Infra-red Thermography for High Throughput Field Phenotyping in Solanum tuberosum

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Prashar, Ankush ^a   Yildiz, Jane ^a   McNicol, James W ^a   Bryan, Glenn J ^a   Jones, Hamlyn G ^a,b  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT FIELD PHENOTYPING; INFRARED PHOTOGRAPHY; MATURITY; MOISTURE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT TUBER; POTATO; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

AGRICULTURE; GENOTYPE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFRARED RAYS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TEMPERATURE; THERMOGRAPHY;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84878805603     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065816     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Sinclair TR, Purcell LC, (2005) Is a physiological perspective relevant in a 'genocentric' age? Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 2777-2782.
2. Montes JM, Melchinger AE, Reif JC, (2007) Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends in Plant Science 12: 433-436.
3. Tuberosa R, (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Frontiers in physiology 3: 347-347.
4. Mir RR, Zaman-Allah M, Sreenivasulu N, Trethowan R, Varshney RK, (2012) Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125: 625-645.
5. Furbank RT, Tester M, (2011) Phenomics- technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 16: 635-644.
6. Jalink H, Van der Schoor R (2009) Method and device for determining plant material quality using images containing information about the quantum efficiency and time response of the photosynthetic system. In: NLP184672: Dpan, editor. http://patentscopewipoint/search/en/detailjsf?docId=WO2010101460&recNum=292&docAn=NL2010050105&queryString=(FP/quantum)%2520&maxRec=2955.
7. Witt S, Galicia L, Lisec J, Cairns J, Tiessen A, et al. (2012) Metabolic and Phenotypic Responses of Greenhouse-Grown Maize Hybrids to Experimentally Controlled Drought Stress. Molecular Plant 5: 401-417.
8. Birch ANE, Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J, Heckmann LH, et al. (2007) The role of laboratory, glasshouse and field scale experiments in understanding the interactions between genetically modified crops and soil ecosystems: A review of the ECOGEN project. Pedobiologia 51: 251-260.
9. Limpens J, Granath G, Aerts R, Heijmans MMPD, Sheppard LJ, et al. (2012) Glasshouse vs field experiments: do they yield ecologically similar results for assessing N impacts on peat mosses? New Phytologist 195: 408-418.
10. Graham J, Hackett CA, Smith K, Woodhead M, MacKenzie K, et al. (2011) Towards an understanding of the nature of resistance to Phytophthora root rot in red raspberry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123: 585-601.
11. Poorter H, Buhler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA, (2012) Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology 39: 839-850.
12. Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 428 pp.-428 pp. p.
13. Jones HG (1987) Breeding for stomatal characters. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G D, Cowan I R, editor. Stomatal function. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 431-443.
14. Jones HG (2004) What is water use efficiency. In: Bacon MA, editor. Water use efficiency in plant biology. Sheffield: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 27-41.
15. Jones HG (1981) The use of stochastic modelling to study the influence of stomatal behaviour on yield-climate relationships. In: Charles-Edward D A, Rose D A, editor. Mathematics and plant physiology. London: Academic press. pp. 231-244.
16. Cowan I (1986) Economics of carbon fixation in higher plants. In: Givnish TJ, editor. On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 133-170.
17. Jones HG, (2004) Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2427-2436.
18. Merlot S, Mustilli AC, Genty B, North H, Lefebvre V, et al. (2002) Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. Plant Journal 30: 601-609.
19. Price AH, Cairns JE, Horton P, Jones HG, Griffiths H, (2002) Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 989-1004.
20. Jones HG, Serraj R, Loveys BR, Xiong LZ, Wheaton A, et al. (2009) Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Functional Plant Biology 36: 978-989.
21. Takai T, Matsuura S, Nishio T, Ohsumi A, Shiraiwa T, et al. (2006) Rice yield potential is closely related to crop growth rate during late reproductive period. Field Crops Research 96: 328-335.
22. Horie T, Matsuura S, Takai T, Kuwasaki K, Ohsumi A, et al. (2006) Genotypic difference in canopy diffusive conductance measured by a new remote-sensing method and its association with the difference in rice yield potential. Plant Cell and Environment 29: 653-660.
23. Horie T LI, Takai T., Ohsumi A., Kuwasaki K., Katsura K. & Nii A. (2003) Physiological traits associated with high yield potential in rice. In: T.WMew, D. SBrar, SPeng, DDawe & BHardy, editors. Rice Science: Innovations and Impact for Livelihood. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines. pp. 117-145.
24. Amani I, Fischer RA, Reynolds MP, (1996) Canopy temperature depression association with yield of irrigated spring wheat cultivars in a hot climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift Fur Acker Und Pflanzenbau 176: 119-129.
25. Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu ZM, Condon AG, et al. (1998) Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Science 38: 1467-1475.
26. Zheng TC, Zhang XK, Yin GH, Wang LN, Han YL, et al. (2011) Genetic gains in grain yield, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance achieved in Henan Province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Research 122: 225-233.
27. Aminian R, Mohammadi S, Hoshmand SA, Khodambashi M, (2010) The genetic analysis of stomatal frequency and size, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using substitution lines series. Wheat Information Service pp. 25-34.
28. Lu ZM, Radin JW, Turcotte EL, Percy R, Zeiger E, (1994) High Yields in Advanced Lines of Pima Cotton are associated with higher stomatal conductance, reduced leaf-area and lower leaf temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 92: 266-272.
29. Lu ZM, Chen JW, Percy RG, Sharifi MR, Rundel PW, et al. (1996) Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination and its relation to stomatal conductance in pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 127-132.
30. Patterson HD, Williams ER, (1976) New Class Of Resolvable Incomplete Block Designs. Biometrika 63: 83-92.
31. Jones HG, Stoll M, Santos T, de Sousa C, Chaves MM, et al. (2002) Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2249-2260.
32. Knapp SJ, Bridges WC, (1990) Using Molecular Markers to estimate Quantitative Trait Locus parameters- Power and Genetic Variances for Unreplicated and Replicated progeny. Genetics 126: 769-777.
33. Rebetzke GJ, Rattey AR, Farquhar GD, Richards RA, Condon AG, (2012) Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. Functional Plant Biology pp
34. Maes WH, Steppe K, (2012) Estimating evapotranspiration and drought stress with ground-based thermal remote sensing in agriculture: a review. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 4671-4712.
35. Rebetzke GJ, Rattey AR, Farquhar GD, Richards RA, Condon AG, (2012) Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. Functional Plant Biology (in press).
36. Stoll M, Jones HG (2005) Infrared thermography as a viable tool for monitoring plant stress. XIV International GESCO Viticulture Congress, Geisenheim, Germany, 23-27 August, 2005. pp. 211-218.
37. Lopes MS, Reynolds MP, Jalal-Kamali MR, Moussa M, Feltaous Y, et al. (2012) The yield correlations of selectable physiological traits in a population of advanced spring wheat lines grown in warm and drought environments. Field Crops Research 128: 129-136.
38. Rattey AR, Shorter R, Chapman SC, (2011) Evaluation of CIMMYT conventional and synthetic spring wheat germplasm in rainfed sub-tropical environments. II. Grain yield components and physiological traits. Field Crops Research 124: 195-204.