Web 2.0 and Information Literacy Instruction: Aligning Technology with ACRL Standards

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 244-251

  Magnuson, Marta L ^a  

^a CARTHAGE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education; Constructivism; Information literacy; Online education; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878937979     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association of School Librarians (AASL) Standards for the 21st century learner 2007, (Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_LearningStandards.pdf).
2. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Information literacy competency standards for higher education 2000, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
3. Bobish G. Participation and pedagogy: Connecting the social web to ACRL learning outcomes. Journal of Academic of Librarianship 2011, 37(1):54-63.
4. Bussert K., Brown N., Armstrong A. IL 2.0 at The American University in Cairo: Flickr in the classroom. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 2008, 13(1):1-13.
5. Casey M.E. Working towards a definition of Library 2.0 2005, October 21, ([web log] Retrieved from: http://www.librarycrunch.com/2005/10/working_towards_a_definition_o.html).
6. Casey M.E., Savastinuk L.C. Library 2.0. Library Journal 2006, 131(14):40-42.
7. Chan C., Cmor D. Blogging toward information literacy: Engaging students and facilitating peer learning. Reference Services Review 2009, 37(4):395-407.
8. Library 2.0: Initiatives in academic libraries 2007, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL. L.B. Cohen (Ed.).
9. Coulter P., Draper L. Blogging it into them: Weblogs in information literacy instruction. Journal of Library Administration 2006, 45(1/2):101-115.
10. Deitering A. Using Wikipedia to eavesdrop on the scholarly conversation. Information literacy meets Library 2.0 (87-93) 2008, Facet Publishing, London, England. P. Godwin, J. Parker (Eds.).
11. Draper L., Turnage M. Blogmania: Blog use in academic libraries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 2008, 13(1):15-55.
12. Glesne C.E. Becoming qualitative researchers 2006, Pearson, New York. 3rd ed.
13. Godwin P. Information literacy and Web 2.0: Is it just hype?. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 2009, 43(3):264-274.
14. Grassian E.S., Kaplowitz J.R. Information literacy instruction: Theory and practice 2009, Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
15. Jenkins H. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century 2006, (Retrieved from http://newmedialiteracies.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf).
16. Kaptelinin V., Nardi B., Macaulay C. The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions 1999, 6(4):27-39.
17. Kirkpatrick D. Evaluating training programs: The four levels 1998, Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, CA.
18. Kroski E. Web 2.0 for librarians and information professionals 2008, Neal-Schuman, New York, NY.
19. Lévy P. Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace 1997, Perseus Books, Cambridge: MA.
20. Luo L. Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: An overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010, 36(1):32-40.
21. Mackey T.P., McLaughlin J. Developing blog and wiki communities to link student research, community service, and collaborative discourse. Using technology to teach information literacy 2008, 5-28. Neal-Schuman, New York, NY. T.P. Mackey, T.E. Jacobson (Eds.).
22. Maggio L., Bresnahan M., Flynn D., Harzbecker J., Blanchard M., Ginn D. A case study: Using social tagging to engage students in learning Medical Subject Headings. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2009, 97(2):77-83.
23. Magnuson, M.L. (2012). Construction and Reflection: Using Web 2.0 to Foster Engagement with Technology for Information Literacy Instruction. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 3520737.
24. Markham A.N. The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005, 793-820. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
25. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software 2005, August 30, [web log post], (Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html).
26. Scholz T. Market ideology and the myths of Web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(3). (Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945).
27. Vygotsky L.S. Mind and society 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and method 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
29. Zazzau V.E. Exploring wikis in a library credit course. Communications in Information Literacy 2009, 3(1):58-64.