Decision makers and socializers, social networks and the role of individuals as participants

Transportation

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 755-771

  Deutsch, Kathleen ^a   Goulias, Konstadinos G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Destination choice; Social networks; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKERS; DESTINATION CHOICE; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; LATENT CLASS CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MODELING AND SIMULATION; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; TRAVEL BEHAVIORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; SOCIAL NETWORK; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; SANTA BARBARA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878920145     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-013-9465-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179-211 (1991).
2. Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.: Social networks, social interactions and activity-travel behavior: a framework for microsimulation. Environ. Plan. Part B 35, 1012-1027 (2008).
3. Axhausen, K.: Social network and travel: some hypotheses. In: Donaghy, K., Poppelreuter, S., Rudinger, G. (eds.) Social aspects of sustainable transport: transatlantic perspectives, pp. 90-108. Ashgate, Altershot, Hants (2005).
4. Axhausen, K.: Activity spaces, biographies, social networks and their welfare gains and externalities: some hypotheses and empirical results. Mobilities 2(1), 15-36 (2007).
5. Bhat, C. R., Paleti, R., Pendyala, R. M., Goulias, K. G.: SimAGENT activity-based travel demand analysis: framework, behavioral models, and application results. SimAGENT Core Models. Phase 2 Final Report 4 Submitted to SCAG, Santa Barbara (2012).
6. Bourdieu, P.: Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984).
7. Bourdieu, P.: Practical reason: on the theory of action. Stanford Press, Stanford (1998).
8. Carrasco, J., Miller, E.: Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach. Transportation 33, 463-480 (2006).
9. Carrasco, J., Miller, E.: The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals. Transp. Res. Part A 43(1), 90-104 (2009).
10. Gliebe, J., Koppleman, F.: A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation 29(1), 49-72 (2002).
11. Golob, T., McNally, M.: A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transp. Res. Part B 31(3), 177-194 (1997).
12. Goulias, K. G., Henson, K. M.: On altruists and egoists in activity participation and travel: who are they and do they live together? Transportation 33(5), 447-462 (2006).
13. Goulias, K. G., Kim, T.: An analysis of activity type classification and issues related to the with whom and for whom questions of an activity diary. In: Timmermans, H. (ed.) Progress in activity-based analysis. Chapter 14, pp. 309-334. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004).
14. Habib, K. and Carrasco, J.: Investigating the role of social networks in start time and duration of activities: a trivariate simultaneous econometric model. Presented at the Transportation Research Board meeting, 2011.
15. Habib, K., Carrasco, J., Miller, E.: Social context of activity scheduling. Discrete-continuous model of relationships between "with whom" and episode start time and duration. Transp. Res. Rec. 2076, 81-87 (2008).
16. Harvey, A., Taylor, M.: Activity settings and travel behavior: a social contact perspective. Transportation 27(1), 53-73 (2000).
17. Kitamura, R.: An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation 15, 9-34 (1998).
18. Páez, A., Scott, D.: Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environ. Plan. 39, 647-665 (2007).
19. Salomon, I.: Telecommunications and travel: substitution or modified mobility? J. Transp. Econ. Policy. 19(3), 219-235 (1985).
20. Scott, J.: Social network analysis. Sociology 22, 109-127 (1988).
21. Sener, I. N., Bhat, C. R.: An analysis of the social context of children's weekend discretionary activity participation. Transportation 34(6), 697-721 (2007).
22. Vermunt, J. K., Magidson, J.: Technical guide for latent gold 4. 0: basic and advanced. Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont (2005).
23. Yoon, S., Goulias, K.: Constraint-based assessment of intra-household bargaining on time allocation to activities and travel using individual accessibility measures. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2010.