ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 874-882

  Liu, Danping ^a   Zhou, Xiao Hua ^b,c  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

AUC; Biomarker combination; Covariate adjustment; Covariate standardization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84878899496     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Metz C.E. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978, 8(4):283-298.
2. Pepe M.S., Thompson M.L. Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy. Biostatistics 2000, 1(2):123-140.
3. Su J.Q., Liu J.S. Linear combinations of multiple diagnostic markers. J Am Stat Assoc 1993, 88(424):1350-1355.
4. Jiang Y., Metz C.E. A quadratic model for combining quantitative diagnostic assessments from radiologist and computer in computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 2006, 13(2):140-151.
5. Liu B., Metz C.E., Jiang Y. Effect of correlation on combining diagnostic information from two images of the same patient. Med Phys 2005, 32(11):3329-3338.
6. Liu C., Liu A., Halabi S. A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Statist Med 2011, 30(16):2005-2014.
7. Zou K.H., Bhagwat J.G., Carrino J.A. Statistical combination schemes of repeated diagnostic test data. Acad Radiol 2006, 13(5):566-572.
8. Pepe M.S. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., McClish D.K. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine 2011, Wiley, New York.
10. Pesce L.L., Metz C.E., Berbaum K.S. On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results. Acad Radiol 2010, 17(8):960-968.
11. Janes H., Pepe M.S. Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 168(1):89-97.
12. Janes H., Pepe M.S. Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve. Biometrika 2009, 96(2):371-382.
13. Liu D., Zhou X.H. Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard. Biometrics 2013, 69(1):91-100.
14. Dodd L.E., Pepe M.S. Semiparametric regression for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. J Am Stat Assoc 2003, 98(462):409-417.
15. Pepe M.S. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics 1998, 54(1):124-135.
16. Liu D., Zhou X.H. Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias. Biometrics 2011, 67(3):906-916.