Effectiveness of the transoral endoscopic vertical gastroplasty (TOGa®): A good balance between weight loss and complications, if compared with gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion

Obesity Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1897-1902

  Nanni, Giuseppe ^a   Familiari, Pietro ^a   Mor, Alessandro ^a   Iaconelli, Amerigo ^b   Perri, Vincenzo ^a   Rubino, Francesco ^a   Boldrini, Giuseppe ^a   Salerno, Maria Paola ^a   Leccesi, Laura ^b   Iesari, Samuele ^a   Sollazzi, Liliana ^b   Perilli, Valter ^b   Castagneto, Marco ^a   Mingrone, Gertrude ^b   Costamagna, Guido ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bariatric surgery; Biliopancreatic diversion; Gastric bypass; TOGa

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILIOPANCREATIC BYPASS; BODY MASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBID OBESITY; NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOMACH BYPASS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL INJURY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSORAL ENDOSCOPIC VERTICAL GASTROPLASTY; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADULT; BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTROPLASTY; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY, MORBID; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 84878875733     PISSN: 09608923     EISSN: 17080428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0770-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Int Med. 1991;115:956-961.
2. Devière J, Ojeda Valdes G, Cuevas Herrera L, et al. Safety, feasibility and weight loss after transoral gastroplasty: first human multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(3):589-98 Epub 2007 Nov 1. Erratum in: Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):599. PubMed PMID: 17973163.
3. Moreno C, Closset J, Dugardeyn S, et al. Transoral gastroplasty is safe, feasible, and induces significant weight loss in morbidly obese patients: results of the second human pilot study. Endoscopy. 2008;40(5):406-13. Erratum in: Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):537. PubMed PMID: 18459077.
4. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724-37. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2005 Apr 13;293(14):1728. PubMed PMID: 15479938.
5. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248-256.e5. Review. PubMed PMID: 19272486.
6. MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Forse RA, et al. Surgery for obesity - an update of a randomized trial. Obes Surg. 1995;5(2):145-50. PubMed PMID: 10733802.
7. Di Lorenzo N, Furbetta F, Favretti F, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding via pars flaccida versus perigastric positioning: technique, complications, and results in 2,549 patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(7):1519-23. Epub 2010 Mar 31. PubMed PMID: 20354885.
8. Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):168-75. PubMed PMID: 17476867.
9. American Society for Bariatric Surgery Standards Committee, 2004-2005, Oria HE, Carrasquilla C, et al. Guidelines for weight calculations and follow-up in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(1):67-8. PubMed PMID: 16925214.
10. Montero PN, Stefanidis D, Norton HJ, et al. Reported excess weight loss after bariatric surgery could vary significantly depending on calculation method: a plea for standardization. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011; 7(4):531-534.
11. Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):565-8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):996.
12. Baltasar A, Serra C, Bou R, et al. Expected body mass index after bariatric surgery. Cir Esp. 2009;86(5):308-12. Epub 2009 Jul 31. PubMed PMID: 19646684.
13. Dixon JB, McPhail T, O'Brien PE. Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1034-9. PubMed PMID: 16105403.
14. Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, et al. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1447-55. Epub 2009 Aug 5. Review. PubMed PMID: 19655209.
15. Biron S, Hould FS, Lebel S, et al. Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? Obes Surg. 2004;14(2):160-4. PubMed PMID: 15018742.
16. 2) compared to severely obese. Obes Surg. 2011;21(4):421-5.
17. FDA NEWS RELEASE, Feb 16 2011.
18. Valera-Mora ME, Simeoni B, Gagliardi L, et al. Predictors of weight loss and reversal of comorbidities in malabsorbitive bariatric surgery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(6):1292-7. PubMed PMID: 15941878.
19. Cunneen SA. Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(3 Suppl):S47-55. Review. PubMed PMID:18501315.
20. Singhal R, Bryant C, Kitchen M, et al. Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2980-6. Epub 2010 Jul 31. PubMed PMID: 20680349.
21. Stroh C, Hohmann U, Schramm H, et al. Fourteen-year long-term results after gastric banding. J Obes. 2011;2011:128451. Epub 2010 Dec 22. PubMed PMID: 21234392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3017910.
22. Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, et al. Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1078-85. PubMed PMID: 20496124.