Stormwater management and urban planning: Lessons from 40 years of innovation

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 786-801

  Cettner, Annicka ^a   Ashley, Richard ^a   Viklander, Maria ^a   Nilsson, Kristina ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

barriers and opportunities; interviews; planning approaches; planning practice; urban stormwater planning

Indexed keywords

PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; PIPELINE; PLANNING PRACTICE; SEWER NETWORK; STORMWATER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84878984339     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.706216     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ashley, R. 2011. Surface water management and urban green infrastructure: a review of potential benefits and UK and international practices [online] Available from: http://www.fwr.org [Accessed 10 November 2011]
2. Barrett, P. and Sutrisna, M. 2009. Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies. Construction management and economics, 27 (10): 935 - 948.
3. Berke, P. R. 2002. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of planning literature, 17 (1): 21 - 36.
4. Berner, B. 2004. Ifrågasättanden. Forskning om genus, teknik och naturvetenskap, Linköpings Universitet. (online) Available from: www.tema.liu.se (Accessed 7 September 2012)
5. Boverket. 2004. Vattendirektivet och fysisk planering. Hur kommer den nya vattenplaneringen att påverka den fysiska planeringen enligt plan- och bygglagen (online) Available from: www.boverket.se (Accessed 7 September 2012)
6. Boverket. 2010. Kommunal planering [online]. Available from: www.boverket.se (Accessed 7 September 2012)
7. Brown, R. and Farrelly, M. Sustainable urban stormwater management in Australia: professional perceptions on institutional drivers and barriers. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on urban drainage. Edinburgh, Scotland. 31 August-5 September. (online) Available from: http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/staffprofiles/bdgsa/11th_International_Conference_on_Urban_Drainage_CD/ICUD08/pdfs/615.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2012)
8. Brown, R. R. and Farrelly, M. A. 2009a. Challenges ahead: social and institutional factors influencing sustainable urban stormwater management in Australia. Water science and technology, 59 (4): 653 - 660.
9. Brown, R. R. and Farrelly, M. A. 2009b. Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. Water science and technology, 59 (5): 839 - 846.
10. Bullivant, L. 2010. Kartlägger världens planering. Arkitekten, Sveriges arkitekters bransch- och medlemsmagasin, 03, March 2010, 24-27
11. Cettner, A., Söderholm, K. and Viklander, M. 2012. An adaptive stormwater culture? Historical perspectives on the status of stormwater within the Swedish urban water system. Journal of urban technology, (online) Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.673058 (Accessed 7 September 2012)
12. Chocat, B. 2007. Toward the sustainable management of urban storm-water. Indoor built environment, 16 (3): 273 - 285.
13. Cole, M. 2011. SuDS guidance sits on the fence. New civil engineer, 2 February (online) Available from: http://www.nce.co.uk/news/water/flooding-round-table/suds-guidance-sits-on-fence/8625740.article (Accessed 12 September 2012)
14. Digman, C., Ashley, R. M. and Balmforth, D. J. 2011. Retrofitting surface water management, London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
15. Faram, M. G. 2010. Appropriate drainage systems for a changing climate. Proceedings of the ICE - Engineering Sustainability, 163 (2): 107 - 116.
16. Global Economic Forum. 2011. Global risks 2011, 6th ed. An initiative of the Risk Response Network. January. (online) Available from: http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=17894 (Accessed 12 September 2012)
17. Gullstrand, M., Löwgren, M. and Castensson, R. 2003. Water issues in comprehensive municipal planning: a review of the Motala river basin. Journal of environmental management, 69 (2003): 239 - 247.
18. Healey, P. 2003. Book review: Shadows of power: an allegory of prudence in land use planning [online]. Available from: http://phg.sagepub.com/content/27/6/806.citation (Accessed 7 September 2012)
19. Hillier, J. 2007. Stretching beyond the horizon. A multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance, Farnham: Ashgate.
20. Hillier, J. 2008. Plan (e) speaking: a multiplanar theory of spatial planning. Planning Theory, 7 (1): 24 - 50.
21. Kato, S. and Ahern, J. 2008. 'Learning by doing': adaptive planning as a strategy to address uncertainty in planning. Journal of environmental planning and management, 51 (4): 543 - 559.
22. Lukes, S. 2002. Review article: power and agency. British journal of sociology, 53 (3): 491 - 496.
23. Malbert, B. 2007. " Communication of green issues in urban planning ". In Green structures in the sustainable city, Edited by: Wlodarczyk, D. Uppsala, Sweden: The Baltic University Press, 22-25.
24. Mayor of London. 2011. Securing London's water future: The Mayor's Water Strategy [online]. Available from: http://www.london.gov.uk [Accessed 10 October 2011]
25. Melbourne Water. 2005. WSUD engineering procedures: Stormwater, Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
26. Mellström, U. " Teknik och maskulinitet ". Edited by: Berner, B. Vem tillhör tekniken? Kunskap och kön i teknikens värld. Lund: Arkiv Förlag, 57-76
27. Middlesex University. 2003. Review of the use of stormwater BMPs in Europe Report 5.1. Daywater WP/Task/Deliverable N°: WP5/T5.1/D5
28. Morison, P. J., Brown, R. R. and Cocklin, C. 2010. Transitioning to a waterways city: municipal context, capacity and commitment. Water science and technology, 62 (1): 162 - 171.
29. NAO. 2004. Out of sight - not out of mind, National Audit Office. (online) Available from: http://www.nao.org.uk [Accessed 10 October 2011]
30. Palme, U. 2010. Multiple conceptions of sustainable urban water systems: a problem or asset?. Water policy, 12 (3): 425 - 443.
31. Potter, K. 2011. Engineers and planners: sustainable water management alliances. Engineering sustainability, 164, ES4: 239 - 247.
32. Semadeni-Davies, A. 2006. Winter performance of an urban stormwater pond in southern Sweden. Hydrological processes, 20 (1): 165 - 182.
33. Stahre, P. and Geldof, G. D. 2003. New approach to sustainable stormwater planning [online]. Available from: http://www.greenroof.se [Accessed 10 April 2011]
34. Stahre, P. 2008. Blue-green fingerprints in the city of Malmö [online]. Available from: http://www.vasyd.se/fingerprints (Accessed 7 September 2012)
35. SOU. 2007. Klimat- och sårbarhetsutredningen. Miljödepartementet, Statens offentliga utredningar, 2007: 60
36. Trost, J. 2010. Kvalitativa intervjuer, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
37. USEPA. 2010. Green infrastructure case studies: municipal policies for managing stormwater with green infrastructure [online]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov [Accessed 10 November 2011]
38. Van Herk, S. 2011. Learning and Action Alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: a new framework from empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Environmental science and policy, 14 (5): 543 - 554.
39. Walker, W. 2000. Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Research policy, 29 (7-8): 833 - 846.
40. White, I. 2010. Water and the city, Abingdon: Routledge.
41. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research, design and methods, London: Sage Publications.