Frames and Ambivalence in Context: An Analysis of Hands-On Experts' Perception of the Welfare of Animals in Traveling Circuses in The Netherlands

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 523-535

  Nijland, Hanneke J ^a   Aarts, Noelle M C ^a,b   Renes, Reint Jan ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Animal welfare; Circus; Coping strategies; Frame of reference; Perceptions; Symbolic convergence

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; COPING STRATEGY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84878655424     PISSN: 11877863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9252-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1984). Dictionary of sociology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
2. Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: Rowman Altamira Press.
3. Bock, B. B., & van Huik, M. M. (2007). Animal welfare: The attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers. British Food Journal, 109(11), 931-944.
4. Bormann, E. G. (1985). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. The Journal of Communication, 35(4), 128-138.
5. de Spinoza, B. (1677). The ethics. Part III, scholium to Proposition 9.
6. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
10. Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-246.
11. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating. Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
12. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations; the social identity approach. London: Sage.
13. Hopster, H., Dierendonck, M. V., Brandt, H. V. D., & Reenen, K. V. (2009). Welfare of animals in travelling circuses in the Netherlands; Circus practice in 2008 Report. Lelystad: Animal Sciences Group of Wageningen UR.
14. Kesnig, H. (unknown, but before 1920). Levende requisieten. In T. v. d. Blink and J. Eigenhuis (eds.), Op zonnige wegen, Groningen/Den Haag: J. B. Wolters, 85-90.
15. Kickert, W. J. M., & Klijn, E. H. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.
16. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, L. W. (1997). Moral conflict. When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Pepper, G. L. (1995). Communicating in organizations: A cultural approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
19. Rein, M., & Schön, D. A. (1986). Frame-reflective policy discourse. Beleidsanalyse, 15(4), 4-18.
20. Reynolds, T. J., Dethloff, C., & Westberg, S. J. (2001). Advancements in laddering. In T. J. Reynolds & J. C. Olson (Eds.), Understanding consumer decision making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229-240.
22. Schicktanz, S. (2006). Ethical considerations of the human-animal-relationship under conditions of asymmetry and ambivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1), 7-16.
23. Serpell, J. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan-The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
25. Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., & van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers' and consumers' perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15(2), 203-219.
26. Zanola, R. (2008). Who likes circus animals? POLIS Working Papers, 127.