Ethics of expert opinion and the observations of the department-related parliamentary standing committee on the CDSCO

Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 297-299

  Jesani, Amar ^a  

^a Anusandhan Trust   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG MANUFACTURE; DRUG RESEARCH; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW;

EID: 84878699535     PISSN: 0976500X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0976-500X.103684     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Department related parliamentary standing committee on health and family welfare, 59th Report on The Functioning of Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), Government of India. Available from:http://164.100.47.5/ newcommittee/reports/englishcommittees/committee%20 on %20 health %20 and %20 family %20 welfare/59. pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 May 8].
2. Srinivasan S, Jesani A.Standing committee report on CDSCO: Hard facts confirm an open secret. Indian J Med Ethics2012;9:148-50.
3. Pandey V. "The shocking Medical Scam" DNA 2012. Downloaded from http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-dna-special-the-shocking-medicalscam- 1688378 accessed on 2012 Sep 20.
4. Friston M.Roles and responsibilities of medical expert witnesses. BMJ 2005;331:305-6.
5. Resnik D. "Punishing medical experts for unethical testimony: A step in the right direction or a step too far?"JPhilosSciLaw 2004;4:2004.
6. Butler D. "France tightens conflict rules".Nature 2011;478:169.