Decomposition analysis on China's industrial wastewater discharges in 1992-2008

Research of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 569-575

  Li, Chang Jia ^a   Pan, Cheng Zhong ^a   Lei, Hong Jun ^b   Tian, Pei ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power   (China)

Author keywords

Decomposition analysis; Industrial wastewater; Logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI); Sub sectors

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER; DIVISIA INDEX; INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES; INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGES; INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATERS; SUB-SECTORS; TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS;

MANUFACTURE;

EID: 84878746788     PISSN: 10016929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 2001-2010.
2. 2010(14): 4-7.
3. 2012, 27(8): 56-62.
4. 2005, 15(5): 7-14.
5. 2008, 18(5): 123-127.
6. 2012, 33(3): 135-138.
7. LEI H J, XIA X F, LI C J, et al. Decomposition analysis of wastewater pollutant discharges in industrial sectors of China (2001-2009) using the LMDI method [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012, 9: 2226-2240.
8. 2009, 30(3): 707-712.
9. SUN J W. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model [J]. Energy Economics, 1998, 20: 85-100.
10. ANG B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(9): 1131-1139.
11. 2009, 28(2): 285-292.
12. WANG W C, MU H L, KANG X D, et al. Changes in industrial electricity consumption in china from 1998 to 2007 [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3684-3690.
13. MA C B, STERN D I. China's changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30: 1037-1053.
14. STERN D I. Explaining changes in global sulfur emissions: an econometric decomposition approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 42: 201-220.
15. STERN D I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve [J]. World Development, 2004, 32: 1419-1439.
16. 2008, 18(3): 38-42.
17. HAMMOND G P, NORMAN J B. Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing [J]. Energy, 2012, 41: 220-227.
18. 2 emissions from passenger cars: the cases of Greece and Denmark [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37: 3259-3267.
19. 2004, 40(4): 561-568.
20. 2007, 26(5): 931-939.
21. 2011, 24(1): 20-26.
22. 2012, 25(2): 232-239.
23. DE BRUYN S M. Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions [J]. Environment and Development Economics, 1997, 2: 485-503.
24. 2 emissions from energy use: Turkish case [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(11): 4689-4699.
25. ANG B W, ZHANG E Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies [J]. Energy, 2000, 25: 1149-1176.
26. ANG B W, LIU F L. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent aggregation [J]. Energy, 2001, 26: 537-548.
27. ANG B W, ZHANG F Q, CHOI K H. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J]. Energy, 1998, 23: 489-495.
28. 1992-2009.
29. 1992-2009.
30. 2 emission? a structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 868-886.
31. TAO Z N, HEWINGS G, DONAGHY K. An economic analysis of Midwestern US criteria pollutant emissions trends from 1970 to 2000 [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1666-1674.
32. 2007, 30(5): 43-47.
33. 2003(10): 38-43.