Évaluer une intervention complexe: enjeux conceptuels, méthodologiques, et opérationnels

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1-16

  Contandriopoulos, André Pierre ^a   Rey, Lynda ^a   Brousselle, Astrid ^b   Champagne, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878661399     PISSN: 08341516     EISSN: 00077720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alkin, M. C. (1985). A guide for evaluation decision makers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Alkin, M. C. (1991). Evaluation theory development, II . Dans M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Éds.). Evaluation and education at quarter century (pp. 91-112). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3. Arendt, H. (1972). Vérité et politique. La crise de la culture: huit exercices de pensée politique. Paris, France: Gallimard.
4. Atlan, H. (2002). La cellule vivante: un paradigme des systèmes naturels complexes (Vol. 18). Sèvres, France: EDK.
5. Bourricaud, F. (1981). The sociology of Talcott Parsons. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Brousselle, A., Champagne, F., Contandriopoulos, A.-P., & Hartz, Z. (2009). L'évaluation: concepts et méthodes. Montréal, QC: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
7. Butcher, R. B. (1998). Foundations for evidence-based decision making. Dans Canadian health action: Building on the legacy (Vol. 5, pp. 259-290). National Forum on Health. Québec, QC: MultiMondes.
8. Contandriopoulos, D., Brousselle, A., & Kedoté, N. M. (2008). Evaluating interventions aimed at promoting information utilization in organizations and systems. Healthcare Policy /Politiques de Santé, 4(1), 89-107.
9. Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4). 397-418.
10. Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. 10.1007/0- 306-47559-6-14. Teachers College Record, 64, 672-683.
11. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., et al. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Johnson, R. B. (1998). Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21(1), 93-110.
13. Lavis, J. N. (2006). Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 37-45.
14. Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B., & Abelson, J. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221-248.
15. Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.
16. Morin, E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris, France: ESF.
17. Morin, E., & Le Moigne, J. (1999). L'intelligence de la complexité. Paris, France: L'Harmattan.
18. Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
19. Parsons, T. (1977). Social systems and the evolution of action theory. New York, NY: Free Press.
20. Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1959). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Pawson, R. (2002a). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8(2), 157-181.
23. Pawson, R. (2002b). Evidence-based policy: The promise of "realist synthesis." Evaluation, 8(3), 340-358.
24. Provus, M. M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation for educational program improvement and assessment. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
25. Rocher, G. (1972). Talcott Parsons et la sociologie américaine (1ière éd.). Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
26. Scriven, M. (1972). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Comments, 3(4), 1-4.
27. Sen, A. (1994). Objectivity and position: assessment of health and wellbeing.
28. Dans L. C. Chen & A. Kleinman (Éds.), WarwNC Health and Social Change in International Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Shiell, A., Hawe, P., & Gold, L. (2008). Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ, 336(7656), 1281-1283.
30. Sicotte, C., Champagne, F., & Contandriopoulos, A.-P. (1998). La performance organisationnelle des systèmes publics de santé. Ruptures, 6(1), 34-46.
31. Slaate, H. (1968). The pertinence of the paradox: The dialectics of reasonin- existence. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
32. Stake, R. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523-540.
33. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Kappa, P. (1972a). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
34. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Kappa, P. (1972b). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making (Vol. lIl). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
35. Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426-431.
36. Weiss, C. H. (1982). Policy research in the context of diffuse decision making. Journal of Higher Education, 53(6), 619-639.
37. Weiss, C. H. (1988). Reports on topic areas. Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? American Journal of Evaluation, 9(1), 5-19.
38. Weiss, C. H. (1993). Where politics and evaluation research meet. American Journal of Evaluation, 14(1), 93-106.