Evaluating the outcomes of collaborative modeling for decision support

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 693-699

  Michaud, William R ^a  

^a GENERAL DYNAMICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative modeling; Decision support systems; Evaluation; Integrated water resources management; Public participation; Water resources planning

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE MODELING; EVALUATION; INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; WATER RESOURCES PLANNING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SURVEYS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 84878931051     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: 17521688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12066     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allan, T., 2003. IWRM/IWRAM: A New Sanctioned Discourse? Occasional Paper 50. SOAS Water Issues Study Group, School of Oriental and African Studies/King's College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
2. Antunes, P., G. Kallis, N. Videira, and R. Santos, 2009. Participation and Evaluation for Sustainable River Basin Governance. Ecological Economics 6:931-939.
3. Bourget, E. (Editor), 2011. Converging Waters, Integrating Collaborative Modeling with Participatory Processes to Make Water Resource Decisions. U.S. Institute for Water Resources, Maass-White Series. Alexandria, Virginia.
4. Gooch, G.D. and D. Huitema, 2008 Participation in Water Management: Theory and Practice. In: The Adaptiveness of IWRM: Analysing European IWRM Research, J.G. Timmerman, C. Pahl-Wostl, and J. Möltgen (Editors). IWA Publishing, London, United Kingdom.
5. ICWE, 1992. The Dublin Statement and Report of the Conference. International Conference on Water and the Environment: Development Issues for the 21st Century, 26-31 January, Dublin, Ireland.
6. Jordana, J. and D. Sancho, 2004. Regulatory Designs, Institutional Constellations and the Study of the Regulatory State. In: The Politics of Regulation. Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (Editors). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 296-319.
7. Langsdale, S., A. Beall, E. Bourget, E. Hagen, S. Kudlas, R. Palmer, D. Tate, and B. Werick, 2011. Collaborative Modeling for Decision Support in Water Resources: Principles and Best Practices. Environmental Water Resources Institute, Reston, Virginia and Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, Virginia, http://www.computeraideddisputeresolution.us/bestpractices/, accessed April 5, 2013.
8. Langsdale, S.M., 2007. Participatory Model Building for Exploring Water Management and Climate Change Futures in the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia, Canada. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
9. Lorie, M., 2010. Computer-Aided Dispute Resolution 2nd Workshop: Summary and Strategic Plan. Institute for Water Resources, Report 2010-R-5, Alexandria, Virginia.
10. Michaud, W.R., 2009. Performance Measures to Assess the Benefits of Shared Vision Planning and Other Collaborative Modeling Processes. U.S. Institute for Water Resources, Report No. 2009-R-07, Alexandria, Virginia.
11. Mostert, E., 2003. The Challenge of Public Participation. Water Policy 5(2):179-197.
12. Rouwette, E.A.J.A., J.A.M. Vennix, and T. van Mullekom, 2002. Group Model Building, a Review of Assessment Studies. System Dynamics Review 18:1 (Spring) 5-45.
13. Stephenson, K., L. Shabman, S. Langsdale, and H. Cardwell, 2007. Computer Aided Dispute Resolution: Proceedings from the CADRe Workshop. U.S. Institute for Water Resources, Report 2007-R-06, Alexandria, Virginia.
14. Urban, J.B. and W. Trochim, 2009. The Role of Evaluation in Research Practice Integration: Working Toward the "Golden Spike". American Journal of Evaluation 30(4):538-553.
15. USIECR (U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution), 2008. Mediation Participant Evaluation (Agreement Seeking). OMB No. 3320-0004. http://www.ecr.gov/Resources/EvaluationProgram.aspx, accessed April 5, 2013.
16. Van de Kerkhof, V., 2004. Debating Climate Change: A Study of Stakeholder Participation in an Integrated Assessment of Long-Term Climate Policy in the Netherlands. Lemma Publishers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
17. van den Belt, M., 2004. Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
18. Werick, W. and R. Palmer, 2009. When Should Shared Vision Planning Be Used? http://www.sharedvisionplanning.us/docs/IsSharedVisionPlanningRightforYou.pdf, accessed April 5, 2013.