Mapping Green Product Spaces of Nations

Journal of Environment and Development

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 155-168

  Hamwey, Robert ^a   Pacini, Henrique ^b   Assunção, Lucas ^a  

^a United Nations Conference on Trade and Development   (Switzerland)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

development; exports; green products; product space; trade

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EXPORT; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRADE PERFORMANCE;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84878750161     PISSN: 10704965     EISSN: 15525465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1070496513482837     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ackbarally N.Mauritius: A cyber-island in the making. London, UK: Panos Features; 2002:.
2. Balassa B.Comparative advantage in manufactured goods: A reappraisal.The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1986;68:315-319.
3. Businessweek. (2011, November22). Brazil to become net importer of U.S. ethanol. [Online edition]. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-22/brazil-to-become-net-importer-of-u-s-ethanol-czarnikow-says.html.
4. Dierickx I.,Matutes C.,Neven D.Cost differences and survival in declining industries: A case for "Picking winners?".European Economic Review. 1991;35:1507-1528.
5. Eickelpasch A.,Fritsch M.Contests for cooperation: A new approach in German innovation policy.Research Policy. 2005;34:1269-1282.
6. Hausmann R.,Klinger B.Structural transformation and patterns of comparative advantage in the product space. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development; 2006:.
7. Hidalgo C.,Hausmann R.The building blocks of economic complexity.Proceeding of the National Academy of Science. 2009;106:10570-10575.
8. HidalgoC. (2011). Discovering Southern and East Africa's industrial opportunities (Economic Policy Paper Series, The German Marshall Fund of the United States). Retrieved from http://www.chidalgo.com/Papers/HidalgoCA_GMF_2011.pdf.
9. Hidalgo C.,Klinger B.,Barabasi A. L.,Hausmann R.The product space conditions the development of nations.Science. 2007;317 (5837): 482-487.
10. Huberty M.,Zachmann G.Green exports and the global product space: Prospects for EU industrial policy. Brussels, Belgium: Bruegel; 2011:.
11. Hughes A.Retailers, knowledges and changing commodity networks: The case of the cut flower trade.Geoforum. 2000;31:175-190.
12. Jovanovic B.,Nyarko Y.Learning by doing and the choice of technology.Econometrica. 1996;64:1299-1310.
13. Kao P. K.Environmental goods and services negotiations. Geneva, Switzerland: WTO. In International Trade Policies and Climate Change Governance. SpringerBriefs in Economics; 2012:.
14. Niman N. B.Picking winners and losers in the global technology race.Contemporary Economic Policy. 1995;13:77-87.
15. Pacini H.,Silveira S.Consumer choice between ethanol and gasoline. Lessons from Brazil and Sweden.Energy Policy. 2011;39:6936-6942.
16. Pack H.,Saggi K.The case for industrial policy: A critical survey. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006:.
17. Perez-Aleman P.Cluster formation, institutions and learning: The emergence of clusters and development in Chile.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14:651-677.
18. Roberts J. T.,Parks B. C.A climate of injustice. global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 2007:.
19. Rodriguez-Clare A.Clusters and comparative advantage: Implications for industrial policy.Journal of Development Economics. 2007;82:43-57.
20. Stein J.The legal status of eco-labels and product and process methods in the World Trade Organization.American Journal of Economics and Business Administration. 2009;1:285-295.
21. Vikhlyaev A.Environmental goods and services: Defining negotiations or negotiating definitions. New York, NY: UNCTAD; 2004:.
22. Committee on Trade and Environment in Special Session. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2011:.