Robotic vs laparoscopic hysterectomy - Reply

JAMA

Volumn 309, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 2320-2321

  Wright, Jason D ^a   Hershman, Dawn L ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING CURVE; LETTER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84878879770     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.5689     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB. The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):87-95.
2. Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, Onol FF. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(10):1633-1637.
3. Ghomi A, Littman P, Prasad A, Einarsson JI. Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS. 2007;11(2):190-194.
4. Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2972-2979.