Effective and ineffective uses of emerging technologies: Towards a transformative pedagogical model

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 652-661

  Ng'Ambi, Dick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANECDOTAL EVIDENCES; CULTURAL-HISTORICAL; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; HIGHER EDUCATION; HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (HEIS); NATIONAL SURVEYS; PEDAGOGICAL MODEL; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

TEACHING;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84878660535     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12053     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anderson, T., (2003). Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction, [online]. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/149/230
2. Anderson, T., (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. In, T. Anderson, &, F. Elloumi, (Eds), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33-60). Athabasca: Athabasca University.
3. Badat, S., (2010). The challenges of transformation in higher education and training institutions in South Africa. Paper commissioned by Development Bank of South Africa [online]. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from http://tinyurl.com/ 2010badat
4. Cole, M., (1999). Cultural psychology: some general principles and a concrete example. In, Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, &, R. L. Punamaki, (Eds), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 87-106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Council on Higher Education (2010). Access and throughput in South African Higher Education-three case studies. Higher Education Monitor No. 9. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.
6. Department of Higher Education and Training (2010). Report on the stakeholder summit on higher education transformation called by the minister of higher education and training, Dr Blade Nzimande: 22-23 April 2010. Cape Town: DHET and Centre for Policy Development (CEPD).
7. Edward, A., (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: a CHAT analysis. [online]. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from http://www.chat.kansai-u.ac.jp/ english/publications/actio/pdf/1-Edwards.pdf
8. Garrison, D. R., &, Anderson, T., (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
9. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., &, Kirsch, D., (2001). Distributed cognition: towards a new foundation for human-computer interaction reasearch. In, J. M. Carroll, (Ed.), Human-computer interaction in the new millenium (pp. 75-94). New York: ACM Press.
10. Johnson, L., &, Adams, S., (2011). Technology outlook for UK tertiary education 2011-2016: an NMC horizon report regional analysis. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
11. Jonassen, D., &, Rohrer-Murphy, L., (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47, 1, 61-79.
12. Koszalka, T., (2004). A cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of technology Integration: case study of two teachers. [online]. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from: http://www.tlu.ee/~kpata/haridustehnoloogiaTLU/ technologyintegration.pdf
13. Lim, C. P., (2002). A theoretical framework for the study of ICT in schools: a proposal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 4, 411-421.
14. Salomon, G., (1993). Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Veletsianos, G., (2010). A definition of emerging technologies for education. In, G. Velestianos, (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 1-22). Edmonton: AU Press.
16. Williams, R., Karousou, R., &, Mackness, J., (2011). Emergent learning ecologies in web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 3, 39-59.