Copy-move forgery detection using multiresolution local binary patterns

Forensic Science International

Volumn 231, Issue 1-3, 2013, Pages 61-72

  Davarzani, Reza ^a   Yaghmaie, Khashayar ^a   Mozaffari, Saeed ^a   Tapak, Meysam ^a  

^a SEMNAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Copy move forgery; Digital image forensics; Duplicated region detection.; Local binary patterns

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIGITAL IMAGING; FORGERY; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MULTIRESOLUTION LOCAL BINARY PATTERN; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84878859465     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: 18726283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. C. Amsberry, Alterations of photos raise host of legal, ethical issues, The Wall Street Journal, Jan 1989.
2. Cox I.J., Miller M.L., Bloom J.A. Digital Watermarking 2001, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, San Francisco.
3. Cox I.J., Miller M.L., Linnartz J.M.G., Kalker T. A review of watermarking principles and practices, In: digital signal processing for multimedia systems 1999, 461-485. Marcell Dekker Inc, New York, USA.
4. Blythe P., Fridrich J. Secure digital camera. Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS) 2004.
5. Rocha A., Scheirer W.J., Boult T.E., Goldenstein S. Vision of the unseen: Current trends and challenges in digital image and video forensics. ACM Comput. Surv (CSUR) 2011, 43(4). 26:1-26:42.
6. Farid H. A survey of image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2009, 26(2):16-25.
7. Fridrich J., Soukal D., Lukas J. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. in: Proceedings of the digital forensic research workshop 2003.
8. Huang Y., et al. Improved DCT-based detection of copy-move forgery in images. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 206(1-3):178-184.
9. Cao Y., Gao T., Fan L., Yang Q. A robust detection algorithm for copy-move forgery in digital images. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012, 214:33-43.
10. Popescu A.C., Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions, Technical Report TR2004-515 2004, Dartmouth College.
11. Bayram S., Taha Sencar H., Memon N. An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery. in: IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2009, 1053-1056.
12. Li G., Wu Q., Tu D., Sun S. A sorted neighborhood approach for detecting duplicated regions in image forgeries based on DWT and SVD. in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Beijing 2007, 1750-1753.
13. Mahdian B., Saic S. Detection of copy-move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 171:180-189.
14. Bravo-Solorio S., Nandi A.K. Automated detection and localisation of duplicated regions affected by reflection, rotation and scaling in image forensics. Signal Process 2011, 91:1759-1770. (Elsevier).
15. Ryu S.J., Lee M.J., Lee H.K. Detection of copy-rotate-move forgery using zernike moments. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Information hiding, Calgary 2010, 51-65.
16. Shao H., et al. Image region duplication detection based on circular window expansion and phase correlation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012, 222:71-82.
17. Huang H., Guo W., Zhang Y. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images using SIFT algorithm. in IEEE Pacific-Asia Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application 2008, 272-276.
18. Pan X., Lyu S. Region duplication detection using image feature matching. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensics Secur. 2010, 5(4):857-867.
19. Amerini I., Ballan L., Caldelli R., Del Bimbo A., Serra G. A SIFT-based forensic method for copy-move attack detection and transformation recovery. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forensics Secur. 2011, 6(3):1099-1110.
20. Ojala T., Pietikinen M., Harwood D. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distribution. Pattern Recog. 1996, 29(1):51-59.
21. Ojala T., Pietikinen M., Menp T. Multiresolution grayscale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal.Mach. Intell. 2002, 24(7):971-987.
22. Ahonen T., Hadid A., Pietikinen M. Face description with local binary patterns: Application to face recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28(12):2037-2041.
23. Hadid A., Pietikinen M., Ahonen T. A discriminative feature space for detecting and recognizing faces,. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2 2004, 797-804.
24. Feng X., Pietikinen M., Hadid A. Facial expression recognition with local binary patterns and linear programming. Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 2005, 15:550-552.
25. Heikkila M., Pietikinen M. A texture-based method for modeling the background and detecting moving objects. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28(4):657-662.
26. Takala V., Ahonen T., Pietikinen M. Block-based methods for image retrieval using local binary patterns. Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis (SCIA) 2005, 882-891.
27. Li Z., Liu G., Yang Y., You J. Scale- and rotation-invariant local binary pattern using scale-adaptive texton and subuniform-based circular shift. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2012, 21(4):2130-2140.
28. Bentley J.L. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM 1975, 18:509-526.
29. Lee D.T., Wong C.K. Worst-case analysis for region and partial region searches in multidimensional binary search trees and balanced quad trees. Acta Informatica 1977, 9(1):23-29.
30. Fischler M.A., Bolles R.C. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 1981, 24(6):381-395.
31. T.-T. Ng, S.-F. Chang, J. Hsu, M. Pepeljugoski, Columbia photographic images and photorealistic computer graphics dataset, ADVENT, Columbia University, Tech. Rep., 2004.