Simulation of land use change and temporal-spatial heterogeneity of eco-risk in urban fringe

Research of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 540-548

  Tian, Yi Chao ^a   Liang, Ming Zhong ^a   Ren, Zhi Yuan ^b  

^a QINZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHAANXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Binary Logistic; CA Markov; Heterogeneity; Land use; Spatial simulation

Indexed keywords

MARKOV PROCESSES; RISKS; SPACE APPLICATIONS;

CA-MARKOV; CONSTRUCTION LAND; HETEROGENEITY; LAND-USE STRUCTURES; SIMULATED RESULTS; SPATIAL SIMULATION; SPATIAL STRUCTURE; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL;

LAND USE;

EID: 84878754215     PISSN: 10016929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. TURNER H B L, SKOLE D, SANDERSON S, et al. Land use and land cover change [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1997, 4(1): 26-33.
2. BORMANN H, BREUER L, GRAFF T, et al. Analysing the effects of soil properties changes associated with land use changes on the simulated water balance: a comparison of three hydrological catchment models for scenario analysis [J]. Ecol Model, 2007, 209(1): 29-40.
3. BRATH A, MONTANARI A, MORETTI G. Assessing the effect on flood frequency of land use change via hydrological simulation (with uncertainty) [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 324(1/2/3/4): 141-153.
4. LI Zhi, LIU Wenzhao, ZHANG Xunchang, et al. Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 377(1/2): 35-42.
5. 1993, 48(4): 317-328.
6. CLARKE K C, GAYDOS L J, HOPPEN S. A self modified cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area [J]. Environment and Planning B, 1997, 24: 247-261.
7. WEI Wei, CHEN Liding, FU Bojie, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 335(3/4): 247-258.
8. MARTINEZ M L, PEREZ MAQUEO O, VAZQUEZ G, et al. Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 1856-1863.
9. DEFRIE S R, ESHLEMAN K N. Land use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2004, 18(11): 2183-2186.
10. 2011, 23(1): 29-34.
11. 2008, 28(11): 5454-5460.
12. 2011, 24(11): 1318-1324.
13. RAPPORT D J. Evaluating landscape health: integrating social goals and biophysical process [J]. J Environ Manage, 1998, 53: 1-15.
14. 2008, 21(3): 104-109.
15. 2010, 30(2): 161-167.
16. VELDKAMP A, FRESCO L O. CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects [J]. Ecological Model, 1996, 85: 253-270
17. VERBURG P H, VELDKAMP W, ESPALDON R, et al. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model [J]. Environ Manage, 2002, 30(3): 391-405.
18. DARREL G J, WU Jianguo. Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central arizona-phoenix region, USA [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2001, 16(7): 611-626.
19. GOBIM A, CAMPLING P, FEYEN J. Logistic modeling to derive agricultural land determinants: a case study from southeastern Nigeria [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 2002, 89: 213-228.
20. LIU Xiaohang, ANDERSSON C. Assessing the impact of temporal dynamics on land-use change modeling [J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28(1/2): 107-124.
21. MANSON S. Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatan peninsular region of Mexico [J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2005, 111(1/2/3/4): 47-62.
22. HULST R. On the dynamics of vegetation: Markov chains as models of succession [J]. Vegetation, 1997, 40(1): 3-14.
23. CLARKE K C, GAYDOS L J, HOPPENS. A self modified cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco bay area [J]. Environment and Planning B, 1997, 24: 247-261.
24. TEERASIT K, MANO J K A, PRAMOD K, et al. Super resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005, 96(3/4): 302-314.
25. 2007, 32(5): 414-418.
26. 2005, 24(2): 206-213.
27. 2002, 39(6): 405-411.
28. 1998, 9(6): 651-657.
29. 2010, 2(1): 102-106.
30. 2008, 25(6): 899-902.
31. 2008, 27(2): 229-234.
32. 2010, 26(12): 324-329.
33. 2007, 62(6): 589-598.
34. 2007, 23(10): 93-97.
35. 2009, 64(4): 456-468.
36. 2011, 31(8): 903-910.
37. 2012, 31(7): 1823-1831.
38. 2011, 30(1): 130-134.
39. 2007, 16(5): 5-13.
40. 2011, 31(4): 688-695.
41. 2003, 22(4): 116-120.
42. 2012, 31(1): 227-234.
43. 2011, 31(3): 140-145.
44. 2010, 30(1): 232-235.