Causality between energy and output in the long-run

Energy Economics

Volumn 39, Issue , 2013, Pages 135-146

  Stern, David I ^a   Enflo, Kerstin ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Energy; Granger causality; Macroeconomics; Sweden

Indexed keywords

COINTEGRATION; ENERGY; GRANGER CAUSALITY; MACROECONOMICS; SWEDEN;

ENERGY RESOURCES;

ECONOMICS;

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; MACROECONOMICS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ENERGY RESOURCE; TIME SERIES;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84878944640     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bauer D., Maynard A. Persistence-robust surplus-lag Granger causality testing. J. Econ. 2012, 169(2):293-300.
2. Blanchard O.J., Galí J. The macroeconomic effects of oil price shocks: why are the 2000s so different from the 1970s?. International Dimensions of Monetary Policy 2008, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J. Galí, M.J. Gertler (Eds.).
3. Burbridge J., Harrison A. Testing for the effects of oil price rises using vector autoregressions. Int. Econ. Rev. 1984, 25:459-484.
4. Chen B., Pearl J. Regression and causation: a critical examination of econometrics textbooks. Technical Report R-395 2012, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles.
5. Chiou-Wei S.Z., Chen C.-F., Zhu Z. Economic growth and energy consumption revisited - Evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:3063-3076.
6. Choi I., Saikkonen P. Tests for nonlinear cointegration. Econ. Theory 2010, 26(2010):682-709.
7. Chontanawat J., Hunt L.C., Pierse R. Does energy consumption cause economic growth? Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries. J. Policy Model. 2008, 30:209-220.
8. Clarke J.A., Mirza S. A comparison of some common methods for detecting Granger noncausality. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 2006, 76:207-231.
9. Costantini V., Martini C. The causality between energy consumption and economic growth: a multi-sectoral analysis using non-stationary cointegrated panel data. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:591-603.
10. Edelstein P., Kilian L. How sensitive are consumer expenditures to retail energy prices?. J. Monet. Econ. 2009, 56(6):766-779.
11. Ferraro P.J., Hanauer K.M. Causal Mechanisms of Protected Areas on Poverty. Paper presented at the AIJOS Capstone Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, September 2011.
12. Gales B., Kander A., Malanima P., Rubio M. North versus South: energy transition and energy intensity in Europe over 200years. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 2007, 11(2):219-253.
13. Gerring J. Causal mechanisms: yes, but. .. Comp. Polit. Stud. 2010, 43(11):1499-1526.
14. Ghali K.H., El-Sakka M.I.T. Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy Econ. 2004, 26:225-238.
15. Giles D.E.A., Godwin R.T. Testing for multivariate cointegration in the presence of structural breaks: p values and critical values. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2012, 19:1561-1565.
16. Glasure Y.U. Energy and national income in Korea: further evidence on the role of omitted variables. Energy Econ. 2002, 24:355-365.
17. Granger C.W.J. Some recent developments in a concept of causality. J. Econ. 1988, 39:199-211.
18. Greasley D., Madsen J.B., Wohar M.E. Long-run growth empirics and new challenges for unified theory. Appl. Econ. 2013, 45:3973-3987.
19. Hamilton J.D. Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. J. Polit. Econ. 1983, 91:228-248.
20. Hamilton J.D. Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007-08. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2009, (1):215-261.
21. Hamilton J.D. Understanding crude oil prices. Energy J. 2009, 30(2):179-206.
22. Hassani H., Zhigljavsky A., Patterson K., Soofi A. A comprehensive causality test based on the singular spectrum analysis. Causality in Science 2010, Oxford University Press. P.M. Illari, F. Russo, J. Williamson (Eds.).
23. Heckman J.J. Econometric causality. Int. Stat. Rev. 2008, 76(1):1-27.
24. Hiemstra C., Jones J.D. Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. J. Finance 1994, 49(5):1639-1664.
25. Hondroyiannis G., Lolos S., Papapetrou E. Energy consumption and economic growth: assessing the evidence from Greece. Energy Econ. 2002, 24:319-336.
26. International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook April 2011: Tensions from the Two-Speed Recovery Unemployment, Commodities, and Capital Flows 2011, International Monetary Fund Publication Services, Washington DC.
27. Johansen S., Mosconi R., Nielsen B. Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. Econ. J. 2000, 3:216-249.
28. Joyeux R. Structural breaks in cointegration analysis: an applied analysis. Cointegration for the Applied Economist 2007, Palgrave Macmillan. 2nd ed. B. Bhaskara Rao (Ed.).
29. Joyeux R., Ripple R.D. Energy consumption and real income: a panel cointegration multi-country study. Energy J. 2011, 32(2):107-141.
30. Juselius K. The Cointegrated VAR Model: Methodology and Applications 2006, Oxford University Press.
31. 2 emissions in Sweden 1800-2000. Lund Studies in Economic History 19 2002.
32. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. J. Energy Dev. 1978, 3:401-403.
33. Krantz O., Schön L. Swedish historical national accounts 1800-2000. Lund Studies in Economic History 41 2007.
34. Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P.C.B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against an alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. J. Econ. 1992, 54:159-178.
35. Lee C.-C., Chang C.-P. Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: a more comprehensive analysis using panel data. Resour. Energy Econ. 2008, 30(1):50-65.
36. Lee J., Strazicich M.C. Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2003, 85(4):1048-1062.
37. Lee J., Strazicich M.C. Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Appalachian State University Working Paper 0417 2004.
38. Lee C.-C., Chang C.-P., Chen P.-F. Energy-income causality in OECD countries revisited: the key role of capital stock. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:2359-2373.
39. Lütkepohl H. Non-causality due to omitted variables. J. Econ. 1982, 19:367-378.
40. Lütkepohl H., Saikkonen P., Trenkler C. Testing for the cointegrating rank of a VAR with level shift at unknown time. Econometrica 2004, 72:647-662.
41. Malanima P. Energy consumption in Italy in the 19th and 20th century. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 2006, Instituto di Studi sulle Società del Mediterraneo.
42. Masih A.M.M., Masih R. On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income, and prices: some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/vector error-correction approach. J. Policy Model. 1997, 19:417-440.
43. Oh W., Lee K. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970-1999. Energy Econ. 2004, 26:51-59.
44. Ohanian L.E. The spurious effects of unit roots on vector autoregressions: a Monte Carlo study. J. Econ. 1988, 39:251-266.
45. Ozturk I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010, 38:340-349.
46. Park J.V., Sung J. Testing for unit roots in models with structural-change. Econ. Theory 1994, 10(5):917-936.
47. Phillips P., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. J. Econ. 1988, 33:335-346.
48. Qin D. Rise of VAR modeling approach. J. Econ. Surv. 2011, 25(1):156-174.
49. Sargent T. Estimating vector autoregressions using methods not based on explicit economic theories, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Q. Rev. 1979, 3(3):8-15.
50. Schön L. Sweden - Economic Growth and Structural Change, 1800-2000. EH.Net Encyclopedia 2008, (February 10, 2008. URL: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/schon.sweden). R. Whaples (Ed.).
51. Schön L. Sweden's Road to Modernity: An Economic History 2010, SNS Förlag, Stockholm.
52. Schwert G.W. Tests for unit roots: a Monte Carlo investigation. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1989, 7:147-159.
53. Sims C.A. Money, income and causality. Am. Econ. Rev. 1972, 62:540-552.
54. Sims C.A. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 1980, 48:1-48.
55. Stanley T.D., Jarrell S.B., Doucouliagos H. Could it be better to discard 90% of the data? A statistical paradox. Am. Stat. 2010, 64(1):70-77.
56. Stern D.I. Energy use and economic growth in the USA: a multivariate approach. Energy Econ. 1993, 15:137-150.
57. Stern D.I. A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the U.S. macroeconomy. Energy Econ. 2000, 22:267-283.
58. Stern D.I. Energy quality. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(7):1471-1478.
59. Stern D.I. The role of energy in economic growth. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1219:26-51.
60. Stern D.I., Common M.S. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2001, 41:162-178.
61. Stern D.I., Kander A. The role of energy in the industrial revolution and modern economic growth. Energy J. 2012, 33(3):125-152.
62. Sugihara G., May R., Ye H., Hsieh C.-H., Deyle E., Fogarty M., Munch S. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science 2012, 338:496-500.
63. Sun X. Assessing nonlinear Granger causality from multivariate time series. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2008, 5212:440-455. Springer, Heidelberg. W. Daelemans, B. Goethals, K. Morik (Eds.).
64. Toda H.Y., Phillips P.C.B. The spurious effect of unit roots on vector autoregressions: an analytical study. J. Econ. 1993, 59:229-255.
65. Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J. Econ. 1995, 66:225-250.
66. Vaona A. Granger non-causality between (non)renewable energy consumption and output in Italy since 1861: the (ir)relevance of structural breaks. Energy Policy 2012, 45:226-236.
67. Warr B., Ayres R.U. Evidence of causality between the quantity and quality of energy consumption and economic growth. Energy 2010, 35:1688-1693.
68. Wilde J. Effects of simultaneity on testing Granger-causality - a cautionary note about statistical problems and economic misinterpretations. Working Paper, Institute for Empirical Economic Research, Univeristy of Osnabrück 2012, 93.
69. Yu E.S.H., Jin J.C. Cointegration tests of energy consumption, income, and employment. Resour. Energy 1992, 14:259-266.