Patients suspected of irritable bowel syndrome-Cross-sectional study exploring the sensitivity of rome iii criteria in primary care

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 972-980

  Engsbro, Anne Line ^a,b   Begtrup, Luise Mølenberg ^c,d   Kjeldsen, Jens ^d   Larsen, Pia Veldt ^c   De Muckadell, Ove Schaffalitzky ^d   Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg ^c   Bytzer, Peter ^a,b  

^a Department of Medicine   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEFECATION DISORDER; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; IRRITABLE COLON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROME III CRITERIA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DEFECATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878942911     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.15     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012 ; 10 : 712-21.
2. Rubin G, de WN, Meineche-Schmidt V et al. Th e diagnosis of IBS in primary care: consensus development using nominal group technique. Fam Pract 2006 ; 23 : 687-92.
3. Casiday RE, Hungin AP, Cornford CS et al. GPs ' explanatory models for irritable bowel syndrome: a mismatch with patient models? Fam Pract 2009 ; 26 : 34-9.
4. Bijkerk CJ, de Wit NJ, Stalman WA et al. Irritable bowel syndrome in primary care: the patients' and doctors' views on symptoms, etiology and management. Can J Gastroenterol 2003 ; 17 : 363-8. (Pubitemid 36958163)
5. Seifert B, Rubin G, de WN et al. Th e management of common gastrointestinal disorders in general practice. A survey by the European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG) in six European countries. Dig Liver Dis 2008 ; 40 : 659-66.
6. Lea R, Hopkins V, Hastleton J et al. Diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: utility and applicability in clinical practice. Digestion 2004 ; 70 : 210-3. (Pubitemid 40522765)
7. Th ompson WG, Heaton KW, Smyth GT et al. Irritable bowel syndrome: the view from general practice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997 ; 9 : 689-92. (Pubitemid 27315621)
8. Spiegel BM, Farid M, Esrailian E et al. Is irritable bowel syndrome a diagnosis of exclusion?: a survey of primary care providers, gastroenterologists, and IBS experts. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 ; 105 : 848-58.
9. Manning AP, Th ompson WG, Heaton KW et al. Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br Med J 1978 ; 2 : 653-4. (Pubitemid 9004104)
10. Drossman D, Richter JE, Talley NJ et al. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment. Little, Brown: Boston 1994.
11. Th ompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999 ; 45 (Suppl 2) : II43-7. (Pubitemid 29434812)
12. Longstreth GF, Th ompson WG, Chey WD et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006 ; 130 : 1480-91.
13. Quigley E, Fried M, Gwee KA et al. WGO Practice Guideline-Irritable bowel syndrome: a global perspective. www.worldgastroenterology.org 2009 : 25-7-2011.
14. American Gastroenterological Association. Medical position statement: irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2002 ; 123 : 2105-7.
15. Brandt LJ, Chey WD, Foxx-Orenstein AE et al. An evidence-based position statement on the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 ; 104 (Suppl 1) : S1-35.
16. Spiller R, Aziz Q, Creed F et al. Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut 2007 ; 56 : 1770-98. (Pubitemid 350206308)
17. Quigley EM, Bergman F, Bytzer P et al. Systematic review on the management of irritable bowel syndrome in the European Union. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 ; 19 : S11-37.
18. Spiller RC, Th ompson WG. Bowel disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 ; 105 : 775-85.
19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical practice guideline. Irritable bowel syndrome in adults: diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome in primary care. 2008 : 15-11-2011.
20. Whitehead WE, Drossman DA. Validation of symptom-based diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: a critical review. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 ; 105 : 814-20.
21. Whitehead WE, Palsson OS, Feld AD et al. Utility of red fl ag symptom exclusions in the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2006 ; 24 : 137-46. (Pubitemid 43894014)
22. Anastasiou F, Mouzas IA, Moschandreas J et al. Exploring the agreement between diagnostic criteria for IBS in primary care in Greece. BMC Res Notes 2008 ; 1 : 127.
23. Yao X, Yang YS, Cui LH et al. Subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome on Rome III criteria: a multicenter study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012 ; 27 : 760-5.
24. Park DW, Lee OY, Shim SG et al. Th e diff erences in prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome II and Rome III. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010 ; 16 : 186-93.
25. Engsbro AL, Simren M, Bytzer P. Th e Rome II and Rome III criteria identify the same subtype-populations in irritable bowel syndrome: agreement depends on the method used for symptom report. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012 ; 24 : 604-11, e266.
26. Dorn SD, Morris CB, Hu Y et al. Irritable bowel syndrome subtypes defi ned by Rome II and Rome III criteria are similar. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009 ; 43 : 214-20.
27. Garrigues V, Mearin F, Badia X et al. Change over time of bowel habit in irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective, observational, 1-year follow-up study (RITMO study). Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2007 ; 25 : 323-32. (Pubitemid 46115402)
28. Ersryd A, Posserud I, Abrahamsson H et al. Subtyping the irritable bowel syndrome by predominant bowel habit: Rome II versus Rome III. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2007 ; 26 : 953-61. (Pubitemid 47346699)
29. Begtrup L, Engsbro A, Kjeldsen J et al. A positive diagnostic strategy is non-inferior to a strategy of exclusion for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol advance online publication, 25 January 2013. pii:S1542-3565(13)00096-7 (e-pub ahead of print).
30. Rome Committee. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Module. http://romecriteria.org/pdfs/IBSMode pdf (Accessed 22/12/2011) 2011.
31. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 ; 25 : 3186-91. (Pubitemid 32042951)
32. Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS-a clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci 1988 ; 33 : 129-34. (Pubitemid 18054672)
33. Wiklund IK, Fullerton S, Hawkey CJ et al. An irritable bowel syndromespecifi c symptom questionnaire: development and validation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003 ; 38 : 947-54. (Pubitemid 37153623)
34. Ware Jr JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 ; 25 : 3130-9.
35. Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Whitehead WE et al. Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specifi c quality-of-life questionnaire. Am J Gastroenterol 2000 ; 95 : 999-1007. (Pubitemid 30196737)
36. Patrick DL, Drossman DA, Frederick IO et al. Quality of life in persons with irritable bowel syndrome: development and validation of a new measure. Dig Dis Sci 1998 ; 43 : 400-11. (Pubitemid 28124621)
37. Reilly MC, Bracco A, Ricci JF et al. Th e validity and accuracy of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire-irritable bowel syndrome version (WPAI:IBS). Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2004 ; 20 : 459-67. (Pubitemid 39120258)
38. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. Th e hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 ; 67 : 361-70.
39. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Florida, 1991.
40. Moth G, Vedsted P, et Olesen F. Review on contact and disease patterns in primary care [in Danish]-KOS 2008. Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University: Aarhus, Denmark, 2010.
41. Hungin AP. Th e prevalence, patterns and impact of irritable bowel syndrome: an international survey of 40,000 subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2003 ; 17 : 643-50. (Pubitemid 36418887)
42. Chey WD, Olden K, Carter E et al. Utility of the Rome I and Rome II criteria for irritable bowel syndrome in U.S. women. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 ; 97 : 2803-11. (Pubitemid 35265432)
43. Vandvik PO, Aabakken L, Farup PG. Diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome: poor agreement between general practitioners and the Rome II criteria. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004 ; 39 : 448-53. (Pubitemid 38626624)
44. Lee V, Guthrie E, Robinson A et al. Functional bowel disorders in primary care: factors associated with health-related quality of life and doctor consultation. J Psychosom Res 2008 ; 64 : 129-38.
45. Trochim W. M. Th e Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2nd edn. Internet WWW page, at URL: < http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/> (version current as of 20 October 2006).
46. Longstreth GF. Defi nition and classifi cation of irritable bowel syndrome: current consensus and controversies. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2005 ; 34 : 173-87. (Pubitemid 40615949)