Environmental significance of magnetic properties of Gley soils near Rosslau (Germany)

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1719-1732

  Jordanova, Diana ^a   Jordanova, Neli ^a   Werban, Ulrike ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS   (Bulgaria)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conductivity; Environmental magnetism; Magnetic susceptibility; Pedotransfer functions; Soil

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; ANHYSTERETIC REMANENT MAGNETIZATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL MAGNETISM; ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE; ISOTHERMAL REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTIC; PEDO-TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; THERMOMAGNETIC ANALYSIS;

AGRICULTURE; CARBON; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NUTRIENTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS; SULFUR;

MAGNETISM;

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; CARBON; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FLUVISOL; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; GLEYSOL; IRON OXIDE; MAGNETIC MINERAL; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NITROGEN; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; PH; PRECISION AGRICULTURE; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; SOIL HORIZON; SULFUR; TOPOGRAPHY;

GERMANY; ROSSLAU; SAXONY-ANHALT;

EID: 84878916083     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-2006-3     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Blake W, Wallbrink P, Doerr S, Shakesby R, Humphreys G (2006) Magnetic enhancement in wildfire-affected soil and its potential for sediment-source ascription. Earth Surf Proc Land 31: 249-264.
2. Brevik E, Fenton T, Lazari A (2006) Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping. Precis Agric 7: 393-404.
3. Callegary JB, Ferré TPA, Groom RW (2007) Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. Vadose Zone J 6: 158-167.
4. Cambouris A, Nolin M, Zebarth B, Laverdière M (2006) Soil management zones delineated by electrical conductivity to characterize spatial and temporal variations in potato yield and in soil properties. Am J Potato Res 83: 381-395.
5. Clay D, Chang J, Malo D, Carlson C, Reese C, Clay S, Ellsbury M, Berg B (2001) Factors influencing spatial variability of soil apparent electrical conductivity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 2993-3008.
6. Conyers L, Ernenwein E, Grealy M, Lowe K (2008) Electromagnetic conductivity mapping for site prediction in meandering river floodplains. Archaeol Prospect 15: 81-91.
7. Corwin D, Lesch S (2005) Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: I. Survey protocols. Comput Electron Agric 46(1-3): 103-133 (SPEC. ISS.).
8. Corwin D, Lesch S, Oster J, Kaffka S (2006) Monitoring management-induced spatio-temporal changes in soil quality through soil sampling directed by apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 131: 369-387.
9. Dearing J (1999) Magnetic susceptibility. In: Walden J, Ofdfield F, Smith J (eds) Environmental magnetism. A practical guide. Technical guide no 6. Quaternary Research Association, London, pp 35-62.
10. Dearing J, Morton R, Price T, Foster I (1986) Tracing movements of topsoil by magnetic measurements: two case studies. Phys Earth Planet Inter 42: 93-104.
11. Dearing J, Lees J, White C (1995) Mineral magnetic properties of acid gleyed soils under oak and Corsican Pine. Geoderma 68: 309-319.
12. DIN ISO 10694 (1996-2008) Soil quality-determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis). Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
13. DIN ISO 13878 (1998) Soil quality-determination of total nitrogen content by dry combustion (elemental analysis). Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
14. Dunlop D, Ozdemir O (1997) Rock magnetism. Fundamentals and frontiers. In: Edwards D (ed) Cambridge studies in magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Fallick A, Pillinger C (1979) Hydrolysable carbon, magnetic susceptibility and isothermal remanent magnetisation measurements of highland sample 68501: comments on carbon content and size distribution of finely divided lunar iron. Proc Lunar Planet Sci Conf 10th, pp 1469-1481.
16. Fitzpatrick R, Thomas M, Davies P, Williams B (2003) Dry saline land: an investigation using ground-based geophysics, soil survey and spatial methods near Jamestown, South Australia. CSIRO Land and Water, Technical Report 55/03, pp 1-41.
17. Grimley D, Vepraskas M (2000) Magnetic susceptibility for use in delineating hydric soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 2174-2180.
18. Hanesch M, Scholger R (2002) Mapping of heavy metal loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Environ Geol 42: 857-870.
19. Hanesch M, Stanjek H, Petersen N (2006) Thermomagnetic measurements of soil iron minerals: the role of organic carbon. Geophys J Int 165: 53-61.
20. Hanesch M, Rantitsch G, Hemetsberger S, Scholger R (2007) Lithological and pedological influences on the magnetic susceptibility of soil: Their consideration in magnetic pollution mapping. Sci Total Environ 382: 351-363.
21. Jordanova N, Jordanova D, Veneva L, Yorova K, Petrovsky E (2003) Magnetic response of soils and vegetation to heavy metal pollution-a case study. Environ Sci Technol 37: 4417-4424.
22. Jordanova N, Jordanova D, Ts Tsacheva (2008) Application of magnetometry for delineation of anthropogenic pollution in areas covered by various soil types. Geoderma 144(3-4): 557-571.
23. Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Petrov P, Tsacheva T (2010) Soil development of three Chernozem-like profiles from North Bulgaria revealed by magnetic studies. Catena 83(2-3): 158-169.
24. Jordanova N, Jordanova D, Petrov P (2011) Magnetic imprints of pedogenesis in Planosols and Stagnic Alisol from Bulgaria. Geoderma 160: 477-489.
25. Kemmitt SJ, Wright D, Goulding KWT, Jones DL (2006) pH regulation of carbon and nitrogen dynamics in two agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 898-911.
26. Keruzoré A, Scholz M (2007) First amphibian inventory in the recently reconnected floodplain of Rosslau, Saxony Anhalt, Germany, analysis of presence, abundance, distribution with implications for amphibian conservation, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany, Unpublished master degree report.
27. Kunkel ML, Flores AN, Smith TJ, McNamara JP, Benner SG (2011) A simplified approach for estimating soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in semi-arid complex terrain. Geoderma 165: 1-11.
28. Landgraf C, Royall D (2006) Spatial patterns of surface soil magnetism and soil redistribution across a fallow field, Northern Alabama. Southeast Geographer 46(1): 1-22.
29. Li X, Yang J, Liu M, Liu G, Yao R (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil salinity in typical arid area based on electromagnetic induction. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 26: 97-101.
30. Maher B (1998) Magnetic properties of modern soils and quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 137: 25-54.
31. McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89: 67-94.
32. Muller H, von Dobeneck T, Nehmiz W, Hamer K (2010) Near-surface electromagnetic, rock magnetic and geochemical fingerprinting of submarine freshwater seepage at Eckernforde Bay (SW Baltic Sea). Geo Marine Lett. doi: 10. 1007/s00367-010-0220-0.
33. Nüsch A-K, Dietrich P, Werban U, Behrens T (2010) Acquisition and reliability of geophysical data in soil science. In: 19th world congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Australia, 1-6 Aug 2010, pp S. 21-S. 24, extended abstract.
34. O'Reilly W (1984) Rock and mineral magnetism. Blakie, Glasgow.
35. Petrovsky E, Elwood B (1999) Magnetic monitoring of air-, land- and water pollution. In: Maher B, Thompson R (eds) Quaternary climates, environments and magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 279-322.
36. Potter DK, Corbett PWM, Barclay SA, Haszeldine RS (2004) Quantification of illite content in sedimentary rocks using magnetic susceptibility-a rapid complement or alternative to X-ray diffraction. J Sediment Res 74: 730-735.
37. Powers JS, Schlesinger WH (2002) Relationships among soil carbon distributions and biophysical factors at nested spatial scales in rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Geoderma 109: 165-190.
38. Preetz H, Altfelder S, Hennings V, Igel J (2009) Classification of soil magnetic susceptibility and prediction of metal detector performance-case study of Angola. In: Harmon P, Broach J, Holloway J Jr. (eds) Detection and sensing of mines, explosive objects, and obscured targets XIV. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 7303. p 730313. doi: 10. 1117/12. 819394.
39. Royall D (2001) Use of mineral magnetic measurements to investigate soil erosion and sediment delivery in a small agricultural catchment in limestone terrain. Catena 46: 15-34.
40. Saey T, van Meirvenne M, Dewilde M, Wyffels F, De Smedt P, Meerschman E, Islam M, Meeuws F, Cockx L (2011) Combining multiple signals of an electromagnetic induction sensor to prospect land for metal objects. Near Surf Geophys 9: 309-317.
41. Schmidt K, Behrens T, Daumann J, Ramirez-Lopez L, Werban U, Dietrich P, Scholten T A comparison of calibration sampling schemes at the field scale. Geoderma (submitted).
42. Scholz M, Rupp H, Puhlmann G, Ilg C, Gerisch M, Dziock F, Follner K, Foeckler F, Glaeser J, Konjuchow F, Krüger F, Regner A, Schwarze E, von Tümpling W, Duquesne S, Liess M, Werban U, Zacharias S, Henle K (2009) Deichrückverlegungen in Sachsen-Anhalt und wissenschaftliche egleituntersuchungen am Beispiel des Roßlauer Oberluchs. In: Im Land Sachsen-Anhalt. 30 Jahre Biosphärenreservat Mittelelbe. Forschung und Management im Biosphärenreservat Mittelelbe, vol 46. pp 103-115.
43. Schulze M, Schlegel T (2007) Dike relocation in the Oberluch Roßlau [Deichrückverlegung im Oberluch Roßlau]. Wasser und Abfall 9: 35-40.
44. Shilton V, Booth C, Smith J, Giessa P, Mitchell D, Williams C (2005) Magnetic properties of urban street dust and their relationship with organic matter content in the West Midlands, UK. Atmos Environ 39: 3651-3659.
45. Simms J, Lobred A (2011). Application of magnetic susceptibility for wetlands delineation. J Environ Eng Geophys 16. doi: 10. 2113/JEEG16. 3. 105.
46. Simpson D, Lehouck A, Verdonck L, Vermeersch H, van Meirvenne M, Bourgeois J, Thoen E, Docter R (2009) Comparison between electromagnetic induction and fluxgate gradiometer measurements on the buried remains of a 17th century castle. J Appl Geophys 68: 294-300.
47. Siqueira DS, Marques J Jr, Matias SSR, Barrón V, Torrent J, Baffa O, Oliveira LC (2010) Correlation of properties of Brazilian Haplustalfs with magnetic susceptibility measurements. Soil Use Manag 26(4): 425-431.
48. Sun Y, Druecker H, Hartung E, Hueging H, Cheng Q, Zeng Q, Sheng W, Lin J, Roller O, Paetzold S, Schulze P (2011) Map-based investigation of soil physical conditions and crop yield using diverse sensor techniques. Soil Tillage Res 112: 149-158.
49. Sweely T (2005) Detecting "invisible" dwellings in the Maya area using electromagnetic induction: significant findings of a pilot study at Chau Hiix, Belize. Latin Am Antiq 16: 193-208.
50. Thompson R, Oldfield F (1986) Environmental magnetism. Allen & Unwin, Winchester.
51. Toushmalani R (2010) Application of geophysical methods in agriculture. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(12): 6433-6439.
52. van Breemen N (1988) Long-term chemical, mineralogical and morphological effects of iron-redox processes in periodically flooded soils. In: Stucki J, Goodman B, Schwertmann U (eds) Iron in soils and clay minerals, DNATO ASI Series. Reidel Publishing company, Dordrecht.
53. Vitharana U, van Meirvenne M, Simpson D, Cockx L, De Baerdemaeker J (2008) Key soil and topographic properties to delineate potential management classes for precision agriculture in the European loess area. Geoderma 143: 206-215.
54. Werban U, Behrens T, Cassiani G, Dietrich P (2010) iSOIL-An EU-level Project to Integrate Geophysics, Digital Soil Mapping and Soil Science. In: Viscarra-Rossel RA, McBratney A, Minasny B. Proximal Soil Sensing. Progress in Soil Science, vol 1. Springer Science + Business Media, pp 103-110. doi: 10. 1007/978-90-481-8859-8_8.
55. Xie S, Dearing J, Boyle J, Bloemendal J, Morse A (2001) Association between magnetic properties and element concentrations of Liverpool street dust and its implications. J Appl Geophys 48: 83-92.