Pattern of follow-up care and early relapse detection in breast cancer patients

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 859-868

  Geurts, Sandra M E ^a   De Vegt, Femmie ^a   Siesling, Sabine ^b,c   Flobbe, Karin ^b   Aben, Katja K H ^a,b   Van Der Heiden Van Der Loo, Margriet ^b   Verbeek, André L M ^a   Van Dijck, Jos A A M ^a   Tjan Heijnen, Vivianne C G ^d  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Cancer Registry and Research   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Physical examination; Relapse; Routine follow up

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECOND CANCER; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE; BREAST TUMOR; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; TUMOR RECURRENCE; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;

EID: 84878756127     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2297-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg NABON (2002) Richtlijn behandeling mammacarcinoom
2. Lu WL, Jansen L, Post WJ, Bonnema J, van de Velde CJ, de Bock GH (2009) Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:403-412
3. Houssami N, Ciatto S (2010) Mammographic surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer: how accurate? How effective? Breast 19:439-445
4. Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Distante V, Pacini P (1999) Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up. JAMA 281:1586
5. Lu W, Jansen L, Schaapveld M, Baas PC, Wiggers T, de Bock GH (2011) Underuse of long-term routine hospital follow-up care in patients with a history of breast cancer? BMC Cancer 11:279
6. Grandjean I, Kwast AB, de Vries H, Klaase J, Schoevers WJ, Siesling S (2011) Evaluation of the adherence to follow-up care guidelines for women with breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16(3):281-285
7. Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, Moineddin R (2010) Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract 6:174-181
8. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Martinelli F, Bonardi R, Duffy SW (2009) Early detection of second breast cancers improves prognosis in breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 20:1505-1510
9. De Bock GH, Bonnema J, van der Hage J, Kievit J, van de Velde CJ (2004) Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol 22:4010-4018
10. Lu W, de Bock GH, Schaapveld M, Baas PC, Wiggers T, Jansen L (2011) The value of routine physical examination in the follow up of women with a history of early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 47:676-682
11. Blamey RW (2002) Estimation of prognosis of the individual with primary breast cancer and its applications. Scand J Surg 91:273-278
12. Hayes DF (2011) An overview of breast cancer. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed 9 Nov 2011
13. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg NABON (2008) Mammacarcinoma
14. Cooper GS, Johnson CC, Lamerato L, Poisson LM, Schultz L, Simpkins J, Wells K, Yood MU, Chase G, Nathanson SD, Lafata JE (2006) Use of guideline recommended follow-up care in cancer survivors: routine or diagnostic indications? Med Care 44:590-594
15. Ciatto S, Miccinesi G, Zappa M (2004) Prognostic impact of the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:1496-1501
16. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Jack WJ, Kerr GR, Kunkler IH, Thomas J, Dixon JM (2007) Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience. Br J Cancer 96:1802-1807
17. De Koning HJ, van Dongen JA, van der Maas PJ (1994) Changes in use of breast-conserving therapy in years 1978-2000. Br J Cancer 70:1165-1170
18. Voogd AC, van Beek MW, Crommelin MA, Kluck HM, Repelaer van Driel OJ, Coebergh JW (1994) Management of early breast cancer in southeast Netherlands since 1984. A population-based study. Regional Breast Cancer Study Group. Acta Oncol 33:753-757
19. Ernst MF, Voogd AC, Coebergh J-WW, Poortmans PM, Roukema JA (2004) Using loco-regional recurrence as an indicator of the quality of breast cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 40:487-493
20. Van der Heiden-van-der Loo M, Ho VK, Damhuis RA, Siesling S, Menke MB, Peeters PH, Rutgers EJ (2010) Percentage of local recurrence following treatment for breast cancer is not a suitable performance indicator. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:A1984
21. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Cooke TG (2007) Follow-up in breast cancer: does routine clinical examination improve outcome? A systematic review of the literature. Br J Cancer 97:1632-1641
22. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg NABON (2012) Mammacarcinoom
23. Van Hezewijk M, Ranke GMC, van Nes JGH, Stiggelbout AM, de Bock GH, van de Velde CJ (2011) Patients' needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:765-773
24. Armes J, Crowe M, Colbourne L, Morgan H, Murrells T, Oakley C, Palmer N, Ream E, Young A, Richardson A (2009) Patients' supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol 27:6172-6179
25. Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Voogd AC, Falger P, Gijsen BC, Thuring M, Lenssen A, van der Ent F, Verkeyn J, Haekens C, Hupperets P, Nuytinck JK, van Riet Y, Brenninkmeijer SJ, Scheijmans LJ, Kessels A, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2011) Nurse-led telephone follow-up and an educational group programme after breast cancer treatment: results of a 2 × 2 randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:1027-1036
26. Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Stewart J, Cole D, Vessey M (1999) Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 49:705-710
27. Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S (2009) Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 13:2-8
28. Brodersen J, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC (2010) The benefits and harms of screening for cancer with a focus on breast screening. Pol Arch Med Wewn 120:89-94
29. Health Council of the Netherlands (2007) Follow-up in oncology: identify objectives, substantiate actions. Report No. 2007/10. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands