairy Sci. 1969, 52:696-707.
22. Pyörälä S., Taponen S. Coagulase-negative staphylococci-emerging mastitis pathogens. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 134:3-8.
23. Reyher K.K., Dohoo I.R. Diagnosing intramammary infections: evaluation of composite milk samples to detect intramammary infections. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:3387-3396.
24. Reyher K.K., Dufour S., Barkema H.W., Des Coteaux L., Devries T.J., Dohoo I.R., Keefe G.P., Roy J.P., Scholl D.T. The National Cohort of Dairy Farm-a data collection platform for mastitis research in Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:1616-1626.
25. Reyher K.K., Haine D., Dohoo I.R., Revie C.W. Examining the effect of intramammary infections with minor mastitis pathogens on the acquisition of new intramammary infections with major mastitis pathogens-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:6483-6502.
26. Rindsig R.B., Rodewald R.G., Smith A.R., Spahr S.L. Complete versus selective dry cow therapy for mastitis control. J. Dairy Sci. 1978, 61:1483-1497.
27. Rindsig R.B., Rodewald R.G., Smith A.R., Thomsen N.K., Spahr S.L. Mastitis history, California mastitis test, and somatic cell counts for identifying cows for treatment in a selective dry cow therapy program. J. Dairy Sci. 1979, 62:1335-1339.
28. Saini V., McClure J.T., Léger D., Dufour S., Sheldon A.G., Scholl D.T., Barkema H.W. Antimicrobial use on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:1209-1221.
29. Sanford C.J., Keefe G.P., Dohoo I.R., Leslie K.E., Dingwell R.T., DesCoteaux L., Barkema H.W. Efficacy of using an internal teat sealer to prevent new intramammary infections in nonlactating dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006, 228:1565-1573.
30. Sanford C.J., Keefe G.P., Sanchez J., Dingwell R.T., Barkema H.W., Leslie K.E., Dohoo I.R. Test characteristics from latent-class models of the California mastitis test. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 77:96-108.
31. Schukken Y.H., Grommers F.J., Smit J.A., Vandegeer D., Brand A. Effect of freezing on bacteriologic culturing of mastitis milk samples. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72:1900-1906.
32. SDA Animal Drug Authority of the Netherlands 2012, (accessed 19.12.12). http://www.autoriteitdiergeneesmiddelen.nl/rundveehouders.
33. Supré K., Haesebrouck F., Zadoks R.N., Vaneechoutte M., Piepers S., De Vliegher S. Some coagulase-negative staphylococcus species affect udder health more than others. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:2329-2340.
34. Thomson K., Rantala M., Hautala M., Pyorala S., Kaartinen L. Cross-sectional prospective survey to study indication-based usage of antimicrobials in animals: results of use in cattle. BMC Vet. Res. 2008, 4:15.
35. Torres A.H., Rajala-Schultz P.J., Degraves F.J., Hoblet K.H. Using dairy herd improvement records and clinical mastitis history to identify subclinical mastitis infections at dry-off. J. Dairy Res. 2008, 75:240-247.
36. U.S.Department of Agriculture (USDA) Dairy 2007. Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007 2008, USDA-APHIS-VS, CEAH, National Animal Health Monitoring System, Fort Collins, CO, (#N482.0908).
37. Wallace J.A., Bouchard E., DesCoteaux L., Messier S., DuTremblay D., Roy J.P. Comparison of results for commercially available microbiological media plates with results for standard bacteriologic testing of bovine milk. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2011, 72:1622-1630.
38. White D.G., McDermott P.F. Emergence and transfer of antibacterial resistance. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84(Suppl.):E151-E155.
39. Woolford M.W., Williamson J.H., Day A.M., Copeman P.J. The prophylactic effect of a teat sealer on bovine mastitis during the dry period and the following lactation. N. Z. Vet. J. 1998, 46:12-19.